top of page

Volume 2: Issue 4 | July 2019

Explanation of the Tenth Commandment

 

"You shall not covet your neighbor's house; 

you shall not covet your neighbor's wife,

or his male servant, or his ox, or his donkey,

or anything that is your neighbor's."

-- Exodus 20:17 

          "You shall not covet your neighbor's house." (Exodus 20:17, quoted in Romans 7:7 and Romans 13:9)

"You shall not covet your neighbor's wife." (Deuteronomy 5:21)

"You shall not covet the silver or the gold." (Deuteronomy 7:25)

"Put to death therefore what is earthly in you, sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry." (Colossians 3:5)

 

How is covetousness idolatry? Why equate them, when God gave one commandment against idolatry, and a different commandment against covetousness?

 

In Colossians 3, Paul explains how covetousness is idolatry. We are to seek the things that are above, where Christ is. We are not to set our minds on earthly things because we have died, and our life is hidden with Christ in heaven. When Christ appears, we will appear with him in glory. Our focus is to be heavenly, and our hope in the future revelation of God. Health and wealth then, not now, is Paul’s message.

 

But when we covet something, we seek the thing below. In coveting it, we set our mind on it. We do not care that God calls us upward, because we want what is beneath. We prefer the object to the Lord, because we think we will find a better life in it than in its Creator, our present union with Christ, and the glory that he has in store for us. In short, when we covet, we substitute the Item we covet for Christ. We have a substitute hope, a substitute focus, and anything that substitutes for God is an idol. The Christian life looks upward and forward to Jesus. The coveting life looks downward, stuck in the present.

 

Perhaps the Item has an advantage? It is right there! So we might be able to get it, very soon. It is as good as ours. Isn't a bird in the hand worth two in the bush?

 

Not where coveting is concerned. The bird in the hand is worth more than two in the bush because the two in the bush are uncertain. You probably won't catch them, and may lose the one you have by trying to catch the two. But with coveting, the object you see and hope to hold in your hand is transient, while the Lord you ignore is eternal. (see 2 Corinthians 4:18) The object you so covet is passing away. Like an idol, it is a vain thing. To let it capture your heart in covetousness is idolatry!

 

Jim Elliott, a missionary of the Gospel to Auca Indians in Ecuador, was speared to death at age 39 while trying to announce the Gospel of Christ to them. He is famous for saying, “He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.” The covetous person turns Elliot's words upside-down. He becomes a fool who clutches at what he cannot keep, while ignoring the only things that can be kept forever.

 

So do not covet your neighbor’s house, or his wife, or his silver and gold, or his car, or his fine antiques, or his beautiful artwork, for if you covet them you set your mind on what is earthly. You make the Item your focus, your hope; in short, your god. You are not very good at making god, so all you are able to create is an idol. Nothing provokes God's wrath like idols. “Shall we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than he?” (1 Corinthians 10:22)

 

“Seek the things that are above.” Nothing glorifies God more than being renewed in his image. The life you want is the life to be revealed with Jesus, not the life that is earthly and passing away.

-- John Edgar

10th Commandment

Proverbs Exposition

 

"The blessing of the LORD makes one rich,

and he adds no sorrow with it."

-- Proverbs 10:22 

          This proverb does not teach that the Lord will make you rich. Neither does it teach that hard work is unnecessary. The sluggard, after all, is worse than a fool (Proverbs 10:26). The wise are not always rich, injustice and oppression bring poverty to many, and God’s people often live on little, partly to show the world that we serve God for Himself and not for the blessings that He gives. Satan’s accusation against Job was and is a lie. “Does Job fear God for no reason? Have you not put a hedge around him and his house…? You have blessed the work of his hands…. But stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and he will curse you to your face (Job 1:9-11).”

 

When God does make one rich, however, the riches do not come with sorrow, or regret. The good man whom God makes rich knows that his wealth comes from God (Psalm 127:1). Because he loves God, he has not stolen nor taken advantage of the weak in order to get rich. Neither has he sacrificed all else in life to pursue success, since, “It is in vain that you rise up early and go late to rest, eating the bread of anxious toil; for he gives to his beloved sleep (Psalm 127:2).” Riches given by the Lord do not come with regrets about family neglected, or corners cut, or health ruined, or other people stomped on. The blessing comes without sorrow.

 

Here is how the rich, who know that wealth is God’s blessing, hold their wealth. First, riches do not make them proud people who look down on the average and below average majority, remembering that, “The rich and the poor meet together; the LORD is the maker of them all (Proverbs 22:2).” Godly rich people do not segregate themselves into churches or neighborhoods of all other rich people. Second, they generously share with others in need, heeding Jesus’ words, “But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return, and your reward will be great (Luke 6:35).” Third, they enjoy what they have with an easy conscience, content with house, food, clothes, cars, and vacations they can afford. They are the Lord’s blessings. Fourth, the thought of losing their wealth does not torment them with fear because they know they are in God’s hands. He, not wealth, is their security, so like Paul they know how to be poor as well as how to be rich (Philippians 4:12).

 

Though inconvenient, it is no sin to be poor. Neither is it a sin to be rich, when wealth comes from the Lord’s hand in lawful ways. Wealth that God grants comes unaccompanied by sorrow.

-- Bill Edgar

Proverbs 10:22

Report on the 2019 Synod of the RPCNA

          The 2019 Synod received a great deal of good news. Membership rose 3.4% in the past year, the fastest growth in recent memory. The number of churches, pastors, theological students, and contributions all rose. There is now Chinese-language ministry occurring on the West Coast and in Pittsburgh. The 2020 Vision goal of 100 RPCNA churches and mission churches has been exceeded. Only the number of ruling elders and missionaries fell. We thank God for his blessing on the RPCNA.

 

Despite the fall in formally sent missionaries, mission work generally is doing well. A formerly Roman Catholic congregation in central Pakistan is now a Reformed Presbyterian Church with an ordained Pakistani pastor and elders who preach in two nearby villages. New Christian works are being written in Urdu and translated into Urdu, and the author-translator is flooded with requests to speak. In nearby India a congregation is forming. New missionaries are going to support the self-governing church in South Sudan.

 

Meanwhile, the RPCNA Constitution has been translated into Spanish and will be published soon. Pastors from Chile and Bolivia were present at the Synod. Pray for Bolivia, where a left-wing government is testing its power to regulate and monitor the church, and for the church in various large Asian countries.

 

Missionary Charlie Leach, formerly pastor of Coldenham-Newburgh, gave what amounted to a retirement address. He reported that during his first thirteen years in Japan, during the 1980s, he baptized one man. During his last six, during the 2010s, he baptized six, and one baby. Old people are respected in Japan! Perhaps other ministers near retirement age should minister there as well!

