top of page

Volume 6: Issue 5 | Oct 2023

The Gospel and The Body

 

All things are lawful for me. But all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. And God both raised up the Lord and will also raise us up by his power. Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot? Certainly not. Or do you not know that he who is joined to a harlot is one body with her. For the two, He says, "shall become one flesh." But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit with Him. Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? For you were bought with a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God's. – I Corinthians 6:12 - 20, NKJV

 

Sexual immorality has always been a challenge to the church of Christ. We see it in I Corinthians, chapter 6. It is a huge problem today for our nation and our nation’s churches.

 

Listen! Whenever there's a natural disaster or a national tragedy, a very predictable thing happens on the news: the death toll is tracked. Whether it's an earthquake, or a hurricane, or a pandemic, or a bombing, or a shooting, one thing you can guarantee: the news outlets will track the death toll. What about the plague of sexual immorality in our land? What is its death toll? It's not tracked on the nightly news, not at all. But it is a real death toll. How many souls are lost, as people indulge in sexual immorality?

 

Brothers and sisters, time fails to talk about what has happened in my forty years. Some of you have more decades than I to see and to observe the hellish downward spiral in our own society when it comes to sexual immorality. Pornography, fornication, adultery, homosexuality, and more, grow. As the decades progress, our society increasingly embraces each one of these expressions of sexual immorality. Each step leads to further degrees of depravity.

 

It wasn't long ago that homosexuality seemed to be a very new thing that the church had to think about and confront in American society. Now it is celebrated and embraced, while the country spirals down into transgenderism and the sexualization of children. Brothers and sisters, without the grace of God, this hellish downward spiral knows no end except utter destruction.

 

Would that none of these things had any influence on the church. But we see the presence of the varieties of sexual immorality around us in the church also. If we are honest, we feel it ourselves in our own hearts. We need the apostolic counsel that Paul brings to the church in Corinth!

 

What was happening in the church in Corinth that necessitated what Paul wrote in I Corinthians 6 that we just read? Apparently there were men in the church at Corinth who believed they could visit prostitutes. Such indulgence, they imagined, was within their rights as Christian believers.

 

Paul responds to their evil directly, but in words that are one of the most powerful places in the whole New Testament that teach about the body. What are our bodies for? What do they mean in the Christian life? What significance do they have? In his whole letter so far, Paul has been building up to this issue of sexual immorality involving our bodies. “Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you (I Corinthians 3:16)?” “Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump (5:6)?” “Do you not know that the saints will judge the world (6:2)?” “Do you not know that we shall judge angels (6:3)?” “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God (6:9)?” “Do you not know?” is Paul’s refrain to remind them – and us – of basic, fundamental things about the Gospel. In today’s passage in I Corinthians 6, Paul asks the question three times in verses 15, 16, and 19.

 

We will talk about each of these three “Do you not knows?”. Paul puts his finger on something that can happen in the church, a temporary insanity or temporary amnesia, where the desire for sin blinds us to something fundamentally true about Who We Are in Jesus Christ. Do you not know who you are? Do you not know what Christ has made you to be by his blood and his righteousness, by his Spirit, by the gospel? Gospel truths aren't just for our meditation. They are to go down into the deepest parts of our hearts and then show themselves forth in all we do and think.

 

We come to our first point, the gospel and freedom. The men going to prostitutes had a slogan they used: “All things are lawful for me (12).” After all, they could say, “Doesn’t the Gospel tell us that Christ sets us free?” Paul himself preached quite vehemently that Christ has freed us from certain aspects of the Law of Moses. These Corinthian sinners took that aspect of Gospel teaching and wrongly applied what was true of the temporary Ceremonial Law to the eternal Moral Law. And in doing that they actually lost their Christian freedom! Is our freedom a freedom to do whatever we want? May it never be! The freedom we have through the gospel is a freedom to obey. Christ does not free us in order to leave us in the filth of our former passions. Christ sets us free to take us away from them. So how does Paul respond to the slogan, “All things are lawful for me?” He replies, “but not all things are helpful.” How does that answer their slogan?

 

The goal of all Christian behavior is love, love of God and love of neighbor. The Holy Spirit works in us to remake us in the image of Christ. So for any specific thought or action, we can ask, “Does it help me love God and neighbor?” “Does it make me more like Christ?” If the answer for doing something, like going to prostitutes, is “No,” then it is not helpful and we should not do it. Can anyone argue that resorting to a prostitute helps him love God better? Or love friends in the church better? Of course not! Will spending time on this pornographic website help me love God or friend better? Of course not! Will a man pretending that he is a woman make him more like Christ? What blasphemous nonsense.

