top of page

Volume 3: Issue 1 | February 2020

OK, Boomer!
Explanation of the 5th Commandment

"Honor your father and your mother,

that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you."

-- Exodus 20:12

          “OK Boomer” has gone viral on the Internet in the past few months. It’s a simple expression used by those under the age of 40 (Millennials and GenZ) to dismiss whatever those over sixty, “Baby Boomers,” say. The term picked up steam recently after an incident in New Zealand’s parliament, when a young member rudely dismissed the comments of an older member. For those who remember the 1960s slogan, “Don’t trust anyone over thirty,” the “OK Boomer” dismissal of the 1960s generation is almost amusingly ironic. In both cases, however, the Fifth Commandment to honor mother and father applies, especially to the tone of generational conflict.

 

Never mind the supposed issues between “Boomers” and “Millennials.” Let’s address the relevance of the Ten Commandments to the tone of the conflict. Paul told a younger man, Timothy, to treat older people respectfully. “Do not rebuke an older man, but exhort him as a father, younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, younger women as sisters, with all purity.” (I Timothy 5:1-2) These verses mean that Millenials should treat Boomers with respect. Why? Precisely because they are older! But wait! Boomers should treat Millennials with respect, just as Timothy had to treat younger men as brothers and young women as sisters.

 

So, is it appropriate for Millennials to dismiss the aged with the rude retort, “OK Boomer”? No! In fact, this is a great and foolish sin. As Jesus taught, “For God commanded, saying, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘Whoever reviles father or mother must surely die.’ ” (Matthew 15:4) The foolishness is revealed in the fact that older people are, in fact, usually wiser than younger ones. Rehoboam, for example, lost his kingdom when he blew off the advice of his father’s counselors and went with the advice of young men like himself. (See I Kings 12)

 

Respect must go both ways, young to old, and old to young. Millennials should avoid the rude, “OK Boomer,” and Boomers should not mock younger folk as “Snowflakes.” The Fifth Commandment forbids the sin of disregard and mockery to young and old alike, as the Westminster Larger Catechism teaches.

 

"Q. 128. What are the sins of inferiors against their superiors?

A: The sins of inferiors against their superiors are, all neglect of the duties required toward them; envying at, contempt of, and rebellion against their persons and places, in their lawful counsels, commands, and corrections; cursing, mocking, and all such refractory and scandalous carriage, as proves a shame and dishonor to them and their government."

"Q. 130. What are the sins of superiors?

A: The sins of superiors are, besides the neglect of the duties required of them, an inordinate seeking of themselves, their own glory, ease, profit, or pleasure; commanding things unlawful, or not in the power of inferiors to perform; counseling, encouraging, or favoring them in that which is evil; dissuading, discouraging, or discountenancing them in that which is good; correcting them unduly; careless exposing, or leaving them to wrong, temptation, and danger; provoking them to wrath; or any way dishonoring themselves, or lessening their authority, by an unjust, indiscreet, rigorous, or remiss behavior."

 

What am I getting at? Simply this: the “OK Boomer” attitude is not okay! Young people need to listen to and respect their elders. And elders need to listen to, care for, and be worthy of the respect, of the younger.

-- Paul Brace

OK, Boomer!

Tame Your Tweets:

Proverbs Exposition

"When words are many, transgression is not lacking,

but whoever restrains his lips is prudent."

-- Proverbs 10:19

          Do you impulsively blurt out thoughts? When your words cause trouble, do you nevertheless congratulate yourself on being “genuine,” or “real?” Solomon simply calls you “imprudent.”

 

Words have power, so, like a gun, they should be used with care. “Do you see a man who is hasty in his words? There is more hope for a fool than for him (Proverbs 29:20).” Many words, whether talking about others, or justifying oneself, or quarreling, or just constant talking, inevitably involve transgression.

 

The prudent person keeps many of his thoughts to himself. Doing so may protect his life. “Whoever guards his mouth preserves his life; he who opens wide his lips comes to ruin (Proverbs 13:3).” When a prudent person does not know something, he never pretends. “Whoever restrains his words has knowledge, and he who has a cool spirit is a man of understanding. Even a fool who keeps silent is considered wise (Proverbs 17:27-28).” Words well chosen will make you happy. “To make an apt answer is a joy to a man; and a word in season, how good it is (Proverbs 15:23)!” However, it is better to walk away from a conversation and think later, “I wish I had said such and so,” than to walk away and know, “I should have kept my mouth shut!”

 

An uncle of mine once told me how he exercised restraint. When he got angry, he would write a letter, put it in the drawer, read it a day later -- and usually threw it away. People don’t do that with Twitter, and rarely do it with Facebook. The lure of flattering “likes” yanks your finger to “post” your latest witty or angry thought before thought intervenes. Email, Twitter, Facebook, text messages, and all their cousins, are more dangerous than speech. Spew out thoughts on a keyboard, with no one present, hit “Send,” and guess what? You are a published author! You might suddenly have a million readers, with your words saved somewhere on a server to be dug up years later by an enemy. Twitter and its cousins endanger their users. They have not improved our world. In many tweets, transgression is not lacking, but whoever restrains his fingers is wise.

-- Bill Edgar

Proverbs 10:19

Atlantic Presbytery Doings:

White Lake

"Whoever is kind to the poor lends to the Lord,

and he will reward them for what they have done."

-- Proverbs 19:17

          Back in 2005, the White Lake RP Church saw a huge need in the community for a food pantry. A small committee got together and in 2006 the “SHEPHERD’S PANTRY” opened. Our church basement became the “shopping center” complete with shelving, refrigerators, and shopping carts. Government grants, as well as donations of food and funds from local organizations and individuals, benefit about 350 families per month. Besides food, household, and hygiene items, we also have food for family pets.

 

Our volunteers are church members, community members, and students seeking community service credit. They attend seminars on civil rights, nutrition, recognizing the needs of our clients, and how to pray for our clients, as we treat them with dignity and respect. The responsibility for screening clients for eligibility is ours. The volunteers who work in the food pantry develop close bonds. Their purpose is to serve and glorify Jesus Christ, as they seek to love their neighbor while distributing needed food. Our goal is to address the spiritual needs of our community while meeting their physical needs.

 

The pantry is open two days a month, but is also available 24/7 for emergencies. We have offered nutritional information and cooking demonstrations. Our County Public Health Department has sent nurses to provide health information and free flu shots. The local hospital comes with information on health programs they offer. The Red Cross gives information regarding safety issues. We are affiliated with the Healthy Bethel Committee, started by our Town of Bethel officials. Thus, our Food Pantry is well integrated with other organizations in our area promoting human well-being. During the distribution, we have a box available out- side the entrance for prayer requests. One volunteer told me that he doesn’t stop praying until the request is answered. Our prayer is that, as we see Jesus in our clients, our clients see Jesus in us. Several times a year we offer breakfast sandwiches and coffee, or hot dogs and chips on the “handout days.”