 

Pastor Leach spoke during a debate about the future of the presbytery in Japan. The Global Mission Board, which long had oversight of the mission work in Japan, and has long continued to help fund the presbytery, proposed that the presbytery in Japan become an independent denomination by 2025. The presbytery in Japan believes it is both necessary and desirable that they remain a part of the RPCNA. The Synod sided with the Japan presbytery through the parliamentary method of leaving the GMB's proposals on the table indefinitely.

 

Meanwhile, the pastors and elders in Canada have begun discussions about forming their own Canadian denomination, either alone or with other Canadian churches. As these discussions are embryonic, no word yet on implications for names or endowments.

 

While the Synod heard a great deal of good news, producing good news is more difficult. The Synod does not agree on the meaning of desertion in reference to divorce, though parliamentary considerations may have clouded the vote. Neither does the Synod agree on the implications of Christ's mediatorial kingship for Americans voting in political elections. Committees studying church membership for prisoners and mandatory recusals in judicial cases were not able to complete their work as yet. The Synod was able to agree on dropping the word 'English' from the Bible exam given to theological students, opening the door for some students to be examined in Spanish or other languages. We are glad to face this wonderful complication. The ordination vows taken by elders and deacons will now conclude with the same vow as the covenants of membership and baptism (do you make these promises in the presence of God, in humble reliance upon His grace, as you desire to give your account with joy at the Last Great Day?) Dr. Jeff Stivason was elected professor of New Testament at RPTS, and the boards of the denomination will now enjoy the same oversight as the presbyteries, with the moderator of the Synod appointing elders to review the minutes of each board each year. Other governmental proposals will be worked on further before a final vote. (Two examples: whether and how to disclose the salaries of employees of denominational boards and institutions, as was done formerly, and to demote the status of Synod decisions, currently termed 'law and order of the church' together with the constitutional documents.)

 

Geneva College did a wonderful job hosting the Synod and the Synod of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church. Cheerful drivers in golf carts were ready at all hours to whisk delegates up and down the hilly campus. That being said, the campus lacks an ideal meeting space (size, air conditioning, ability to hear one another) for the Synod, so most future Synods will return to Indiana Wesleyan University.

 

Please pray for a) more ruling elders, all across the denomination, b) men for the ministry (Oct 6 was appointed to be a day of prayer for more pastors), and c) as always, wisdom and Biblical fidelity.

-- John Edgar

2019 Synod Report

Testimony: Honami Hirata

Elkins Park RPC, November 18, 2018

          I was born near Tokyo. I grew up with Christian parents and I received infant baptism in reformed church. I used to go to a Sunday school when I was a child. But when I was 12 years old, my mother said, “If you have something else to do, or if you don't want to go to church, you don't have to go,” so I gradually went away from the church because there was no friend, and I didn't understand why I have to go there every Sunday.

 

I spent my rebellious period from the age 12 to 17. I have 2 sisters, and I was always comparing my mother's love for children between me and my sisters, and I often felt my mother didn't love me. And them my heart became cold to my family, and my attitude was getting colder to them. Along with that, my family almost stopped talking to me.

 

But as a 17 years old, I was aware of my sin. I thought if people knew all of my heart, they would not love me at all. At this moment, I realized that I needed to change myself, and I realized I needed forgiveness from God. Until then, I had believed the presence of God from Sunday school, but I had not realized that I needed Him. Therefore I returned to church.

 

When I was in university, I joined a Bible study at church. In there, I began to understand the Bible and read more by myself. I gradually understood God's love, and also that I could not solve my sin by myself. I needed Jesus's death on the cross to take my sin, and his resurrection to give me a new life. And also church was a good place to rebuild the relationship with my family, because I was living on my own at the time, and I met them just in church on Sunday.

 

I also joined the Christian fellowship during university, and God gave me many good friends. That memory encourages me even now. After graduation, I moved to another area, and I worked in the hospital as a dietitian for 4 years.

 

At that time, I realized I was having trouble finding my future husband. Japanese Christians often marry non-Christians, because the population of faithful Christians is Japan is less than 0.5%. In fact, I could not meet any Christian young man when I was working. But I felt the need of having a “helper” before God. But I decided that if I do not meet Christian man, I should not get married. I thought marrying non-Christian man is unfaithful to God.

 

At such time, I met Yusuke at a Christians' camp. He was working as a staff worker for Inter-Varsity to help college students. We could not talk much in the camp, but he was easy to talk with for me. I also respected his attitude in serving God and other people. After the camp, I had a chance to communicate with him on Facebook. I was glad because I thought I could never meet him. Yusuke lived more than 700 miles away from me at that time. So I asked him, “How about marrying me?” Of course, I had known him very little, and he also had not known me very much. He was surprised at that, but he came over to my place to talk. I still remember that well. When we talked to each other, a thought suddenly came up into my mind: “Am I making use of him for the sake of my faith?” But he said, “Sure, please use me.” I thought he was very kind, and he is my husband now. We also understood our faith were very similar. So we decided to marry soon, and we got married about a year later. We have been married for more than 2 years now.

 

After I got married, I moved to Kobe, and I became a member of the Reformed Presbyterian Church. I thought my new life was wonderful, but 2 months after our wedding, I became sick, and I had to be in the bed almost all day over half a year. I often felt powerless, but my husband prayed for me and sustained me every day. The experience was hard for me, but that made me more thankful in serving God and my husband. After that, we came to Pittsburgh last year, and moved here this summer.

 

Many people often worry about me, because my life changed very much during a short time. But I'm always thankful to God for my experience, because I just walked the path as a Christian. I mean, my goal of serving God has never changed since I really met Jesus and realized my salvation through him.

 

At the end, I have prayer requests. Please pray for my family members who are non-believers. My younger sister used to go to church before she got married, but she married to a non-Christian husband, and she stopped going to the church. And my grandparents are serious Buddhists. Also Yusuke's father and his grandmother are non-Christians. So please pray for them.

Testimony: H. Hirata

Memorize the Catechism

          Years back, as I spoke to the Inter-Varsity Club at Swarthmore College, the discussion turned to prayer. What is it? I proposed this: “Prayer is an offering up of our desires unto God, for things agreeable to his will, in the name of Christ, with confession of our sins, and thankful acknowledgment of his mercies.” The reaction was so positive it was funny. “Can you say that again?” Out came the Swarthmore student pencils to get it down. No one suspected that my answer was not original with me, until I revealed that I was simply quoting the answer to Westminster Shorter Catechism Question 98, “What is prayer?”

 

Presbyterians used to memorize the Westminster Shorter Catechism word for word. However, after World War II, families and churches mostly dropped the practice. Why? 1) John Dewey’s hugely influential educational philosophy denigrated memorizing anything, insisting that inquiry, understanding, and knowing how to find information, should replace all “rote memorization.” 2) Memorizing is hard work, and children resist it, so it was convenient for parents to be told that they should not require it. 3) Daily family worship, where Catechism memorization once took place, faded away. 4) Churches grew suspicious of “doctrine,” averring along with prominent para-church groups that children should memorize only Scripture passages, not the Catechism.