 

So here is the Bible’s first answer to “All things are lawful (so I can visit prostitutes if I want to).” The answer? “Is it helpful?” Is it helpful to transform my mind to make me more like Christ who saved me? Does it help me love God or neighbor better?

 

Second point: “All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any (second part of verse 12).” What does the world say about its sexual morality? We're being free. Our bodies are ours and we can do whatever we like with them. But that is wrong. Our bodies are not our own, they are Christ’s. If we make them slaves to passion, to dark and hellish appetites, we do the devil’s work of destroying God’s image in us. Listen to II Peter 2:19. Speaking of false teachers, Peter writes, “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are slaves of corruption; for by whom a person is overcome, by him also he is brought into bondage.”

 

Yes, we are free in Christ. Praise God. We are free from the power of sin. We are free from hell and from the terror of death. But we are to use that freedom to glorify God and to obey his commandments, not to give place to the former passions of the flesh. A person led around by his passions is under the power of the flesh and no longer acting like a free man.

 

Does it really matter what we do with our bodies? What are our bodies really? This has actually been a philosophical battle for millennia. How are we supposed to think about this very physical existence that we have as human beings? What are we supposed to think about our bodies? Idea One: The body is the tomb of the soul. That's the ancient Greek Plato. Idea Two: The human body is only a machine. That’s the early modern Frenchman Rene Descartes. Idea Three: The body is what I immediately am. I am my body. That's the Twentieth Century Frenchman Jean-Paul Sartre. Each had an idea about the human body, what it is, and what it is for, what it means, and what its purpose is.

 

Here’s the truth: What we think about the significance and purpose of our bodies will direct a whole lot of our lives because we have this physical existence. The Corinthian Christians were confused about their own bodies. Look at 6:13. “Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them.” Paul here quotes what the Corinthian Christians were saying. What is the stomach? It is an organ of the body with one purpose, to process food. The stomach is for food; food is for the stomach. Then they applied that thinking to the body and sex. Sex is just another natural appetite, as natural as eating. Hungry? Go eat. Want sex? Go pay for it, or watch it on your computer.

 

But Paul continues. The body is not for sexual immorality. What is it for? The body is for the Lord, he writes.

 

Let’s go back to Plato for a moment. He wrote a clever word play, “Soma sema.” That’s Greek for, “The body is a tomb.” We're just these eternal souls riding around, you know, our body is like a robotic suit that our souls pilot for a while. That's why pagan societies, particularly those influenced by some of these Greek tendencies, always practiced cremation. Let's burn the dead body and set its soul free to finally be rid of that awful tomb, the body.

 

Christian teaching is different. The body is for the Lord. Then Paul writes something even more amazing. He continues, “and the Lord for the body.” How could the body be a mere tomb for the soul when the eternal Son of God took human flesh and was born of the Virgin Mary?

 

Paul continues, “And God,” verse 14, “both raised up the Lord, and will also raise us up by his power.” The Lord Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God, in his work of salvation took to himself a true human body and a reasonable human soul. And so, how dare we have this low view of the body as a temporary useless thing that we can do with whatever we please. The body is for the Lord, the Lord for the body, and just as the Father raised up our Savior to life, so too he will raise us up in our bodies on the last great day.

 

Our salvation is a complete redemption. God doesn't just save souls floating around the world. He saves human beings. And the human being as created by God is both body and soul. Christians have a physical existence, a spiritual existence, one person, both body and soul for the Lord. For the Lord! What does it mean that we are united to Jesus? Does it mean that our souls are united to Jesus, but our bodies not so much? Wrong. We belong to Christ, body and soul. Even when we die our bodies are still united to Christ, awaiting the Resurrection.

 

Verse 15. “Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ?” We are united to Jesus as human beings, not as disembodied souls. Our redemption is a complete redemption. Praise God that that is the case. But brothers and sisters, it has profound implications for how we live our lives.

 

On the matter of sexual immorality and men going to prostitutes, we have seen, first, what freedom means: freedom from our passions so that we can obey God. And we have seen, second, what our bodies are for: they are for Christ who has redeemed and will redeem them. Now we come to the third point. These bodies of ours are made for eternal pleasures that come at the Resurrection. We should wake up every morning and in our fight against sin remember that the day is coming when we will be resurrected bodily. So how could we ever think about uniting our members with a prostitute, giving ourselves – our bodies that are united to Christ – to sexual immorality?