 

From humble beginnings, the Food Pantry has become widely known and with it not only our church but also Jesus whose gift of himself to us leads us to give to others. Praise God for giving us this avenue of service.

-- David Coon

White Lake Doings

Atlantic Presbytery Doings:

Broomall

          In Broomall news, Alex Edgar was ordained as a new elder for the congregation on Saturday, January 4, and Kevin DiBello and Adam Edgar were ordained as new deacons. Bill Edgar preached a sermon on the occasion, Bruce Martin and John Edgar gave advice to the new officers, and Alex Tabaka gave a charge to the congregation. Then we ate mounds of lasagna and mostly ate no more than three or four desserts apiece.

-- Bill Edgar

Broomall Doings

Thoughtful Questions I’ve Been Asked During the Past Month

1. After my daughter-in-law had finished praying with her four-year-old son before bed, he asked, "How can there be only one perfect Jesus, but there are so many sinners?"

          You are right. There was only ever one perfect person, Jesus. But Jesus is not just a man. He is also God the Son who was born as a man in Bethlehem two thousand years ago. Jesus is both God and man. He is completely a man, and he is also completely God. That’s why Jesus’ death for our sins is great enough for many, many sinners. When one man sinned – that was Adam – he made many sinners. By Jesus’ perfect obedience, he saves many sinners. Aren’t you glad he can save you?

2. Why do Christians condemn sodomy, like the Old Testament does, but allow other things the Old Testament forbids, like clothing made from different fabrics?

          I first heard this question in 1980 from an articulate leader in Philadelphia’s gay world. He was a student in a night course I was teaching at the University of Pennsylvania. The question’s usual point is that Christians are bigoted against gays, shown by their arbitrary citation of Old Testament laws against sodomy and blithe ignoring of other Mosaic commands.

 

The question has a simple answer. The New Covenant replaced Moses’ Old Covenant, abolishing rules made obsolete by Jesus: 1) Laws foreshadowing Jesus’ saving work – animal sacrifices, priests, and the temple; 2) Laws visualizing how sin separates us from God – skin disease laws, touching dead bodies, and certain foods making one unclean; 3) Laws governing Israel as a nation – landholding and inheritance laws, or who could be king; and 4) Laws that forbade mixing unlike things, such as making clothes from different fabrics or yoking an ox and a donkey together to plow. These “don’t mix” rules taught Israel not to mix with other nations. Now in Christ the “wall of separation” has come down. (Ephesians 2:14)

 

God’s New Covenant that Jesus brought continues the eternal moral law summarized in the Old Covenant’s Ten Commandments, valid for all people, in all places, for all time. The Seventh Commandment, “You shall not commit adultery,” limits human sexual expression to husband and wife. Period! Like the other commandments, it does not ask whether you want to break it or not. Thieving orientation does not justify thieving. Murdering orientation does not justify murder. Sassing orientation does not justify dishonoring parents. And same-sex desires do not justify men sexually satisfying themselves with other men, nor women with women either. That behavior turns “the natural use into that which is against nature.” (Romans 1:26-27) Therefore, God’s Word warns: “Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (I Corinthians 6:9-10) (Note: in the English Standard Version just quoted “men who practice homosexuality” translates two different Greek words, one referring to the active partner and the other to the passive one in acts of sodomy. There are no satisfactory English words to translate either of the Greek words in the passage.)

-- Bill Edgar

Thoughtful Questions

Getting to Know You:

Noah and Lydia Bailey, Cambridge RPC

Where are you from?

          We grew up 35 minutes from each other in the mid-Hudson Valley of eastern New York, halfway between Albany and New York City. Noah grew up on a farm in Ulster County and Lydia grew up next to a farm in Orange County. The beautiful Shawangunk mountains stood between us.

 

What did you believe about God growing up? What did your family teach you? Did you go to church? Where?

          We both grew up in faithful Christian homes. Noah’s family attended a Christian & Missionary Alliance Church which was drifting into reformed theology during his childhood, even to the point of teaching the Westminster Shorter Catechism. Lydia grew up in the Coldenham-Newburgh RP Church, where her father and grandfather both served on the session. Our parents taught us to fear God, love His people, and read His Word. Noah was essentially reformed baptist in theology while Lydia was Reformed Presbyterian. Guess who won!

 

How did things change through high school and beyond? How did you meet? Get together?
          When we were in 8th grade, and at different schools, Noah’s church hired as an interim pastor a recent RTS graduate who was ordained in the PCA. He introduced the Bailey family to Chapel Field Christian School in Pine Bush, NY where Lydia intended to go to high school. After God unexpectedly provided a job for Noah’s mom at the school (making the tuition affordable), we met our freshman year and became good friends. In the spring of our junior year, after some prompting from a mutual friend, Noah asked Lydia out to dinner a couple of times and then to the Junior Prom. By the third date, which was the prom, Lydia decided it was time to square the theology in this young man’s mind. She presented him with some books and her pastor’s phone number. Noah decided he should give this “RP church” a try. He began worshiping with her family every Sabbath evening. We decided to attend Geneva College and the Geneva RP Church after graduation.

 

What led you to God?
          God used our families and congregations to bring us to Himself. The ordinary means of grace faithfully applied in worship, both in the church building and in the home, awakened faith in us. We only ever remember believing in Jesus! From our earliest days, we believed He is God’s Son and our Savior.

 

What led you to visit/join RP Church?
          Lydia led Noah to visit the RP Church. He was already drifting into reformed and presbyterian thinking, being under the influence of PCA guys, but her commitment to sound doctrine was inspiring and compelling. Since they were both departing for Geneva College later that year, Noah held off joining the Coldenham congregation. In fact, it would take a very patient Bruce Backensto nine months of answering persistent questions before Noah would publicly affirm his vows of communicant membership. Growing up in the RP church, Lydia went through the communicants’ class in her teens before publicly affirming her vows just prior to graduating from high school. She later transferred her membership to First RP of Beaver Falls when we married in 2005.


How has God helped you in the last few years?

          After eight good years of life and ministry in Oklahoma, we moved to Cambridge, MA. The transition from an eight year old congregation to a 125 year old congregation has been surprisingly smooth, although not without some bumps. Both the enormous ease with which we have settled here and the great grace which has carried us through the difficulties testify to God’s goodness toward us. Until now, God has helped us (1 Samuel 7:12).

 

What are you thankful for at this point in your lives?