 

At Broomall RPC in our afternoon service, and in our own family worship for many years, however, we memorized the Catechism, adults and children together. No reading was allowed, and public recitation in front of others was required. We did it for three reasons. 1) What generations of Christians found of great use is probably of great use, and should not be discarded without excellent reasons. Neither Dewey nor anyone else has provided excellent reasons to abandon memorizing the Catechism. 2) The Westminster Shorter Catechism, in precise words, outlines the Bible’s basic teachings and thus provides a sound framework for thinking about the most important questions of life. 3) Finally, the WSC summarizes the Church’s great battles with past heresies. It includes hidden instruction in church history. For example, my favorite question and answer – “Q21. Who is the only Redeemer of God’s elect? A. The only Redeemer of God’s elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man, and so was, and continueth to be, God and man in two distinct natures, and one Person, for ever.” – contains the 451 A.D. Council of Chalcedon definition of who Jesus Christ is (Nestorianism, Arianism, Docetism, Ebionitism, and Monophysitism refuted); teaches that we need a Redeemer (Pelagius refuted); teaches that God has his own elect (Arminianism refuted); and refutes the Gnostic denigration of human flesh, since the one Person, the Lord Jesus Christ, continues to be fully man, body and soul, for all eternity.

 

For most Christians, the Westminster Shorter Catechism provides a nearly full systematic theology. (It lacks direct teaching about marriage and the church.) Memorizing it verbatim at a young age, therefore, gives one a framework upon which to build biblical understanding throughout life. The material in the memory is there to be expanded, asked about, and easily accessed – because it is memorized. The answers also vaccinate memorizers against the infections of modern heretical preachers, who, like Satan, quote Scripture while repeating ancient errors.

 

Children, and adults, should also memorize Scripture, of course. It is not an either/or proposition, Catechism or Scripture. It never was.

 

The easiest time to memorize is when one is young, before puberty. Our ancestors in the faith were not fools or tyrants to make their children learn the Catechism. Contrary to Dewey and other modern educational faddists, memorizing is not a waste of time. Calculators, pocket computers (smartphones), and the Internet have not made it obsolete.

 

But will not children resist memorizing the Catechism? Of course they will! It is perfectly normal for children to try to escape hard work. So what? Children, whose parents memorize along with them, and who spend no more than five minutes each day during family worship memorizing the Catechism, will ordinarily learn to appreciate it.

 

“Q1. What is the chief end of man? A. Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.” Say that Q and A for a week, review it every night for a month, and it will belong to your child forever. She will know that she does not have to discover her purpose in life for herself, contra all varieties of existentialism. God has already given her his purpose. We are made for worship, God our Creator is the One whom we should worship, He is our delight, and we have an eternal destiny to be with Him. Here it is in one question and answer: the purpose driving life!

-- Bill Edgar

Catechism

Introduction to “From St. Paul's Home Town”

          Several years ago I was reading an article online when reference was made to a historian in Germany looking about in old Ottoman archives in Istanbul. He had come across a report of some missionaries kidnapping several Turkish girls and wanted to know more about it. I made a desultory effort to track down the historian in order to send to him an eyewitness account of what had happened, but I failed. The missionary in question was Dr. David Metheny, a Covenanter then working in the port city of Mersine on the northwest corner of the Mediterranean Sea opposite Cyprus. His daughter, Evangeline Metheny, wrote this account of what happened.

 

Before you read her account, a short glossary of place names and words that she uses might be helpful.

 

Tarsus – second location of Covenanter missionaries in Turkey besides Mersine. Long ago, it was the birthplace of Saul.

 

Alawites – a minority religious sect in mountainous Syria and nearby Turkey to whom Covenanter missionaries brought the Gospel (officially a Muslim sect, but so odd as to not really be Muslim at all; spelling varies in different sources; the present dictator Bashar al-Assad of Syria is an Alawite.)

 

Capitulations – treaties extorted from the Ottoman Turkish government in the 1800s by various European countries, some of which provided for better treatment of Turkey’s Christian minorities than was previously the case (greatly resented by Turks, of course) and others gave European nationals special privileges.

 

Hejaz in Arabia – the Muslim holy cities of Medina and Mecca and the area around them, controlled by the Ottoman Turks for 400 years until 1916.

 

Rhodes – largest of the Dodecanese islands with a storied history (site of the fabled Colossus statue) off the southwest corner of Turkey; controlled by the Ottomans from 1522 to 1912 when Italy took it over until 1947 when it became part of Greece.

 

Coming into the roads – old way to say that a ship sailed into a port.

 

Rode pillion – seated on a pad behind the rider of a horse; often side saddle (not safe and not easy on the rider or the horse).

 

Roweled – a rowel is the pointed disk on the end of a spur, meant for the horse, but a danger to the legs of someone riding pillion.

 

Vienna – beautiful capital of Austria today and the Catholic Austrian Empire before that, besieged by the Ottomans in 1529 (thereby allowing the Reformation to get fully established in parts of Germany) and again in 1683 (rescued by Polish cavalry).

 

The old days are gone – Evangeline’s conclusion, referring to the westernizing reforms of Mustafa Kemal; but current Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is bringing them back.

– Bill Edgar

 

From St. Paul's Home Town

By Evangeline Metheny

Reprint from the Covenanter Witness, 7/29/1936, pp. 66-68

          Once upon a time there were three little girls, Flower, Pure, and Snow. They were born and bred in Tarsus, but little they knew of the long history of their city. They only knew that there was mud, mud, mud in winter; dust, mosquitoes, and flies in summer; in their season sugar-cane, cotton, cabbages, monster cabbage roses; and also in their season the fragrant flowers and fruit of orange, lemon and citron trees. Also there were swarms of unwashed children – why attract the attention of evil spirits to your children by keeping them clean? And everywhere, in those good old days, were snarling, yelping, mangy curs; for it is unlucky to kill dogs, so the poor hungry creatures multiplied exceedingly.

 

These little girls had a fairy-story stepmother. With us the cruel stepmother is as rare as dragons or griffins. But out here she was tragically common. What can one expect when a child of eleven or twelve is haled away from her play and brought to an elderly husband’s house to drudge for three children? One day in a fit of temper this stepmother threw little Snow, who was learning to talk, into water deep enough to drown her. Some one got Snow out, but the shock struck her dumb, for good and all. As time went on things got no better. At last the harassed father brought her to the Mission School in Mersine. So there he placed his children with Miss Sterrett who is now Mrs. Balph. When the dumb child was about six, we were going to America, so my father [Dr. David Metheny] got permission from Snow’s father to take Snow to America to put her in a school for mutes. She learned to read and write and when she was grown up married a man who was deaf or dumb or both, and in America she stayed until her death some years ago.