 

What did our coming Resurrection cost the Lord? “For you were bought at a price,” Paul continues. Therefore, verse 19, “You are not your own.” Here is a complete contradiction of what the world is saying today: “This is my body to do with whatever I please.” Wrong, brothers and sisters! You were bought with a price and you are not your own. Every morning, we're to think about the future and coming reality of Resurrection. Every day we are to think about the past and accomplished reality of Redemption. Every evening we can remember, finally, that the body is not a tomb at all. It is a temple. It is the temple of the Holy Spirit.

 

Paul writes another wonderful “Do you not know?” question. Verse 19: “Do you not know that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God?” The living God has taken up residence within us. By the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, having been cleansed by the blood of Christ and clothed in the righteousness of our savior, he has sent his Spirit to live within us. The church of Jesus Christ is the temple of the living God. So is the body of every believer.

 

In other words, true spirituality – “spirituality” is a horribly abused word in modern society – true spirituality is that which involves the blessedness of the Holy Spirit: who he is, what he has done, how he is working within us. That's true spirituality. And what does Paul teach us here? True spirituality honors the body! True spirituality remembers that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit and are to be treated accordingly. How could we ever think of giving the members of our body to sexual immorality? Looking forward to the Resurrection, looking back to the cross and knowing that we are temples of the Holy Spirit, how can we treat our bodies as nothing but tools for the gratification of our passions?

 

Paul, by the Spirit of God, now gives us two commands to deal with temptations to sexual immorality. Verse 18: “Flee sexual immorality.” He does not write, “Hey, you're strong enough; stick around and fight. Just stand there. You'll be strong enough to withstand the enemy's attacks.” No. “Flee,” he writes. Flee sexual immorality. A vivid portrayal of such flight is Joseph tempted by Potiphar's wife. He doesn't have an audience. No one's there to see what he does or doesn't do. But faithful to the Lord, he flees. You are to flee!

 

We are all buffeted from every angle by the depravity of the world. We all have to flee. Remember what Paul wrote earlier in chapter 6. “Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you.” These are the people who made up the church in Corinth, and some were now tempted to go back to their former ways by the false ideas that they were “free,” that sexual immorality was just like eating food, and that their bodies did not matter. However, God had set them free from what leads only to death. Paul writes, “But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.” Brothers and sisters, hear the word of the Lord to you, and do not hesitate to obey. That rising up within you of hesitation – that is of the evil one, and it is to be suppressed. Flee; flee from sexual immorality!

 

Before we move on to Paul’s second command, a brief word here to parents. The world wants your children. This has always been the case, but could it be more obvious than it now is that in our modern America they are coming after your children? That's where this drag queen story time comes from. Yes, it's a legitimate question to ask, why they want to be doing this in public at all? But an even more fundamental question I think is, why do they want the audience to be children? If you look at Disney+ and Netflix shows that are being pumped in front of our children, there is a clear trajectory taking place: it is away from God and towards sexual immorality. Parents, you are to pay attention, and to be aware and to protect your little ones and to train them up in the truth of Holy Scripture regarding the body and regarding human sexuality.

 

Flee sexual immorality. However, flee to what? We can’t just wander off aimlessly. Paul continues in verse 20, "therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God's.” We are to run toward the glorification of God in both body and spirit.

 

The world's view of Christian morality gets it all wrong, particularly on sexual matters. Christian chastity is not an outdated, boring, awful, repressive thing. We get to live in the light and in the freedom of the glory of God who has saved us. Winning the fight against lust, we gain the capacity to finally and truly love.

 

The world doesn't realize it is enslaved to lust and therefore blind to the reality of what true love even is. Only the Christian Church knows the true beauty and glory of sex, because it is the Christian alone that has the true picture of what human sexuality was created to show forth, namely the union of a redeemed humanity with the Lord Jesus Christ. The redeemed church is the bride of Christ, eternally united to her heavenly bridegroom. Marriage between a man and a woman is this beautiful picture of that union. It is a picture that must be protected. The marriage bed must be guarded from lust.

 

So, brothers and sisters, your fight against lust is a fight to truly love according to the new man. Your fight against lust is a fight to see more of Christ, to walk in his light, to enjoy that glorious union with the Lord Jesus that is yours. Living thus, you are light to the world and salt and you glorify your father who is in heaven.

Alex Tabaka

Erratum

In the June, 2023 issue (History, 6.3) of A Little Strength, we erroneously attributed to William Hendrickson the writing of History of the Church of Scotland. The actual author was William Hetherington. We regret the error.

Women Deacons?

 

I was looking through your church materials and discovered something surprising. You have women deacons. How come?