          We are very thankful for over 14 years of good marriage, for six healthy children growing up with godly friendships, and for a beautiful city in which to live and love. We are thankful for a fantastic fellowship of believers with whom we can grow and minister. We are thankful that God is not done with us yet.

-- Noah and Lydia Bailey

Noah & Lydia Bailey

A Little Help?

 

          Your support helps keep this publication in print and online here. The authors and editors receive the satisfaction of a job well done. But no money. If you relish what you read here and want us to keep going, send your contribution via snail-mail to A Little Strength, 901 Cypress Avenue, Elkins Park PA 19027, or click "Donate" at the top of this page.

Compassion for Prodigals... and Pharisees, Too!

Sermon Excerpt: John Edgar

Elkins Park RP Church, June 6, 2019

          The Parable of the Prodigal Son is one of Jesus’ best-known stories. Everyone loves the story of the wayward son who returns home to his father’s love. When Jesus told this parable, however, he was appealing to a hostile audience primarily through the older son, the responsible one.

 

Read this sermon. Then think how you might rename the parable to help us remember the father’s appeal to his older son not to harden his heart against his brother. Email your suggestions to Betsy Perkins at duran.perkins@gmail.com, and we will publish our favorites in a future issue.

"Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him.

And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying,

' This man receives sinners and eats with them.'" 

-- Luke 15:1-2

 

          It is more comfortable to live in a tidy mental world in which some people are good and some people are bad and in which God loves the good and God hates the bad, for then we know what to do. We are to be good and keep the Commandments, be just, and God will love us. This was the Pharisees' religion. It is many religions.

 

Jesus brings a different religion. But we better keep it straight. Jesus says God seeks the Sinner. God carries the Lost back to safety. God rejoices over everyone who repents. There is no one so lost that God cannot find him, no one so dead in sin while still alive that God cannot bring him to repentance. This is the message of God for you, but it's easy to think like the Pharisees, and to say yes, yes, God wants you, but not them. It's easy to follow the Pharisees and grumble if sinners come.

 

So the Pharisees asked – and this is one place where Jesus does not condemn them for their question. The Pharisees – they're really confused. "You seem to be a man of God, but you're hanging out with the sinners. And you don't just tolerate them coming to the edges! You go and eat with them. You look like a man of God. You sound like a man of God. You do miracles like a man of God, but you're not doing this part right. Jesus, what are you doing?" It's a genuine question for them. And if our heads aren't right, it will be a genuine question to us too.

 

So Jesus says – and I love how patiently he speaks here. He really goes all out, not only to explain, but also to persuade. He goes all out. We think he's persuading the prodigal. He's really trying to persuade the Pharisees.

 

He says, Imagine you have a hundred sheep. Now by the way, if you have a hundred sheep in that culture, you are rich enough to have a servant. So when you leave the ninety-nine, they're not defenseless. You left them with a servant. The Pharisees and scribes Jesus is talking to know that if you had a hundred sheep and one got lost, you’d leave the ninety-nine with a servant and go after the lost sheep. You should go and search for that sheep.

 

And you should keep searching until you find it. And when you find it your primary emotion should be joy. Not irritation. Not frustration. But JOY. In fact, it should be such a generous joy that you don't beat the sheep to make it walk back. You pick it up. And when you get back, you should not just think that you are tired. You should invite others to celebrate with you.

 

Now Jesus here is deliberately using a lot of Old Testament background. They chanted Psalms in synagogue. They knew that, "the Lord is my shepherd. I shall not want. He leads me beside still waters." (Psalm 23) All right, what does that make you? You're a sheep. It goes on. Psalm 100: "Indeed, we are his sheep." We sang Psalm 95 today: "We are his sheep." And at the end of Psalm 119, what is it? "I am a straying sheep. Lord, seek your servants." In fact, he's not just using Psalms. He's using Isaiah 40. The Lord will gather his sheep. He will gently lead them. He will carry them in his bosom. In fact, there's a hint of Psalm 53: "All we like sheep have gone astray." In other words, Jesus uses an Old Testament illustration that we are like sheep to God. We go astray in sin the way the sheep go astray in the field.

 

And yet we are still of value to God. The man seeking a sheep is meant to be a picture of God seeking people; God seeking sinners. Again, God is the owner of the sheep, that is, of us. And if you want to know how does God seek? God seeks by coming in human flesh in the person of Jesus Christ. He here explains not just what God does, but what he is doing. He is implicitly saying "And I am the man seeking the sheep. That is why I receive sinners and eat with them."

 

And God is still seeking today in Jesus Christ. Jesus now sits in heaven. Yes, but he has sent out his messengers to continue the work. And he sends out his Holy Spirit so that this work can be continued in power and so people can be convicted of sin. This work continues to this day.

 

Now, how is the sinner found? We know when the sheep was found when he gets picked up and carried back, but the sinner is found when the sinner repents. In terms of the moral of the story, the sinner is found when he repents. Repenting seems more active than getting picked up, and that's because we're more active than sheep. So Jesus needs to tell another parable.

 

But we see it from God's perspective here that we are his lost sheep, and with great compassion he brings us back. What is God's attitude towards you when he brings you back? Well again, this man, we're not told that he grumbled while he sought the sheep. We're not told that he rebuked and beat the sheep when he found it. We're not told that he drove it back. "Let's go, Stubby!" We're not told that he went to bed in an exhausted huff when he got back. No, he's not a picture of someone resentful over the trouble that this stupid sheep has caused him. He's a picture of Joy. He
calls together friends and neighbors. There's more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who do not need to repent. Jesus is saying to the Pharisees and scribes, "I am right to welcome sinners. I am right to eat with them. Their coming to hear me is a step on the way to their being found." Like the man in the parable he is saying, I don't exact a price from them. I don't keep them at a distance. I rejoice! This is what God does.

 

I want you to marvel at how much Jesus is extending himself to the Pharisees so that they could get it – because in some ways they had a zeal for God, but they didn't “get” God. So he's extending himself to their experience. If you have sheep – and many of them did – don't you like it when you find them?

 

He is saying, "Haven't you been in synagogue and talked about being the straying sheep and you ask God to find you." And "don't you know in Ezekiel 34, God condemns the Shepherds" – that is, the leaders of Israel. And God goes on to say, "I'm condemning you because you have not sought your sheep, but I will. I will come and seek my sheep."

 

So again, he's not just saying this what God is like. He's saying God told you he was going to do this and here I am fulfilling the prophecy. That should convince you Pharisees. I'm fulfilling the prophecies that you know.

 

He even accepts their vanity in the first place. He speaks of ninety-nine righteous ones who need no repentance. As he begins to reason with them, he doesn't challenge them on being righteous at first. At the beginning he says, "Now for starters, let me not challenge your understanding of yourselves. Let me just challenge your understanding of God. You're righteous. Sure. For the sake of argument, temporarily, you are righteous. But here's what God is like with the unrighteous. I want you to understand God." That's where he starts with them. He gently leads them. He gently leads all who think that they are actually pretty good.