 

Flower and Pure stayed on in the Mersine boarding school very happily for some years. Then a sister of their father’s found that she could do herself a good turn by marrying the girls off to men who would reward her. The father did not want this at all. If my memory serves me, the elder girl’s suitor had a wife and the father did not want his daughter to marry a man who already had a wife whom he might prefer to the new wife, once the novelty had worn off. Anyhow, he wanted them to stay on at school, even though according to the customs of his people he would get a big money gift from each son-in-law. He begged Miss Sterrett and my father not to let the girls leave school or go anywhere with their aunt.

 

This aunt herself was a former mission school pupil, but she was of the Simon-the-Sorcerer sort [see Acts 8:9-25]. She had professed a change of heart and belief and had fooled the missionaries finely in her youth. Indeed after all the events that I am going to tell you of, she fooled a new generation of them just as she had the others. But from the time I was a small child “unto this present,” she had always made my flesh creep. Not being able to persuade her brother to let her marry off his girls, she made a religious matter of it and a political one, too. She brought it about that complaints were laid that my father was forcibly holding the girls and was compelling them to turn Christian. I think I did not say that they belonged to a sect of peculiar beliefs who call themselves Moslems but who hold tenets that are abhorrent to orthodox Moslems [the family are Alawites. -ed.]. Among these is the belief that one may profess whatever religion is most convenient, at the same time continuing to practice his own religion in secret. “Religious profession,” they say, “is a garment. One may change his garments as best suits him, but is not thereby affected inwardly.” Whenever it suited them to call themselves Moslems to get Moslem sympathy, they did so. Thus it was in this case. In spite of the father’s steadfast refusal to have his girls removed from the school, the aunt managed to enlist the sympathies of the government of that time (back in the last century [19th C]), and my father was officially notified to hand them over to their father.

 

Now in those days the Capitulations were still in force. These were concessions wrested from Turkey in the old, old days when her magnificent and far-reaching power, built up by Sultan Selim the Grim, and his son, Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, was waning. I wonder how many of those who read this know the story of this David and Solomon of the Turkish Empire. In 1517 – the same year in which Luther nailed up his famous Theses in German – Selim the Grim took Aleppo and marching south conquered all Syria, Egypt, also the Hejaz in Arabia. His son took Irak [Iraq] in the East, and, in the West, Rhodes, which was held by the knights of St. John; and he all but took Vienna in 1529. The story of their conquests and of the naval actions won by Sulieman’s great admiral, Khayr-ed-Din Barbarossa, is thrilling. I see I have not told about their conquest of Algiers, another jewel in the Ottoman crown. The Turkish Empire was enormous and Europe held the Turkish power in great awe. Then bit by bit, century after century, the powers of Europe gained ground. Little by little they wrested this concession and that from Turkey, and claimed special privileges for their nationals in Turkey. These were the famous Capitulations. They were shamefully abused by many foreigners and it is no wonder that they have been swept away. However, in those days, when Turkey was still an illiterate nation ruled by caprice, the Capitulations could be made to serve the ends of justice by decent foreigners. Americans were classed with Europeans.

 

One of the privileges of European nationals resident in Turkey was that the Turkish tribunals had no jurisdiction over them. If they were accused of breaking the laws of Turkey, the Turkish government reported the cases to the consul of the accused, and he negotiated the matter through his embassy. The Turkish police could not enter a foreigner’s domicile. As I said, it was a fine state of affairs for foreign rascals, and one that the Turkish Republic now refuses to tolerate. However, such was the law at the time of my story.

 

The town authorities ordered policemen to enter the school premises, but they were afraid to try it. At last the Governor of the Province came in person from the town where his residence was, to superintend the actual digging of a breach in the wall of the school. The men that he had with him tapped the wall here and tapped it there, listening for a good spot. Some of our family watched all this with deep interest from a balcony. At last the order was given to break through. “And what is the name of this man into whose premises I am to break through?” asked the military officer, who was entrusted with carrying out the governor’s order. They gave him the name. “That name?” said he. “I was sent into exile for years and demoted because I forcibly entered his premises in Latakia. No. Excuse me. You will have to find someone else to carry out that order.”

 

Of course my father did not know of all this conversation at the time. He was expecting trouble. Already the American representative at Constantinople, for so Istanbul was called in those days, had wired my father an uncoded open telegram. “Deliver up girls and telegraph me particulars.” I shall not give the name of that man. Suffice it to say that it was neither Oscar Strauss nor Henry Morgenthau. To this my father replied by letter, saying, among other things, that the girls in question had been handed over to him voluntarily by their father, who most urgently asked him to keep them. My father said that by all the unwritten laws of the East the girls were his. That if he so chose, he might even take them as brides for his sons. And this was true though Father certainly was not contemplating such a step. One member of the Mission, I remember, wrote out a telegram and tried to get my father to send it to the American Representative in Constantinople, as follows: “Curb your insolence and wait until better informed.” I remember the exact wording. Father thought the telegram suggested not sufficiently diplomatic. So it was not sent.

 

Just when tension was highest, that day the U.S.S. San Francisco appeared in the offing. At that time our men of war were white and easily distinguished from a distance. And presently the flag was plain to be seen. My father at once dismissed a messenger to inform the governor of our town that an American warship was coming into the roads, and to say that doubtless the governor would wish to make the usual preparations for receiving it. I cannot remember whether it was before or after the message was sent that we made out a Rear Admiral’s flag. Father sent no message to the Governor of the Province, as officially he had no cognizance of his presence in town, though he had unofficially seen him making preparations to break into our premises. Father was always “correct” in such matters. We heard afterwards that the Governor of the Province had betaken himself unceremoniously to the railway station and demanded to be sent to his own city. “But your Excellency will wait till we can get your own special coach ready?” No, he did not wait. The rank of the Governor of our town entitled him to a salute of 13 guns. The Governor of the Province got 19 guns from foreign warships.

 

The Governor of the town received the officers of the San Francisco with all due formalities, and doubtless returned the call as is the custom. I only suppose that he did, because it is always done. I do not remember hearing anything about it. It was our energetic Consul Gibson, American Consul General in Beyrouth [Beirut], who had seen the thing through and got the warship sent. A servant of Lord Curzon once described him to me as “a very testy gentleman.” At least that much could be said about the admiral who came on that occasion. He had the horse-races in Palermo on his brain, and to be torn away from them by a piece of naval duty went against the grain. And the grain was rough, anyhow. Further, he had a fine confidence in his own thoroughly Anglo-Saxon French and scorned interpreters. He sent for the Governor General of the Province and spoke his mind to him in his own remarkable sort of French; which by all I was told by his own officers was English literally translated into French words pronounced with a fine United States accent, and well interlarded with untranslated English oaths. Of course as a young lady in a drawing room, I never saw this side of the admiral, so I can only go on hearsay.