          During the Apostolic Age, God revealed his plan for church government. First, there were twelve Apostles, men who had been with Jesus and were his eyewitnesses (Mark 3:14, Acts 1:21-22). Beside the Apostles, there were prophets, like the four daughters of Philip (Acts 21:8-9) and Agabus, who foretold more than once what God was about to do (Acts 11:27-28 and 21:10-12). After the death of the Apostle John, the office of Apostle ceased. So did the office of Prophet. Long before the Apostles died, elders joined the Apostles in ruling the church (Acts 14:23; 15:2, 4, 6, 22-23). Sometimes elders are also called “overseers,” “bishops” in the KJV (Titus 1:5, 7, Acts 20:17, 28).

 

The office of deacon was also added (I Timothy 3:8-13). From the Apostolic Age until now, the Christian Church has therefore had two permanent offices, elder/overseer and deacon. When Paul wrote to the church in Philippi, he named both permanent offices in his salutation: “Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, to all the saints in Christ Jesus who are at Philippi, with the overseers and deacons (Philippians 1:1).”

 

Good. You have just given the standard Presbyterian account of church government. Where did you come up with women deacons?

          From the Bible! Paul charged the church in Rome to welcome Phoebe, a deacon coming to Rome from the church in Cenchreae (Corinth’s nearby seaport facing the Aegean Sea). “I commend to you our sister Phoebe, being deacon of the church at Cenchraea (Romans 16:1)” (Synistemi de hymin Phoeben ten adelphen hemon ousan diakonon tes ecclesias tes en Kenchreais). Paul names Phoebe as being not just “our sister,” or a “servant of Jesus Christ,” but as being deacon to the particular church in Cenchreae.

 

Why did the KJV translate “servant” rather than “deacon” in Romans 16:1?” The translation “servant” for “diakonos” is linguistically possible since that was the meaning of the word before the Christian Church adopted the word for the office of Deacon. However, that translation does not do justice to Phoebe’s being a “diakonos” of the particular church in Cenchreae. Furthermore, the 17th Century Anglican Church had only male deacons who assisted the priest in worship; so naming Phoebe a “deacon” in the KJV would have been awkward. Translations in the KJV tradition continue to translate “servant,” but often include “deacon” as an alternate translation in a footnote. Writing around 400 A.D., John Chrysostom whom Calvin regarded highly, referred to Phoebe more than once in his writings as “having the office of a deacon.”

 

Okay, Phoebe is called a deacon. Is there any other evidence in the Bible for women deacons?

         Yes. The qualifications for elders and deacons in I Timothy 3:1-13 show that women were deacons. The passage begins by requiring that an overseer must have a good reputation, only one wife, good character, and run his household well (verses 1-7). Then comes the next office, introduced by the word “likewise.” “Deacons likewise…” should be of good character (verses 8-10). Like elders they should be the husbands of one wife and manage their households and children well (v.12).

 

In the middle of the passage on deacons, Paul writes, “Women must likewise be dignified, not malicious gossips, but temperate, faithful in all things (New American Standard Bible).”

 

Why not translate “wives,” as the KJV does? Four reasons: 1) The Greek word gynaikas means women! Only when connected to a man does the word for “woman” in Greek mean “wife.” That happens in verse 12. “Let deacons be one woman men,” i.e. “Deacons should have [only] one wife.” 2) It would be odd for Paul to write about the qualifications of deacons’ wives and write nothing about elders’ wives. 3) It also makes little sense to write about deacons’ wives in verse 11 before clearly introducing deacons’ wives in verse 12. 4) Finally and almost conclusively, the “likewise” signals a new group of people: …likewise deacons (v.8), …likewise women [deacons] (v.11). In a church that already knew about both men and women deacons, it would be quite clear to write in verse 11, “women likewise” that is, “next, women [deacons].”

 

Is there evidence from later church history that the early church had women deacons?

         Yes. In a famous letter Pliny the Younger wrote to the Emperor Trajan in 112 A.D., Pliny writes charmingly, “It is my practice, my lord, to refer to you all matters concerning which I am in doubt… I have never before participated in trials of Christians, so I do not know what offenses are to be punished…. Meanwhile, in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have followed the following procedure: I interrogated them as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I executed.” Pliny dealt with frustrating anonymous false accusations, something he would not countenance. So, “I judged it all the more necessary to find out what the truth was by torturing two female slaves who were called deacons. But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. I therefore postponed the investigation and hastened to consult you.”

 

Pliny wrote in Latin, so he did not use the Greek word “deacons,” but the Latin word “ministrae.” Like the Greek “diakonos,” “ministrae” ordinarily meant “servant” in Latin, but it would be strange for Pliny first to call these women slaves – and then servants. No, the point clearly is that these women held the office of “ministrae” among the Christians whom Pliny was investigating. That is, they held the office of “deacon,” so Pliny could reasonably expect them to know what Christians believed. As slaves, they were the more suitable to torture than free men or women would have been.