 

But that's because he intends to go on to another Parable. He says, "What woman having ten silver coins if she loses one doesn't light a lamp, sweep the whole house and keep looking until she finds it. And when she finds it she doesn't just put it into a better pocket. No! She calls together neighbors and calls them to be happy with her because she's found her coin."

 

Jesus first says, "I will picture God as a well-off farmer." Now he says, "I will also picture God as a poor woman." How do we know she is poor? She has to light a lamp because her little one-room house has no windows. Poor people can't afford windows. It's harder construction to put in windows. You want a cheap house? No windows. So when this poor woman has to look for her lost coin, she has to light a lamp. She is poor. That's why the tenth coin is so important to her.

As you think about this Parable, you should not say, "How did God lose me?" because you're not a coin. You want to say, "How does God search for me?" Jesus himself is the light of the world, who shows us what is good and what is lost. The light has been lit to show and to speak to your conscience.

 

And again, the punch line of the parable is not finding the coin. The punch line is the rejoicing that follows finding the coin. You notice that? In both of these stories, the punch line is the party that follows the finding. As he appeals to the Pharisees, he says,“When I eat with sinners I do so to lead them to repentance. I do so because they have repented. They're coming to me. They are repenting. It’s a happy occasion. It's supposed to be. I should be happy. You should be happy.”

Notice again how he leads the Pharisees along, like a shepherd with sheep. Notice also how he's intensifying the picture. He began with one in a hundred. Now it’s one in ten. He implies that there may be more sinners than he said at first. He also raises the guilt of the sinners because sheep are ignorant. You don't blame a sheep too much. But a coin is stamped with the picture of the king. We are stamped with the picture of the king because we are made in the image of God. So when we go astray from God we're betraying our own created makeup. We're not living as we should. We're to think of this: we're lost in sin, and not just because we don't know things: we're more guilty than that.

Notice also in the second parable how he reduces the profile of the righteous, who don’t need to repent. He does not repeat that part. There is no speaking of the nine sinners who don't need to repent in the second parable, only the joy in heaven over the one who does repent. That point he intensifies. God rejoices over those who repent. The angels in heaven rejoice over those who repent. Jesus rejoices over the sinner who repents. He's saying this is the right way to be. His followers must rejoice over the sinner who repents.

 

But there are a couple questions left by the time you're done the first two parables. One is, "What are you? Are you a lost coin, a found coin, or a coin that never left the purse? Are you a lost sheep? Are you a found sheep, or are you a sheep that never left the field? Who are you? Where do you locate yourself in this?"

And furthermore the devil always wants to tell you a lie, either that you are just fine the way you are, or you are bad in an especially bad way. Satan may not be able to stop you from realizing that Jesus came for sinners, but he may get you to think that you're too big a sinner for Jesus. That can be a problem. Will God have me when I've been running off so long? Would he have the apostate who has left the faith?

 

Jesus said there was a man who had two sons.

 

If you've any ear for rhetoric, you know he's amping up the pressure. We're not talking about sheep or coins. Now we're talking about sons. And there are only two of them. These aren't your possessions. We're talking about your family. We're talking directly about people now.

And how do you identify? You are not to identify in this parable with the father because the father is God. You are to see yourself in one son or the other. You should be encouraged by the father. You should rejoice in the father, but you should not for a second imagine that you are the father in this parable.

 

The younger son spat in his father's face. "Dad. I want nothing to do with you except your money. I can't wait for you to die to get it. How about you give me my third now." A third because he's the younger son – older son gets double in their culture.

That is an extremely insulting thing to say, even in our culture, and it would have been ten times worse in that culture. You do not dishonor your father by telling him that you can't wait for him to die, and you want his money, and you actually think he should give it to you now. It's an outrageous request.

This is what you might expect next: "Then he got written out of the will." But Jesus is making this point: the father gave him the third of the farm. And having gotten the third of the land and the animals and perhaps the servants – however they arranged that thing – he then did something even more scandalous. He sold it all.

If you are a farmer, if you are a peasant, what is the real wealth? It's land. Some of you can think of a movie. “You ain't no kind of man if you ain't got some land.” You got to buy the fields. You don't sell them. He sold it all – because you can't take fields with you. And he wanted to get out of there.

 

He didn't just hate his father's family. He hated the whole village. He wanted to get out of there. You can't take the land with you. The animals are a pain. That's what money is for. Money is very portable. Some of us are porting it right now; in your pocket you have money. It's a beautiful invention.

 

So this son sold it all and turned it all into easily carry-able money and he left. He left. He left his parents' house. He left the village. He left the country. He went out of the country – this represents he left the faith. He went to a far country – maybe Rome. He lived among pagans and he lived like pagans and he had no intention of ever coming back 'cause he couldn't come back. He hadn't just burnt bridges. He'd blown bridges up! The whole village knew what this son had done to this father.

And once far away he lived it up. But everything is a two-edged sword. Land is tricky. If you can't move it, you also usually can't spend it too quickly. But you can sure spend your money quickly. That money goes fast. So you have here a picture of sin: sin is departing from the father. Sin is leaving God behind. Sin is wanting nothing to do with God. Sin, really, is a shameful thing when you break it down. Sin is also a spending, a spending of your God-given gifts. Sin spends recklessly without thought of tomorrow. And so the son sank to the bottom.

And then a famine came, and now everybody's desperate, and everybody's looking out for themselves, and maybe their families. But he's not with his family. He's a foreigner in a desperate country with a famine. So he's lucky to get a job feeding pigs. He's fortunate to be able to hire himself out feeding pigs and wanting to eat what the pigs are eating.

And all the friends that he had enjoyed – you know, if you're spending a lot of money, and inviting people to party with you, oh, you'll have "friends." Keep that in mind – you'll have "friends,” but when you actually need a friend, they won't be there. Bear that in mind. Once he had nothing, he found out who his friends were, and he didn't have any.

 

He's a picture here of sin. Sin is leaving the father. Sin is reckless spending. Sin is also a state of need, because when you spend God's gifts and you have no contact with God, you have nothing, for every good gift comes from your Creator.

And sin is misery. He was longing to eat the pods that the pigs ate. And you're of course not just to think of how grubby dirty pigs are. Jesus is speaking to an audience that keeps kosher. They feel much more revulsion at the uncleanness of the pigs than we do. And he's really down there because, even if he's left the faith, he still knows in the back of his mind that you're not supposed to eat or be close to pigs. And he wants to eat their food. Yes, sin puts you into a state of isolation. You'll find that your anger will cut you off from other people. The criminal in jail is cut off from society. The thief and the liar are not trusted by anyone. Sin leads you in isolation.