 

The upshot was that there was no more question of the premises being entered. On the other hand, so that everything should be fair and square, my father was instructed to take the girls to Tarsus to their own father there to say before witnesses whether they chose to stay with their father or to come back to school. Mrs. Kennedy, then Jennie Dodds (dates these events to c.1894), was in charge of the school with Miss Sterrett, and it fell to her to take the girls home, which she did. They made their open choice to go back to school with her. I rather think they were there until 1897. From time to time they were bothered by the aunt or her emissaries. There was always the danger of her having them kidnapped. Once when it was time to go to the hills to escape the heat of summer Miss Dodds had to take the girls up by night for fear of the aunt’s interference. The younger girl rode pillion behind one of the teachers. She arrived with her legs badly roweled. When I asked her how she had got them cut up like that she said that the stirrups were the old Turkish sort with a square, sharp-cornered piece of metal under the foot. Riders used the sharp corners as spurs. The teacher, urging forward the horse to get the journey safely over, had kicked steadily, supposing the stirrup-corners were spurring the horse’s flanks. But it was the girls’ legs that got them. As I looked at her raw and bleeding calves I asked her in bewilderment, “Why didn’t you tell the teacher he was kicking you?” “It would have been a shame,” answered Pure. I think that my interest in her affairs cooled from that moment. It did seem to my young intolerance that a girl who was so modest that she would let her legs be kicked to ribbons all of an eighteen mile ride was really not worth the rumpus that was being made about her.

 

In the long run, the girls married men of their own choice, of their father’s faith, and so far as I have ever heard were happy in their choice.

 

I have written this article, checking it up with Mrs. Kennedy, because my father has already passed into legend. People in these countries tell me the wildest tales of his swift riding, his miraculous cures, his last words. Missionaries who have come to the country since my father’s day have no way of checking up on these tales, unless they pass possibility; for I think no story about my father could be stranger, more out of the ordinary than thing after thing that he really did. Twice recently inaccurate reports of this matter have been given at home, so I give you the story as one who was present and very much alive, indeed, while it was all going on.

 

It all happened over forty years ago. In the interval the girl’s father and mine, and two of the girls themselves have died – though the wicked aunt lives on. The consul and the admiral have been dead this many a year.

 

The famous – and sometimes infamous – Capitulations have been swept away with the broom of civilization. Tarsus has a wonderful new park all sweet with roses, and close by the Municipal Cinema. Everywhere are unveiled girls and women rejoicing in a new liberty. The old days are gone.

From Paul's Hometown

Another Anne Frank

          I grew up with Jewish friends, from kindergarten in the Bronx to graduate school. Sometimes we argued religion. Once in eighth grade, Mark Ebel, who sat right in front of me in every class, was complaining about Hebrew School, which he had to attend after school. “What’s so great about David?” he asked rhetorically, giving a short account of David and Bathsheba, concluding, “I don’t believe in God.” As we were arguing about his newfound atheism, the teacher suddenly interrupted. “Bill, it’s your turn to read the Bible today.” I had forgotten. “Mark, what should I read?” I asked. “Psalm 14,” he said, pulling the number out of the air. So I went forward, opened to Psalm 14, and began reading. “The fool has said in his heart, ‘There is no God.’”

 

The backdrop to my Jewish friends’ existence in the 1960s was the Holocaust. I shared their enthusiasm for the novel, Exodus, about Jews in Cyprus trying to get to Israel. In the United States, there was not the history of Jew Hatred that Europe had, and my Jewish friends felt relatively safe here, even though anti-Semitism has not been entirely absent from our country. The Second Klu Klux Klan targeted Catholics and Jews, along with Blacks. This Klan had real success in the North: Indiana’s governor in 1925 and a majority of the state legislature were Klan members, for example.

 

Disdain for Jews has always tempted Gentile Christians. Paul had to remind the Roman church that Israel is the olive tree, and we Gentiles are only grafted in branches. “You do not support the root, but the root supports you,” he wrote (Romans 11:18).

 

Where does empowered anti-Semitism lead? Extensive excerpts from the newly discovered diary of Renia Spiegel (the “Anne Frank” of Poland), remind us of the horrors committed against Jews within living memory. You will cry before you finish it. The final entry is, “God, into your hands I commit myself. You will help me, Bulus [her mother] and God.” https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/hear-o-israel-save-us-renia-spiegel-diary-english-translationholocaust-poland-180970536/

-- Bill Edgar

Another A. Frank

Thoughtful Questions I've Been Asked During the Past Month

1. I don’t like the parable of the Prodigal Son. How is it fair to show favoritism to the younger brother while the older brother has done everything he should?

          This question came from a Jewish college junior who has begun to read the Gospels. Our conversation went something as follows:

 

Me: “Have you read the two previous parables about the lost sheep and the lost coin? What would you do if you had a hundred sheep and lost one?”

She: “I wouldn’t worry about it.”

 

Me: “You’re such an American. How about if you had ten collectible coins and lost one. Would you look for it?”

She: “I might.”

 

Me: “Imagine this family. It’s the Middle East, so they don’t live alone on a farmstead; they live in a village, where everyone knows them. When the younger son asks for his share of the inheritance, it means he wants his father dead. His request is outrageous and brings great shame on the family, especially the father.”

She: “Yes, exactly. He is a horrible person.”

 

Me: “And when he comes to his senses, he is humble and only wants to be one of his father’s servants when he comes home. But his father runs through the village to embrace him and welcome him home, thus taking his son’s shame on himself. Imagine what the village would think of a father who did that.”

She: “Yes, so why did he do that?”

 

Me: “It is a parable of mercy and love for lost people. Jesus is teaching that God welcomes everyone who comes to him, no matter how bad, and he takes the shame on himself that we have earned.”

She: “Okay, but what about the elder brother? He did everything right. Is he being treated fairly?”

 

Me: “Are there really any such older brothers, or only ones who think they are?”

She: “Okay, thank you for talking with me about it.”

 

   Copy Editor's note: You may also be interested in John Edgar's 6/16/2019 sermon on the Prodigal Son:

        https://tinyurl.com/y5qnflhu

 

2. Where does the Reformed Presbyterian Church stand on…?

          At the closing dinner of my wife’s 50th Swarthmore College class reunion, I sat next to the wife of a just retired Presbyterian minister, both also Swarthmore alums. We had a long, civil conversation excerpted below.

 

She: “Now that Jack is retired, I feel it is my turn to choose our church. What we say in church means less and less to me, and none of our four children – and they are the children of a pastor! – have stayed. I feel all religions, the Hindus and the Buddhists too, talk about the same god in their own language as Christians do, and I have great respect for all of them. We’re going to go to a Unitarian Church now, where we can explore what we feel. I am tired of fighting about what’s right and wrong.”

Me: “Oh, I was a Presbyterian pastor for a long time, nearby in Broomall.”

 

She: “What church?”