 

What happened to women deacons in later history?

          There is such abundant evidence that the early Church had deaconesses that it is not necessary to cite it. No one denies it. However, as time passed the church began to borrow priestly customs from the Mosaic Law and bring Roman political hierarchy into the church. Deacons became the bottom rung in the developing church hierarchy, often a step towards becoming a priest. Then there were “sub-deacons,” who could later become deacons. Women, of course, could not be priests. The office of woman deacon died out about the time the Roman Empire ended, and the growth of nunneries more or less took their place.

 

At the Reformation, there was an effort to recover New Testament church government, including deacons, but constant religious and political strife interfered with that effort. In Scotland, from where the Presbyterian Church comes, deacons mostly disappeared during the turbulent 1600s.

 

In the English colonies in America, Presbyterian and other churches elected un-ordained “trustees” to handle church finances. As in other denominations, there was a long struggle in the Reformed Presbyterian Church just before the Civil War to reestablish the Biblical office of deacon. In 1888, the Reformed Presbyterian Church Synod went on to approve electing and ordaining suitable women as deacons to serve alongside male deacons. By then there had been widespread discussion in Protestant circles about women deacons. For example, an 1846 book The Deaconship by R.B.C. Howell, published by the American Baptist Publication Society, contained a chapter entitled “Deaconesses.” Howell cites Clemens of Alexandria (A.D. 100s), Jerome (A.D. 300s), and the Apostolic Constitutions (A.D. 300s), treating the office of deaconess. He continues, what matters is what the Bible teaches: “This infallible authority is our unerring guide (p 116).” He then discussed Phoebe and I Timothy 3, suggesting also that Euodia and Syntyche were probably deacons who labored alongside Paul, not as preachers but as deacons (Philippians 4:2-3).

 

What about deacons in non-Presbyterian churches?

          The part that deacons have in the public worship of God in Roman Catholic, Episcopal, and even Baptist churches goes beyond their Biblical role. In Presbyterian churches deacons handle charity needs, finances, and church property. They have no teaching or ruling authority.

 

Are women deacons the same as the widows that Paul later names in I Timothy?

          No. Some commentators, both ancient and modern, have tried to tie ancient church deaconesses to Paul’s discussion of widows in I Timothy 5:3-16, but that passage concerns impoverished widows, not deacons. It begins, “Honor widows who are truly widows. But if a widow has children or grandchildren, let them first learn to show godliness to their own household and to make some return to their parents, for this is pleasing in the sight of God (I Timothy 5:3-4).” It continues, “But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever (I Timothy 5:8).” The passage concludes, “If any believing woman has relatives who are widows, let her care for them. Let the church not be burdened, so that it may care for those who are truly widows (I Timothy 5:16).” Deacon Phoebe does not fit the description of the poor widows Paul writes about in I Timothy 5.

 

Can married women be deacons in the Reformed Presbyterian Church?

         Yes, since there is no reference in I Timothy 3:11 to their marriage status. It would, of course, have been out of place to write of them “ruling their own households well,” a necessary qualification for overseers (elders) and male deacons.

 

Has having women deacons produced pressure in the RP Church to let women preach?

         No. There has never been even a suggestion in the RP Synod since 1888 for women to be preachers. In the 1930s, there was a brief exploration of having women ruling elders when necessary to allow a congregation to remain organized. A Synod committee in a wholly unpersuasive report supported the idea. It got only 28 out of 102 votes. The matter ended there.

 

Some denominations began having women deacons to “keep up with the times” and not mainly because the New Testament church had deacons like Phoebe. It is not surprising that these churches went on to “keep up with the times” by having women preachers. The RP Church began having women deacons because that is what the Bible teaches. It does not have women elders, ruling or teaching, because the Bible specifically gives the office of elder to men. The RP Church has had women deacons for 135 years without going on to have women elders because it is bound by what the Bible teaches.

 

Do RP churches have to elect women deacons?

        No. They do not. To be an organized congregation, it is not necessary to have any deacons at all. All that is necessary is to have at least two ordained elders (men). In the absence of deacons, the elders handle church finances.

 

Where else can I go to read about what the RP Church teaches about women as deacons?

1. The Reformed Presbyterian and Covenanter, vol. xxvi, November 1888, No. 11, pp. 383-406. The two authors, Thomas P. Stevenson of Philadelphia and James Kennedy of New York were a committee appointed to explain Synod’s decision to permit women deacons. (Google “rpcna archives,” go to periodicals, and search from there.)