And sin is a form of slavery. The devil's the master and he's not nice. He doesn't pay well. He seduces in order to exploit. Sin, finally, is insanity. This guy chose this way to live? Yes! He had been the younger son of an upstanding and very generous and compassionate father. But he chose this. Sin is insanity.

The insanity part is signaled when the story turns: "when he came to himself." Yes, a turning to God is a coming to yourself; it is coming back to the image in which you are made. You realize, "Yes. God has to be part of any sane picture here. If I'm not relating to my Creator, in whose image I am made, I'm nuts. This is insane."

 

So when he came to himself, he said, “I need words.” That's in the Old Testament. "Take with you words and return to the Lord your God." (Hosea 14:2) He thought about it. He says, "I need words. Because I have torched my bridges, but I'm sure my father will at least – he will make me a servant if I ask. At least I will be a servant and I will eat. I need words." And so he did not spare himself with his words. He planned his words. "Father, I have sinned against Heaven and against you. I'm not worthy to be called your son." He had that right! "Treat me is one of the servants."

 

You know repentance takes words. You have to at least say them to God. You have to confess your sins to God and you're not to lessen them. That is excusing. You need to confess. He did have to say how bad it was. Here's the early Church Father Tertullian. "As far as you have not spared yourself and your confession to God, so far, believe me, will God spare you."

And he's just saying First John 1:9. "If we confess our sins, God is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness." And so the man acted. He got up and began walking home. He did not say, "I owe this guy more service," because you owe the devil nothing. He did not say, "Once I get my life in order, I'll start home," because you will never get your life in order as long as you are apart from God. He did not say "I'm too tired because I haven't eaten," because he wasn't going to get any more food there. He might as well get started. He began to go because you must go spiritually, with words, go to God. It's the going and the doing that makes the reconciliation possible, because God welcomes you when you repent.

 

How does God welcome you? We are pictured a father with his eyes out down the road seeing his son coming a long way off. His father ran to him. Now, he's a father with two adult sons. He's not a young guy. Have you seen an old man run? It ain't pretty. If he's been running the whole time he could do it. But if it's an old man who hasn't been running – and in that culture, no old man had been running. It's just the most undignified silly look, and if he's wearing a robe, this is even worse. And so we are given a picture of a man who's not standing on his dignity, but is just so glad to see his son that he is running in spite of the fact that this son shamed him in front of the village; in spite of the fact that this son has been an idiot and shameful and in spite of the fact that running he looks ridiculous. It is a picture of God gladly welcoming us home.

 

When the father gets to his son, the son begins with his words. And the father cuts them off. He cuts them off. He says, "Put the best robe on him." I guess he brought some guys with him. "And put a ring on his finger." That means he's a son not a servant. "And put shoes on his feet." That means he's a son and not a servant. "Because he's my son" and so as the son is confessing his sin, he never gets to the part about "count me as a servant." He does not insist on continuing his prepared speech, the part about being a servant. It is for him to receive this most unmerited, undeserved welcome.

And the punch line of the story is not even the welcoming home, but the party. "Kill the fattened calf" – that would feed thirty-five to seventy-five. "Let's party with the whole family and all the servants and a chunk of the village because my son who was lost is now found."

Now, you expect the story to end. But it doesn't stop here. And this is what makes this parable really interesting. It's already tremendous story, but it's not done yet. The story should continue, "Just so, I tell you there is joy before the angels in heaven over every repentant sinner." But Jesus gives the story a sudden new twist.

 

"Now the older son was in the field. And when he came in at the end of the day, he heard a party in his house." Now if you come home tomorrow, and there's a party in your house, what are you going to do? You know, if you trust the people in the house, you'll probably go right in, and start to enjoy yourself. But this son did not do that. This son came home to a party, and he stood at a distance and he called a servant out of the preparations to explain.

He asked, "What is going on? Why is there a party in the house?" And the servant answered very prudently with all the proper relationships. "Your brother has returned and your father has killed the fattened calf because he received him back safe and sound." There's no fault to be found with the servant’s report. This is all on point.

The older son is tired from his day work. He's emotional from his day working. He is still burned by that brother of his who had shamed the family. And he does not go in and join the party.

So the father comes out, and you're supposed to catch something there. How many times did the father come out? He comes out twice, because he has two sons and neither one of them has the same heart that the father has. He came out to welcome the young prodigal home. Now he has to go out to the older son. The older son says to his father, "What are you doing?" He doesn't even call him father. He says, "Look. Look! All this time I've been working. I've never disobeyed a commandment. You never gave me even a goat for partying with my friends. But when this son of yours who has wasted your wealth with prostitutes comes home, you kill the fattened calf for him!"

With whom did the older son want to party? With his friends! With whom did he not want to party? With his father and brother. The father answers him with great patience, because the father is God himself. He is merciful and compassionate both to prodigals and to Pharisees. He says "My son. You are always with me." He acknowledges that all the time, working there on the farm, his older son was with him. Then he reassures him. "All that is mine is yours. Have no fear. There will no be no re-division of the property. It's all yours – now. Your two-thirds is still yours. There will be no new division of the property. You have nothing to fear. You will not be cheated. But we had to." The 'fitting' is a weak translation. "It was necessary for us to rejoice and be glad for this your brother was dead and is alive; he was lost and is found." Notice how he reminds the older son that the prodigal younger son is “your brother.” “This your brother was dead and is alive; he was lost and is found.”

And then Jesus messed up his story for a second time. First, he did not continue the refrain from the first two parables about rejoicing in heaven. Now he doesn’t finish the parable! We never find out what the older brother did. The parable ends with the father speaking to the older son. The father – you know what he's going to do. He's going to go back to the party and rejoice with the son that was found. What you don't know at the end of the parable is what the older brother will do.

Why did Jesus, the master storyteller, leave us hanging? Because in this case it wasn't for him to finish. It was up to his audience, the Pharisees. They are the older brother. Will they join Jesus in welcoming sinners who repent? Remember the beginning of Luke 15: the Pharisees and scribes are grumbling because Jesus has received sinners. By not ending the story himself, Jesus makes it clear to his Pharisee audience that it’s up to them to end the story. They can say, “You are right. We should celebrate that our brother is back." Or they may say, "No. I will find somewhere else to stay tonight. I will not go in."

Yes, it's a powerful parable. The Father here seeks his self-righteous, bitter son. That is the real point of the parable in its context. Jesus draws a picture of himself seeking the self-righteous, bitter Pharisees.