Me: “Reformed Presbyterian. It has Scottish origins like all Presbyterian Churches. It comes from people who refused to accept the 1689 settlement and stayed out of the established Kirk of Scotland. In this country, we were always more theologically conservative than the immigrant Church of Scotland Presbyterians and also more socially radical, always anti-racist and anti-slavery. The first thing you would notice if you came into our church is that we don’t have either contemporary worship with a band or traditional worship with an organ or piano. We are pre-modern. We sing the Psalms a capella, the way the 17th Century Presbyterians all did.” 

 

She: “Do you have a choir?”

Me: “No.”

 

She: “What do you mean by more theologically conservative?”

Me: “We hold the Apostles’ Creed in its plain meaning and the Westminster Standards.”

 

She: “I feel we should live the way Jesus told us to live – accept everyone just the way they are, take care of the poor, and welcome immigrants. What do you feel about gay marriage?”

Me: “It is an impossibility. Two men can be life-long friends, live together, and even share their finances. But they can’t marry.”

 

She: “So you think sex between them is wrong?”

Me: “Yes. Sex is for married men and women. Sex between two men is just sterile foolishness.”

 

She: “What would you say if one of your sons came and said to you, ‘Dad, I’m gay’?”

Me: “I know my sons and cannot imagine any of them saying that.”

 

She: “Yes, but what if one did?”

Me: “I would say, ‘I’m sorry you feel the temptation of having sex with another man. It’s not a temptation I have ever felt, so I don’t understand it, any more than I understand the temptation to commit suicide, but I know it’s a temptation some people have. It’s a temptation you have to resist, just as you resist other temptations to sin.’ ”

 

She: “So you put it in the category of temptation?”

Me: “Yes, not in the category of identity. By the way, do you read the Bible?”

 

She: “I hear what’s in the lectionary every week at church. What do you think about abortion?”

Me: “It is murder.”

 

She: “What about a woman who is pregnant from rape or incest?”

Me: “Is it right to kill a third person because one or two other people did wrong? Actually, we don’t talk about these issues all that much in our church.”

 

She: “Why is that?”

Me: “Because we agree on them. Our focus is on more basic things. We teach that Jesus is really the Son of God, he really did die and return to life after three days, and everyone is really going to have to deal with him at the end of time.”

 

She: “Well, I feel this forgiveness of sins thing just doesn’t mean much to me anymore.”

Me: “Have you noticed that the four Gospels devote between a fourth and a third of their content to Jesus’ death and resurrection?”

 

She: “Yes, it’s quite a good story. But I can’t make any sense out of talk about a resurrection.”

 

Our conversation went on to the difference between guilt feelings and actual guilt, with my question being, “What are you going to do about your guilt? Only Jesus can really deal with it.” She indulged in a few smirks directed to others at our table of eight, presumably at my Neanderthal outlook. I made a deliberate effort to steer the conversation away from today’s hot button ethical issues and towards matters of truth about Jesus and eternal matters. Her husband, who sat on her other side, resolutely stayed out of our conversation, never saying a word or giving any indication he was even aware we were talking for half an hour. He and I never exchanged a word. Meanwhile, I noticed an old friend of ours across the table listening intently, especially when we got beyond gay marriage and abortion and on to Jesus. He gets our Christmas letter every year, so he knows we are orthodox believers.

-- Bill Edgar

Thoughtful Questions

The Earthy Bible

 

          I heard of a grandmother who told her grandchildren to be careful reading the Bible because it is “a dirty book.” It is certainly earthy, giving honest answers to real-world issues, including indelicate ones. It is not for Gnostics or their imitators who only want to deal with “spiritual” things, and despise the flesh of which we are made.

 

When I was quite young, the Scriptures sometimes confused me. The archaic language of the King James Version caused some of my confusion. Jesus healed a man who was sick and “borne of four.” (Mark 2:3) Not realizing the difference between born and borne, I imagined this poor fellow had some strange deformity from birth - maybe four arms?

 

Other problems stemmed from my ignorance of adult biology. For example, three Gospels include the story of a woman who was healed when she touched Jesus’ cloak. (Matthew 9, Mark 5, Luke 8) She had an “issue of blood” for twelve years. If she was wounded and didn’t clot, why didn’t she die from blood loss, I wondered? I knew about hemophilia before I understood menstruation. Looking back, I think I would have benefited from some explanations of the more “coarse” things in Holy Writ.

 

Some people, like the grandmother who called the Bible “a dirty book,” are more fastidious than God. In Bible College, I had more than one professor who went so far as to tell us that some Scripture passages should not be read aloud in public. The texts with which we had trolled him (to use a popular current term) were the six Old Testament references to males as those who “piss against a wall.” “So and more also do God unto the enemies of David, if I leave of all that pertain to him by the morning light any that pisseth against the wall.” (I Samuel 25:22, KJV) The NIV politely translates, “May God deal with David, be it ever so severely, if by morning I leave alive one male of all who belong to him!”

 

Even if we want to avoid the word “piss,” which has acquired a vulgar connotation since the King James Bible was translated, we could still translate “whoever urinates against the wall.” The LORD himself uses the same expression to refer to males:

"But [thou] hast done evil above all that were before thee: for thou hast gone and made thee other gods, and molten  images, to provoke me to anger, and hast cast me behind thy back: Therefore, behold, I will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam, and will cut off from Jeroboam him that pisseth against the wall, and him that is shut up and left in Israel, and will take away the remnant of the house of Jeroboam, as a man taketh away dung, till it be all gone. Him that dieth of Jeroboam in the city shall the dogs eat; and him that dieth in the field shall the fowls of the air eat: for the Lord hath spoken it." (I Kings 14:9-11, KJV)

 

          We may not like a God who calls manure “dung,” or threatens his enemies with being dog food, or describes males by their special pissing abilities. But that’s the earthy, blunt God of the Bible, the One who made us from the dust of the earth. Personally, I’d rather embrace the True God, who meets me in the dirt where I am, than put up with Bible professors who won’t allow me to read out loud from the King James Bible, the only version they approved.

 

A different professor told us that unmarried people should not read the Song of Songs – too sexually explicit. So much for all Scripture being useful to edify us! But at least this professor was honest about what the Canticles contains. This unique book expresses both allegory and marital intimacy, and one cannot understand the allegory without understanding the intimacy. Even the passages that speak most mystically about the union of our Savior and his Church parallel it with the one flesh union of actual husbands and wives - For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church. (Ephesians 5:29) The Bible’s metaphors and analogies depend for their meaning on mundane reality. Our Lord told Nicodemus about a new birth knowing that Nicodemus already knew about physical birth. John wrote about the second death because we already know about a first one. A new heavens and a new earth would puzzle us if we didn’t know the first ones existed.