 

2. “On Women Deacons” by Dr. Christian Adjemian, a linguistics professor at the University of Ottawa before entering the Christian ministry. (Google “Cambridge Reformed Presbyterian Church website” and go to Articles.)

 

Has the Reformed Presbyterian Church ever reconsidered having women deacons?

         Yes. A Study Committee reported to the 2002 Synod in response to a 2001 paper asking that men only hold the office of deacon. After study of relevant Scripture passages, the Committee agreed unanimously that the existing teaching and practice of the RPCNA was according to the Scriptures. Synod approved their report by a voice vote. Although there were three other items at that Synod where there were written dissents, there were no written dissents about the approval of this report upholding the existing teaching and practice of the church regarding women eligible to the office of deacon (Minutes of Synod, 2002, pp. 114-122). In 2023 the RPCNA Synod again appointed a committee to examine whether women can be chosen and set aside to be deacons.

 

Have women deacons been a source of trouble or disruption in the RP Church?

         No. They have been competent and trusted stewards of the church’s money and property, both in matters of charity and handling all of the church’s financial needs. Like male deacons, female deacons have no part in church rule. Deacons and elders together do not form a “Consistory” in the Reformed Presbyterian Church as they do in the Dutch Reformed churches. The deacons have their own organization, a Board of Deacons that is subject to the oversight of the session made up of the ordained elders.

 

Have women deacons been a help to the RP Church?

        Yes!

Bill Edgar

How Do You Sing?

 

When I came in, I didn’t see a band, an organ, or even a piano. I thought maybe this was because this was a new church and you hadn’t gotten one, but I asked people how long they have been coming here, and one said two months and another said several years, so this isn’t a new church. Don’t you want music?

 

          Of course we want music. We love music. We sing a cappella.

I know that’s how a chorus sings. But churches have bands. Old-fashioned ones have organs. Many churches have choirs. But I never heard of a whole church singing a cappella.

 

          Guess what a cappella first meant. It is Italian and means “in the church style.” In the ancient world, the Jews had trumpets and stringed instruments at the Temple, and the pagans had similar music at their temples. The church sang in its own style, just with their voices.

 

Really? I never knew that. Why did they do that?

          God wants his people to sing to him, not listen to professionals make their music for them. Everyone can sing. Here is what the Bible says. “Come, let us sing to the LORD; let us shout aloud to the Rock of our Salvation (Psalm 95:1).” “…speaking to one another with psalms, hymns, and songs from the Spirit. Sing and make music from your heart to the Lord (Ephesians 5:19).” “Sing to him, sing praise to him; tell of all his wonderful acts (Psalm 105:2).” “Let the message of Christ dwell among you richly as you teach and admonish one another with all wisdom through psalms, hymns, and songs of the Spirit, singing to God with gratitude in your hearts (Colossians 3:16).” “And they sang a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders (Revelation 14:3).” “By him therefore let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise, the fruit of lips that confess his name (Hebrews 13:15).”

 

Wait a minute. I just opened my Bible to the last Psalm and it commands, “Praise him with the trumpet sound, praise him with lute and harp! Praise him with tambourines and dance; praise him with strings and pipe! Praise him with sounding cymbals; praise him with loud clashing cymbals (Psalm 150:3-5).” That’s the opposite of what you are saying!

 

          Psalm 150 describes the worship of God at the Temple in Jerusalem. Professional musicians from the tribe of Levi played the instruments as King David planned (II Chronicles 7:6). They were part of the worship of God by animal sacrifice that was central to Temple worship. Animal sacrifices were only shadows of the one real sacrifice of Jesus. Now that he has come, animal sacrifices have ended. Temple worship with musical instruments has ended. The Temple was destroyed and never rebuilt.

 

Jews in synagogue worship did not use the musical instruments used at the Temple. Most of the first Christian churches came out of Jewish synagogues and did not introduce musical instruments. So singing (music!) was a cappella. It was church style.

 

When did that change? Every church I have ever been to uses musical instruments.

 

          Organs began making their way into churches around 900 A.D. How, or why, we don’t know. It took another five hundred years for them to become fully established in Roman Catholic churches. The famous theologian Thomas Aquinas wrote in the 1200s, “The church does not make use of musical instruments, such as harps and psalteries, in the divine praises, for fear of seeming to imitate the Jews.” He and many others before 1000 resisted the use of musical instruments, calling it “Judaizing,” that is, going back to Temple ways.