 

You'll notice that some Pharisees did go in later on. It says in the book of Acts that there were many Pharisees who believed. Some priests also believed. Jesus’ appeal in this parable did not fall on universally deaf ears. Some did perceive, "Ohhh, God is in this. Jesus is the shepherd sent to seek the lost, ah! Ezekiel 34, correct? I got it."

But many others did not. They said, "Well, if this is God, I don't want God. I want my own vision of a just God who gives people what they earn. I don't want a compassionate and forgiving God." Many were like the prophet Jonah. When God had mercy on Ninevah, Jonah was angry because he had been a successful preacher. He didn't want those evil Assyrians who oppressed his people to repent. He wanted them to be destroyed. The Book of Jonah also ends with God pleading with Jonah, "Is it not good that I have not destroyed them?"

And that's where this parable ends. Isn’t it wonderful that God welcomes his prodigal son home?

What is the living God like? He is far better than we could ask or imagine. He receives you home when you return to him in humble repentance, not demanding, just coming. And we all need to repent and return. There are, in fact, no ninety-nine sheep that never left the fold. There are no coins that never got lost. They are only a variety of sons and daughters who have rebelled in one way or another, who are at some distance from God, whether openly or in their hearts. And so the call here is for all to repent, that everyone needs to repent: the prodigals and the tax collectors and the sinners and the Pharisees and the older brothers. Everyone must repent and join the party.

And the amazing thing is that the full gospel is even better than this parable. It includes what Jesus had to do to bring us back. He bore the punishment and the shame that atones for our sins and reconciles God to us.

But for today, let us remember this, that all of us by nature have a heart problem. We're not tracking with the father until we repent. And when we repent, the father is gracious and compassionate not to stand on his dignity but to receive us back with joy. He wants us to return, and he will rejoice, and we will rejoice, not only for ourselves, but for everyone whom the Lord calls home.

Sermon: Prodigal Son

Book Review:

Why Can’t We Be Friends?: Avoidance Is Not Purity

by Aimee Byrd 

Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, c 2018

          Last year the Reformed blogger Aimee Byrd published a book on coed Christian friendship that received positive reviews from many Reformed Evangelicals, including some Reformed Presbyterian pastors. The thesis of Byrd’s book is that our oversexed culture has warped our understanding of who we are as men and women in the church, short-circuiting proper coed friendships in the church. As a result, men and women avoid each other and call it “purity” (here’s looking at you, Billy Graham!) rather than develop the sort of intimate friendships that we ought to have as Christians.

 

While Byrd recognizes that there are problems in the church touching on sex and gender, she misconstrues the nature of the problem and prescribes a cure worse than the disease. She complains that the church has enshrined the Billy Graham Rule and (what she characterizes as) the sexual reductionism of the movie When Harry Met Sally: “Men and women can’t be friends because the sex part always gets in the way.”1 If the church could only grow up and get past its sex obsession, we could all enjoy coed, chaste, emotionally intimate, extramarital friendships: “In this book, I’m not only going to argue that men and women in the church should not only be friends, but actually be more than friends.”2 “Before our culture became so sexualized, plenty of Christians modeled intimate coed friendships.”3 But, based on the research of body image experts such as Roberto Olivardia,4 America’s hypersexed culture correlates strongly to the obliteration of gendered spheres of work. Plus, the sort of friendship Byrd proposes sounds a lot like a kind of “Spiritual Friendship” for straight people.5 “Spiritual friendship, among those of us who are united in Christ, is eternal and is the highest form of friendship.”6 Any sixteen-year-old can tell you where this “Spiritual Friendship” will lead, not because he’s immature, but because he hasn’t acquired the level of sophistication necessary to rationalize such nonsense.

 

Ironically, Byrd believes the problem lies in our not viewing each other holistically: “When we look at people as holistic, relational beings, we don’t reduce them to their bodies -- specifically to their genitalia and sexual urges. Our femininity and masculinity are more than that.”7 More than that, yes, but not less. She adds, “It also means that our physicality should not pose a threat to one another.”8 However, seeing holistically requires that we see man’s strength and woman’s grace both as good yet presently marred by sin. “A gracious woman gets honor, and violent men get riches.”9 Both need spiritual care, yet spiritual care will not remove the double edge of man’s strength and woman’s grace. Spiritual care does not obliterate the particularity of sex. So while Byrd intones that “Real wisdom will discern that pharisaical hard and fast rules give only faux safety and faux friendship,” in practice it is much more difficult to do without such rules. Is “women and children first” a pharisaical rule? It is precisely that codified relationship of chivalry, including its carefully guarded restrictions on coed interactions, that protects men and women holistically. Our tradition works -- to the extent that it works -- by giving men and women a normative mode of interaction in what is otherwise the dangerously volatile relationship between the sexes. We can sneer and call it “patriarchy,” or we can try to cultivate a culture that reflects the created order, in which men and women are in fact different. In this created order it is the unique and cherished role of marriage by which a man and a woman are brought together into a peaceful, shared life. Cultures that last have generally lasted in part because they are realistic about the natural volatility and asymmetry of the male-female relationship.

 

In a strange turn, Byrd then proposes a sort of gender ambiguity. She (seriously) alleges that Paul “risk[ed] his manly qualifications for leadership”10 because he compared himself to a nursing mother. Reading Byrd it is easy to forget that Paul is the same guy who chastised old women for being gossips and busybodies and who instructed that “younger widows should marry, bear children, manage their households, and give the adversary no occasion for slander.”11 Perhaps this is why Byrd’s fascination Paul never moves past metaphors to arrive at his actual instructions. For Byrd, the kingdom is a place where the lived particularities of sex and gender are left behind, not a place where men work with men12 and women work with women.13

 

Byrd’s antipathy to the particularity of the sexes blinds her to the antisexual bent of our culture. As the writer of Ecclesiastes said, “desire fails” in end stage cultures. Decadent modernity is no exception, and even pagans can see it.14 For Byrd, sexual attraction, rather than being the stuff of poetry15 or mystery16 is an embarrassing reminder of immaturity.17 The Bible begins and ends with a marriage, but for Byrd, marriage isn’t that important. When a man and a woman grow closer in their relationship, we shouldn’t conclude that marriage is the desired or normal result.18 You can almost hear Ashley Fetters at the Atlantic nodding in agreement that “Heteronormative assumptions have historically socialized us to consider men and women as romantic or sexual partners.”19 If this is the future of Reformed Evangelicalism, we are in for hard times.

-- Gabriel Wingfield

1 Aimee Byrd, Why Can’t We Be Friends (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, c2018), 35.
2 Byrd, 14.
3 Byrd, 223.
4 See Art of Manliness Podcast #520, “The Surprising Origins and Prevalence of Bigorexia and Male Body Image Issues” (25 June 2019), https://www.artofmanliness.com/articles/male- body-image/. Accessed 10/10/2019. Olivardia is also co-author of The Adonis Complex: How to Identify, Treat, and Prevent Body Obsession in Men and Boys (New York: Touchstone, c2000).