 

The poetry of the Song of Songs puzzled me for years. I learned, as a boy, that the rhymes in Hebrew are made of ideas, not sounds, which helped me grasp Psalms and Proverbs, but not the Song of Songs. With some stretching, I can picture long flowing hair as a flock of goats descending a mountain, but what is one to make of such oddities as these: Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies? (4:5) Your temples behind your veil are like the halves of a pomegranate. (6:7) When I finally learned that Hebrew metaphor describes things in terms of all five senses, the mystery was unlocked. Any child who has been to a petting zoo can get it that dad might like to touch mom, or taste her cheek as he kisses her. Reading Canticles with this in mind - that the poet is touching, smelling, and hearing, as well as seeing, was a revelation. It was also further evidence that the Holy Spirit who inspired the Bible is no blushing Victorian.

 

I will share one more story of Puritans purer than the Bible. I was at a home Bible study that included families with members of all ages. Our routine practice was to read a whole chapter of Scripture, and then discuss it. When we got to Genesis 38, about how Judah unwittingly fathered twins by his daughter-in-law Tamar pretending to be a prostitute, the man who read it aloud shut down all discussion, saying something like, “Let’s not touch that stuff.” So we moved on. Is it a shocking and shameful story? Indeed. Did God know what he was doing when he put in the Bible? Most certainly! Would I rather have my children hear these things among mature believers than on the ball field? Absolutely.

 

Any parent who reads the Bible with his or her children is going to come across blunt and beastly stuff. The Holy Scriptures are a guidebook to real life in a fallen world, and the Book is an honest book. It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret, so the Bible does not dwell on detailed descriptions of sinful behavior (Ephesians 5:12) Nevertheless, ...the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law. (Deuteronomy 29:29) Any topic God saw fit for special revelation is not unfit for our understanding, not even Ezekiel 23:20.

-- Scott Rocca

The Earthy Bible

White Lake Camp: The Early Years

 

          About a hundred years ago, America’s urban population exceeded its rural population. It wasn’t that people wanted to live in cities, but that was where economic opportunity lay. Many wanted to be back in the country and feared that their children would lose rural skills, so Boy Scout camping flourished, and so did summer camps of all kinds. Churches too began holding summer conferences for city members as well as rural ones in rural outdoor places.

 

The New York, Philadelphia, and Rochester Presbyteries of the Covenanter Church in 1920 held a Young People’s Conference at a place whose very name evokes rural America: Bovina, New York, near Walton, N.Y. Here is an account of the conference.

 

"The Young People’s Conference at Bovina, New York, was a pronounced success from every point of view. The attendance was large…. There were 105 outside delegates besides the 45 from the Bovina congregation. Three congregations tied in numbers present: White Lake, Walton, and Syracuse, each having fourteen, most of them traveling by auto. Eighteen came from the Philadelphia congregations…there were a number of missionaries…Dr. John Peoples [later Broomall elder], of Turkey was there; from China were Dr. and Mrs. E. J. M. Dickson and Miss Ella Margaret Stewart; from the Jewish Mission in Philadelphia, Miss Emma K. McFarland….Dr. R. J. G. McKnight represented the Seminary. Rev. J. D. Edgar, the secretary of the Young People’s Work, was there from Olathe, [Kansas].

 

While most of the time was given over to meetings, there being but three days, the finest picnic ever was arranged for Thursday in Mitchell Park, down in a beautiful ravine, through which the water flowed over terrace after terrace of rocks. One never would tire of that waterfall… The picnic ended with an enthusiastic ball game which was greatly enjoyed despite the fact that the captain of the winning team, Mr. Paul Christner of Montclair, N. J., was awarded with a broken nose.

 

…The spiritual benefits of the convention were even greater [than the social ones]. The call of the Blue Banner and the Covenants of Scotland resounded over and over and the young people responded loyally… Dr. S. A. S. Metheny…had charge of the music and one could feel the influence of the convention on the hearts of the young people by the soul they put into their singing… Each service was begun with devotions with topics such as these: The Obligations of Youth, Take My Yoke Upon You, The Christian’s Confidence… Other splendid addresses were given…on “Secret Societies,”…and “The Folly of Spiritism.” Seven essays were read on…Elijah, Jonathan, Ruth, Jonah, Moses, Paul, and David. … The [judges] gave the most points to Arthur Faris, of Cambridge.

 

The following officers were elected for the new year: President, Ralph Alexander, of Walton; vice president, Robert McClay of Third Philadelphia.

 

Dr. John Peoples, just returned from Turkey, told of his terrible war experiences in that country where he was practicing in a military hospital during those days. [By caring for German soldiers, he kept the hospital safe.] Dr. Dickson made the work in China very real to us, and told of the recent revival over there and the direct answers to prayer.

 

An inspiring symposium was held one night on Ministry as a Life Work. Rev. John H. Pritchard, pastor of White Lake, gave as the reasons for entering the ministry: 1st He wanted to make the best possible investment of his life. Next, the Call. He began to hear the Call when just a little boy…until he knows that “Woe is me if I preach not the Gospel.” [I Cor 9:16]

 

Rev. J. D. Edgar gave a heart-searching address on “Your Bodies a Living Sacrifice.” He made a wonderful plea for the young people to make the 13 A Little Strength sacrifice and to consecrate their lives to the service of the Master – a living sacrifice, giving as the characteristics of such a sacrifice: a living being, godliness; consecration; sacrifice… After the close of his inspiring call, young folks rose all over the church, dedicating their lives to the Lord. …four young men and one young girl responded [to a call to the ministry and the foreign field].

 

Oh! It was a spiritual convention…. The young people went for a good social time and found far better."

(Christian Nation, 9/1/1920, p. 7).

 

In 1922 the Bovina Young People’s Conference became the White Lake Encampment. John H. Pritchard, longtime pastor of the White Lake RPC and also helper of his father in putting out the weekly Christian Nation, the main periodical of the RP Church then, instigated the move. White Lake was closer to rail transportation since it was in a favorite NYC vacation area, Sullivan County, NY. Here is the first notice of White Lake Camp.

 

"Montclair, N. J. March 17, 1922.

 

Dear Friends: Following the announcement of the TriPresbyterial Encampment to be held August 4th to 14th at White Lake, New York, there is immediate necessity for funds to provide permanent camp equipment that will be used from year to year. But this will, fortunately, be a small matter, for at White Lake we will not be required to provide chairs, tables, cook tent, mess tent, or meeting tent; nor dishes. White Lake congregation has a well-equipped kitchen and dining hall, and the splendid church building is itself in the very heart of the campsite. Back of the church on a gently rising hill is a large level plateau for sleeping tents, open-air gatherings and games… Immediately in front of the church building is White Lake, with bathing, boating, fishing, etc. and in every direction are hikes, and promenades and resting places of infinite variety and charm. No kind of weather that is possible in August in the delectable mountains of peerless Sullivan County can take us by surprise or find us unprepared. Imagination cannot picture a more perfect camp-site. Two thousand dollars will be more than sufficient for every needed additional equipment for one hundred people. …[W]ill the young people of your congregation at once appoint a committee to raise funds…Now let us all get together and boost the camp and start the funds rolling in, and then invite as many as the funds will provide for, to a rousing convention, the biggest and best yet.