 

By the time of the Reformation, however, the organ was common in the Western Church. (The Eastern Orthodox Churches continued to sing a cappella as it does to this day.) John Calvin, the French Reformer in Geneva, Switzerland, in the 1500s rejected Roman Catholic use of musical instruments. He wrote, “Musical instruments in celebrating the praises of God would be no more suitable than the burning of incense, the lighting of lamps, and the restoration of the other shadows of the law. The Papists therefore have foolishly borrowed this, as well as many other things, from the Jews. Men who are fond of outward pomp may delight in that noise; but the simplicity, which God recommends to us by the apostles is far more pleasing to him. Paul allows us to bless God in the public assembly of the saints, only in a known tongue (I Corinthians 14:16).”

 

Presbyterian churches in the 1500s went back to the ancient way of singing without musical instruments, turning to organs again only in the 1800s. So, viewed against the whole of Christian history, church music has been far more often singing without musical instruments than with them. The question should be, “Why do you have a band?” or “Why do you have an organ?” not, Why not have them.

 

Musical instruments were for the Temple. It is no more. Loud bands often drown out people singing. It is harder to sing a cappella (church style) than to listen to others; but when merely listening, the church does not offer to God the sacrifice of the fruit of its lips. We love music, in fact. That’s why we insist on making it ourselves, a joyful noise to God.

Bill Edgar

Lustful Traitors

The righteousness of the upright delivers them, but the treacherous are taken captive by their lust.

– Proverbs 11:6

 

          People used to exclaim, “Don’t be a Benedict Arnold!” And Judas Iscariot horrified Christians. But today we don't hear about those two men very much. Treachery has lost its odiousness because personal loyalty has lost its place as a high virtue. Utilitarian self-interest calculation has replaced loyalty in our calculus of personal relations. A married woman once said to me, “My husband is okay, but I can do better.” So she left him. Many cultures, however, view treachery as the most heinous of crimes. Dante put treachery in the ninth and deepest circle of hell, where people who betrayed families, cities, guests, masters, and friends suffered, like Absalom, who betrayed his father David for power, or the Greek Ephialtes, who for money showed the Persians the path to get behind the Spartans at Thermopylae.

 

What moves people to treachery? Lust, which begins with covetousness, has taken them captive. The treacherous begin by breaking the Commandment: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife…or anything that is your neighbor’s.” The “anything” includes your neighbor’s status, power, and toys, as well as house and wife (Exodus 20:17). Coveting seems harmless, occurring only in thoughts and emotions. Only God sees it. A person may not even be aware that he is coveting. But thoughts, like elections, have consequences. Festering covetousness blossoms into lust for what is not ours and takes a sinner captive. Paul would not have known what lust was had he not heard the command, “Do not covet (Romans 7:7).” Treachery lies at the door of a lusting person. He will betray anyone to get what he lusts for. Eve and Adam’s lust for forbidden fruit, and also “to be like God” led to treachery. Disloyal to God who made them, they became Satan’s friend.

 

What protects someone from monstrous treachery? The righteousness of an upright man delivers him. Upright people accept that what they possess, and do not possess, is by God’s Providence, and they are content. Jesus warned against covetousness. He told a man who wanted help with inheritance issues, “Take care, and be on your guard against all forms of covetousness, for one’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions (Luke 12:15).” Obedience to the command, “Do not covet,” delivers people from enslaving lusts that lead to treachery.

 

Sin promises freedom, but it enslaves. Righteousness frees us. Always calculating one’s best interest in every relationship quickly involves covetousness, which ripens to lust, and leads to treachery. The “son” of Proverbs needs to know: the righteousness of the upright delivers him; lust, however, can capture him and makes him treacherous.

Bill Edgar

Report on the 2023 Synod of the RPCNA

 

          The 2023 RPCNA Synod kicked off on Tuesday morning, June 20, at the now customary location of Indiana Wesleyan University in Marion, Indiana. Retiring moderator Harry Metzger preached on the centrality of Jesus' Resurrection, and urged us never to neglect it. It was his privilege to choose the speakers and the topic for the preaching services that began each day, so he chose his co-pastors in North Hills PA, Matthew Ma and Martin Blocki, and asked them also to preach the Resurrection from 1 Corinthians 15, as did Pastor Benjamin Glaser of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church.

 

Following the introduction of a sizable number of new delegates, there was a definite pause when nominations for moderator were opened. Overcoming his inherent reticence, your scribe helped the Synod avoid an uncomfortable silence by nominating Pastor Pete Smith of Covenant Fellowship near Pittsburgh. Despite not receiving the customary advance notice, Mr. Smith did a fine job all week.