5 The Spiritual Friendship movement, led by self-identified “Gay Christian” Wesley Hill, advocates emotionally intimate, quasi-romantic, same-sex relationships that are nonetheless sexually chaste. See https://spiritualfriendship.org/. Byrd and Wesley Hill share, among other things, a reliance upon the writings of Aelred of Rievaulx.
6 Byrd, 98.
7 Byrd, 38.
8 Byrd, 38.
9 Proverbs 11:16.

10 Byrd, 43.
11 1 Tim. 5:14.
12 2 Tim. 2:2.
13 Titus 2:3-4.
14 If you need an example, see Kate Julian, “Why Are Young People Having So Little Sex?” The Atlantic, December 2018. Caveat: because of the strong adult themes in Julian’s article, I can’t recommend that everyone read it. Therefore, gentle reader, I’ve omitted the link.
15 Genesis 2:22-25.
16 Proverbs 30:18-19.
17 “When immature people have feelings for someone, they interpret them as sexual and romantic. But that is a reductive way to handle affection,” Byrd, 87.
18 “As if marriage is the only product of relational growth,” Byrd, 68.
19 Ashley Fetters, “The Widespread Suspicion of Opposite-Sex Friendships.” The Atlantic, August 21, 2019.

Review: Wingfield on Byrd

Miscellaneous Thoughts on Mexican Undocumented Immigrant Culture

 

          In my first two essays, I shared my experience with undocumented Mexican coworkers on a potato farm, focusing on religion and family. In this wrap-up, I will share my experiences with the broader culture of our visitors from south of the border.

 

My Mexican co-workers seem to all be convinced Marxists, although they would not know the school terms for their economic assumptions. They would tell me that the American family who owned the farm they worked on had become rich from their labor, so I would ask them if they shouldn’t consider returning to Mexico and working there to make their own country richer. Invariably, the answer would be short and simple: there are no jobs in Mexico. Why not? There is no money in Mexico. One quite intelligent young lady, when I asked her why America has money but not Mexico does not, actually gave it a few minutes thought - then: you stole it from Mexico!  Really?

In reality, Pennsylvania was never part of Mexico, and the farm family came from southern Germany seven generations ago as migrant Lutheran and Reformed peasants. Year after year they cleared land and built wealth, until they could eventually employ others. If prosperity came from mere physical labor, we could grow rich by repeatedly digging and then refilling a hole. I have heard that, to this day more than half of the property in Mexico is owned by only thirteen families, descendants from the Conquistadores. Feudal socialism is axiomatic, and the free markets that draw Mexicans here are blamed for rural Mexican poverty even as they bring wealth to the workers.

Some Americans have a mistaken notion that the Mexican workers are exempted from taxes by our government. This is half true. I did see many Mexican teenagers claiming six or more dependents to keep their income tax with-holdings to zero. Since they were working with stolen Social Security numbers, the Feds are not likely to notice how their youth does not square with their parental claims. 

 

One time, a muchacha [literally “girl”, though here used to mean “young woman”] in our shed came to her boss with a packet from Social Security to start getting her retirement payments. “Do you think I will get away with it?” The manager dissuaded her by warning that she will be found out if she applies. But I don’t know what really happens in cases like that. What about the legal workers whose SS numbers are stolen? Do they reach retirement age to find that somebody is already collecting their benefits?

 

When I asked another young madre [mother] why she had missed work the day before, she explained that she had to meet with her trabajadora social [social worker] to have her food stamp benefits increased now that she had a new baby. The Mexicans often made sweeping claims - complaints even - that they could not get American benefits. But I learned over time that they have plenty of help from our social workers to get assistance for their children
born here.

 

Sometimes, my Spanish friends would complain about the existence of utility bills in the United States. Where they come from, water is free; here they actually charge you for it! With time, I learned that they walk three miles to a municipal well and tote water jugs home with a pack burro. But it’s free. The most rural pueblos in Michoacan have no electric bills at all, but only because they have yet to be electrified.  

 

My amigos would lament that Puerto Ricans and African Americans are lazy. They don’t work but just take welfare. Yet when I asked if they would take welfare if they could get it, they would answer without any hesitation. Mis amigos Mexicanos see el racismo as unacceptable, especially when they face the bias. But I often heard from them nasty comments like odio los negros - I hate the blacks. In the inner city barrios where Hispanic migrants live, they see their neighbors with darker skin tones as a threat. A few do indeed look to rob them, since the Hispanics often don’t use banks; they carry cash and are a ripe target for mugging. I would often tell them that they are darker than I am - should I look down on them? Also, how do you feel about black women? ¡Ah, es diferente! Amo mucho las negras [Ah, that's different! I love black women a lot]. Racism is always wrong, and often just ridiculous. The right-wing claim that Democrats want more illegals to vote for them is questionable. I have yet to meet an undocumented Mexican who voted at all. And most of them hated President Obama.

 

Like in every human society, sports are important to most Mexicans. It will not surprise the reader that when the muchachos [literally, “boys”, though here used to mean “the guys” or “the lads”] talk about deportes [sports], they don’t mean much more than association football, which we call soccer. For the futbolistas [soccer players] and afficionados de futbol [soccer fans], football is a game played mostly by kicking the ball with one’s feet. Overweight-looking gringos knocking each other down on a gridiron so that one superstar thrower can make one forward toss doesn’t cut it. As a fan of Rugby Union myself, I don’t mind the tackles, but I share the distaste with constant stoppages of play. Humorous situations would arise when the Mexican boy would be unknowingly wearing American football swag while roundly criticizing everything about American football.

I had two opportunities to take some Mexican lads to professional soccer matches. One was to see the minor league Harrisburg City-Islanders, the other to watch the Mexican and U.S. national teams play in Philadelphia. In Harrisburg, they were impressed with the local team, which beat a NY Red Bulls second string. The standout striker was a black African immigrant, and their usual bigotry quickly gave way to admiration for his skills. Sports are often an arena for opportunity, and the first place that racism falls. We want our team to win more than we want them to look like us.

 

The international test match was held in the Philadelphia Eagles gridiron stadium. The parking lot was a noisy party of fans, more Mexican than American. I found only one cluster of disagreeable fans. There was a contingent dressed as Aztecs chanting in Spanish, they can’t deport us all! I took pictures and sent them to a couple of Mexican newspapers, but never heard back. We are rightfully concerned when our President seems to taint all undocumented migrants as dangerous criminals, but gangs of them shouting proudly that our laws are not enforceable certainly does not help.