 

Sincerely, Paul J. Christner, Chairman of Finance Committee."

(Christian Nation, 3/29/1922, p. 6).

 

The new encampment needed advertising. Here is the first advertisement in the Christian Nation, June 14, 1922, p. 12.

?

WHY NOT

SPEND YOUR VACATION AT

THE

COVENANTER CAMP

WHITE LAKE, N.Y.,

AUGUST 4 TO 14

WHY SO

GREAT SPORT More than eight

hours a day for baseball, basketball….

Magnificent View Mountain lakes, valleys,

wildwood and farm land….

Good Meals and Tents –

REASONABLE COST –

Fifteen Dollars for Ten Days

 

FINE PROGRAM

[Two evenings of entertainment; addresses by eight

different preachers; contest papers from young

people’s societies]

 

GOOD COMPANY

The members of the Tri-Presbyterial C.Y.P.U.

are the salt of the earth.

 

          How to get to the Camp? The Christian Nation, August 2, 1922, gave detailed directions. Railroad Route – The only railroad…is the Ontario & Western…reaching Liberty….” Automobile Route -- For those travelling from New York: The best road is the state road leading through Suffern, N. Y., just across the Jersey line, and thence through Sloatburg, Tuxedo, Chester, Goshen, Middletown, Bloomingburg, Wurtsboro, and Monticello. At Monticello, follow the stone road through the village, turn with the improved road at the monument, and about oneeighth of a mile west of the village the first stone road on the left hand leads to White Lake, eight and one-half miles, and 98 miles from New York.”

 

Equally detailed directions for those coming from the west came next.

 

So how did the first White Lake Camp fare? The Christian Nation (9/13/1922, pp. 89) reported that the ten-day camp was great. They ate in the White Lake Church basement, rather than a tent. That was great. The site, described in detail, was beautiful. “The campers were housed in ten large tents, 16x21 feet… Six tents were occupied by girls, four by boys. These tents were pitched on platforms that afforded firm and dry flooring. Twelve beds of home manufacture were placed in each tent…. But although the opportunity was given, there is reason to believe that some campers found difficulty in sleeping. There were those who averred that the bottom fell out of the thermometer that night.” The morning session lasted from 9:00 until 11:30. Lunch was at noon. The afternoon was for sports, games, and hiking. Dinner was at 5:45. The evening program began at 7:30. Lights were out at 10:45. The speakers were W. J. Coleman, W. J. McKnight, R. J. G. McKnight, Delber H. Elliott, A. A. Wylie and many more. There was a consecration service the last night, “on the alabaster box of precious ointment that might have been sold, but was instead given to the service of Christ. Are we to sell our lives to the highest bidder, or shall we do as did the woman with the alabaster box?” Campers roasted marshmallows on the campfire and took a moonlight canoe trip on White Lake. About one hundred fifty attended in all.

 

A later article will note that after fifteen years, people grew tired of the tents, so in 1936 fund-raising for cabins began. The camp repaid the money it had borrowed to buy its thirteen acres. A thrice-daily trip down the hill to eat in the church basement also grew tiresome, so in 1946 Bob Edgar, pastor of the New York City RPC helped organize building the dining hall with lumber from an old White Lake hotel. Governance of the Camp involving three Presbyteries proved troublesome, with two appeals about control made to the Synod. But these developments belonged to the future. John H. Pritchard of White Lake founded the camp and then lived there in what is still sometimes called the “Pritchard house.” He began the Camp with a happy mixture of Romantic love of nature, American boosterism, and spiritual fervor.

-- Bill Edgar

White Lake Camp

Reflections on the Atlantic Presbytery Youth Retreat

 

          Beginning May 31st and ending June 2nd, the Elkins Park Reformed Presbyterian Church had the privilege of hosting a young people's retreat for the first time in several years. This retreat was for grades 7 to 12 and had a wonderful and encouraging turnout. Almost 30 young people attended, hailing from all across Atlantic Presbytery: from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia, from Rhode Island to Beaver Falls.

 

Of course, this retreat would not have been dreamt up, except for the energy and passion of Violet and Kyle Finley, who are the Youth Ministries Committee of Synod’s representatives in the Atlantic Presbytery. They were responsible for pulling together staff and ensuring the retreat’s success from start to finish. They were essentially responsible for every aspect of planning.

 

There was some difficulty finding counselors at the start, but God graciously provided and built up a workable staff. Larry Gladfelter ran the kitchen downstairs with an iron fist and supplied all hungry mouths with delicious meals and treats.

 

Ben Goerner was responsible for six boys ages 15 to 18, and Duran Perkins for seven boys ages 12 to 14. Olivia Alexander was the counselor for eight girls 15 to 18, while Willow and Wren Jessop tag-teamed to manage seven girls 11 to 14. All the boys slept in the church while the girls enjoyed their sleepovers in Elder Perkins' family home.

 

Joel Ward was the main speaker. Coming all the way from College Hill RPC in Pittsburgh, he provided the weekend’s Biblical and spiritual focus. His topic was Called for this Time from Eternity: Hearing God’s Command to do Hard Work, and his three lectures revolved around our vocational calling as Christians and the different stages therein. The main book Mr. Ward chose from the Bible to help hone our thoughts on vocational calling and all that entails was the book of Daniel. Using Daniel and his incredible experiences as an example, we worked though the concepts of being TAKEN by God, being TRIED by God, and then receiving TRUE wealth from God.

 

Overall, the retreat was encouraging to all who attended. The Elkins Park congregation also found it uplifting to meet and talk to the variety of youth from all around the presbytery.

-- Wren Jessop

Youth Retreat

A Little Help?

 

          Your support helps keep this publication in print, by providing for printing, mailing, and a tiny stipend for layout. It will also help us create and maintain a website version of the journal. None of the authors or editors receive anything. If you appreciate what you read here and would like to help us keep going, send your contribution to A Little Strength, 901 Cypress Avenue, Elkins Park PA 19027.  Or you can contribute online by clicking here.

"Watch This Space!"

          We've been asked numerous times whether we have, or will have, an Internet presence. So far, our answer has been “eventually...?” We are now happy to almost announce our new website, which will include all our old issues. It's not quite ready for prime time, but we've secured the name www.alittlestrength.org, and our tech-wise young friends are hard at work re-formatting the paper and ink into electrons, zeros, and ones.

A Little Help?

Authors in this Issue

Bill Edgar is a retired pastor of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia).

 

John Edgar is the pastor of Elkins Park RPC (Philadelphia).

 

Honami Hirata attended Elkins Park RPC 2018-19 while her husband studied at Westminster Seminary.

 

Wren Jessop is a member of Elkins Park RPC, and a student at Montgomery County Community College studying physical therapy.

 

Evangeline Metheny was a former member of Second Philadelphia and missionary; see her story in the 2.2 issue of A Little Strength.

 

Scott Rocca is a member of Hazleton RPC.

Authors
bottom of page