 

Inside the stadium I witnessed more unpleasantries.  Some were just misunderstandings. American fans shouted, “Where’s Chicharito?” The Mexicans yelled back, “Stupid Americans, he’s not here today,” thinking that the gringos were expecting him. Chicharito, little sweet pea, was perhaps the most famous Mexican footballer at the time. The American fans were well aware that Manchester United refused to release him at the request of the Mexican coaching staff - very bad form in international sports. It is an honor to play for one’s country. Because of our concept of American exceptionalism, fans of traditional American sports can misunderstand this honor. American soccer fans get it.

 

In the stadium the U.S. team gives Mexico its expected win. The Mexican fans shout Vamos, la verde!  “Let’s go, Green,”  But they also shout grocerias, gross things or vulgarities. Their chants are not spontaneous, but ritualistic, and involve wishing various sexual perversions on the American players. It is frustrating to hear, especially seeing young children - Spanish-speaking kids - in the crowd. What’s a gringo to do, seated in the Mexican stands, seeing how the security people suspect the filthy language, but don’t know for sure how bad it is. I know that if I were to scream the identical things in English, I would be ejected. So I start rooting for the Americans in Spanish: Estados Unidos adelante!  Viva los Americanos … Gol! Gol! Gol!  

 

Like us, the Mexicans are susceptible to fake news and political fear mongering. The reader may recall when our media was complaining about a law in New Mexico that allowed the police to question peoples’ citizenship status. USA-based Spanish language television networks Univision and Telemundo were pushing the same narrative. My co-workers were certain that everyone in America hates them and deportation was near. So I would ask more questions. “How long have you been in the United States?” Six years was a typical answer. How many times have you interacted with any police officer? Well, none actually. “Let’s remember not to believe everything the TV tells us.”

 

I am aware of only a few occasions when my co-workers had some reason to fear. When I began working in the potato shed, there was a wooden crate on a mezzanine filled with dusty sleeping bags. Months later, I heard the backstory. There had been a homicide in the barrio [neighborhood], and the suspect was Hispanic. The streets were crawling with investigators, who didn’t care at all about deportations. They were seeking one murderer. But the fear of deportation was real enough that the company bought sleeping bags so that workers could stay in the valley for a while. Another time one of our most worldly muchachos was missing from the shed. He had been at a party that the police raided. His treasonous friends handed their illegal drugs to him and ran out the back door. In my experience, quiet workers can live here for years without legal trouble. It is those who draw attention by criminal behavior who end up deported.  

 

Sometimes the Mexicans have difficulty taking our laws seriously, as they are accustomed to corruption in their native land. Local city cops stopped a carload of boys, accompanied by underage girls and alcohol as they drove the wrong way on a one-way street. In Mexico, they would pay the officers the equivalent of twenty dollars, and be sent on their way. Not here. They were deported.

Some stories of fear are comical. One of our Mexican forklift drivers came to work bleary-eyed, having not slept much. Young men in white shirts and red ties were going door to door. He ran through back alleyways to sleep at a friend’s house in a different neighborhood. Did the “FBI men” have black rectangular plastic name-tags on their shirt pockets? “Sí, Escose [Scott], how did you know?” I don’t think he quite believed me as I explained that the men driving him to distraction were two Mormon boys on their so-called mission.  

 

The same fellow, a different time, waved me over to a side door of the shed. There was a New York State certified escort vehicle - the kind with a flashing yellow light that drives in front of and behind wide loads. It was driving back and forth on the road, probably looking for an address. “What is that?” he asked. Thinking I was being funny, I told him it was la migra, the immigration department. He was gone before I saw him move. I found him at a back door, ready to run for the mountain. He had been caught once before, and sent back to Mexico. The second time they catch you, the authorities are less generous. We should remember that people may have irrational fears, but they are real to them. I learned to be more careful with my attempts at humor.

One thing that I found refreshing about the Mexicans is that they sing – out loud and in public, while they work. Americans are too shy (uptight?) to sing in public. Part of our problem is that professional recordings intimidate us, while our hectic lives diminish us. When the chance comes, Mexicans sing and dance. The locals in our shed found this silly and embarrassing. But for me it was a chance to learn their language and share the Psalms with them. I found myself singing too.

-- Scott Rocca

Mexican Immigrants

Atlantic Presbytery Doings: Cambridge

          After years of considering and planning, we began this year to build a ramp to make our building handicap
accessible. Unfortunately, the work has not gone swiftly or smoothly. Thankfully, Jesus doubled our deacon board this last year (from one to two) as the pace of the project and its accompanying frustrations has tied up our deacons for most of the year. Nevertheless, the congregation cheerfully waits for its completion and faithfully prays to that end. Likewise, many have enjoyed the particleboard substitute ramp as a helpful foretaste of fuller accessibility! Pray with
us for its completion and that we would make good use of the ramp by increasing our ministry to those who need it. We continue our December tradition of singing carols at the doors of our neighbors up and down Antrim Street, hoping to awaken good will and interest in our church. In June, several of us attended the annual Antrim Street Block Party and our congregation supplied the tables for the celebration. We are working toward hosting a marriage seminar some Saturday early next year. Please pray with us for fruitful friendships on Antrim Street where our church building is located. Pray for good conversations and even conversions. We have also spent much of this year rejoicing in a wonderful increase in our number of baptized children. Not only did we need to add a new class to our Sabbath School as we outgrew our older three-class structure, we also welcomed four new babies and anticipate welcoming a fifth in February. Give thanks with us for a good year!

-- Noah Bailey

Cambridge Doings

A Little Announcement

          A Little Strength devoted its third issue in 2019 to Bill Cornell, former pastor of Cambridge, elder of Broomall, and frequent supply preacher at Elkins Park. Bill, of course, preached before Sermon Audio, but you can now listen to fourteen of his sermons on the Cambridge RPC website. Six are from Ecclesiastes, chapters 9-12, and the others are a sermon each from Amos, Esther, Job, Colossians (2), and a topical one on husbands and wives. Thanks to Christian Greenewald for digitizing Bill’s sermons from old tapes and to Kyle Finlay for uploading them to the Cambridge web page. http://reformedprescambridge.com/cassette-sermons/

A Little Announcement

Authors in This Issue

 

Noah and Lydia Bailey are the pastor and pastor's wife of Cambridge RPC (Boston).


Paul Brace is the pastor of Hazleton RPC.


Bill Edgar is a retired pastor of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia).


John Edgar is the pastor of Elkins Park RPC (Philadelphia).


Scott Rocca is a member of Hazleton RPC.


Gabriel Wingfield is the associate pastor of Christ Church RPC (Providence, RI).

Authors
bottom of page