 

The Synod then had to address ten communications, quite a few more than the usual number, and some of them accompanied by a lengthy paper trail. Six came from the Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery, mostly connected in some way to the unhappy end of Christ Church RPC in Brownsburg IN. These the Synod declined to consider, for a variety of reasons. Another complaint came from the Pacific Coast Presbytery in regards to ordaining a pastor who is willing to sing hymns when attending other churches. This complaint resulted in the appointment of a study committee. Another complaint involved the RP Home going to civil court to compel the paying of a bill by a retired RP pastor. The money has been paid and the lawsuit resolved, but the Synod indicated that despite the strictures of federal health information laws, in the case of RP members, at the least, the RP Home should first reach out to the member's session (see 1 Corinthians 6:1-7). A request for a more lengthy statement on abortion in the RP Testimony resulted in a new study committee, as did a lengthy paper questioning our practice of ordaining women to the office of deacon.

 

A study committee that was appointed in 2022 brought in four recommendations on the topic of abuse. After considerable debate, the ideas of having a standing advisory committee for such matters and a new paragraph in the Testimony occasioned enough unease that the paper was returned to the committee for further consideration. What did not occasion any controversy was the recommendation that every congregation have its own child protection policy. This idea has not yet passed, but as no one spoke against it, it seems likely to become denomination policy sooner or later.

 

The Synod turned with some relief to good news from the mission field. A new commission for Latin America was appointed, as we are receiving a steady stream of contacts from Central and South America. We heard about growth in South Sudan, Central Asia, and East Asia. The RP Global Mission Board wants you to know that we need more missionaries, and that they have training programs to help begin the process at home and strengthen our ministry to those who have immigrated to America.

 

The RP Global Board has decided to trim back the Short Term Mission Program to Pittsburgh, and to points abroad. Who should take the lead in seeing that there are domestic short term mission teams? The Home Mission Board suggests the presbyteries. One recent example occurred in Atlantic Presbytery when a team of young people, led by Pastor Hunter Jackson, took a weekend to assist in outreach in Salisbury MD.

 

With a heavy heart, two commissions appointed to deal with the aftermath of an abuse case at Immanuel RPC in West Lafayette IN reported on their followup with the elders and pastor. The men in question had all informed their respective commissions that they renounced the authority of the RPCNA. Though the debate was passionate, the votes to depose the former elders and excommunicate the former pastor were lopsided. Pastor Jared Olivetti was excommunicated by a vote of 99-24. Those who remain with the Immanuel congregation have withdrawn from the denomination to pursue a different course.

 

         Returning to more routine matters, the Trustees of Synod suggested that the Synod should not only refuse a request from Atlantic Presbytery to have boards disclose the salaries of employees, but even stop the long-established practice of printing pastors' salaries in the appendix of the Minutes of Synod. This idea found no traction when debated, and was soundly defeated. Synod's boards will instead now begin to report employee salaries, and they will be reported in the appendix of Synod's Minutes, behind the pastors'.

 

The denomination grew by a small amount last year, in line with recent trends, and enjoyed an increase in the number of ruling elders, a welcome break from many years of decline. We thank the Lord for hearing our prayers for more elders. May he give us many more! Next year the Canadian congregations will begin to be counted within their own new denomination, the Reformed Presbyterian Church of Canada, established May 12, 2023.

 

The RP International Conference will be held in 2024 for the first time in eight years, God willing, at Indiana Wesleyan University, from June 25-July 1. Note the early date; it is the week that was available. To accommodate an early conference, Synod 2024 will be still earlier, at Geneva College, from June 11-14.

John D. Edgar

Atlantic Presbytery Report

 

          The fall meeting of the Atlantic Presbytery was held at White Lake Camp on September 22-23, again in conjunction with a young adult retreat. This retreat was much larger than the previous year, as it involved young people in grades 7-12 not only from the Atlantic Presbytery, but also from the St Lawrence Presbytery, with campers also arriving from Washington DC, western PA, and Ottawa. Kyle and Violet Finley are to be thanked for their work as young adult coordinators in our presbytery, as are Chris and Megan Goerner who do the same job in the St Lawrence. Pastors Tabaka, Howe, and Coon each addressed the young people once.

 

Hunter Jackson preached to open the meeting, and John Edgar and Bruce Martin continued to serve as moderator and clerk. Then the key work of presbytery began, examining students and dealing with judicial matters. Ryan Alsheimer passed his exegesis paper on John 21:15-19. Nine exams down, one to go. A judicial commission reported on a trial held at Elkins Park. There was no appeal in the case, but at the joint request of two involved parties, there was a discussion of whether a session may require a member who sins habitually with drunkenness to abstain from alcohol. The ensuing discussion was inconclusive and the matter was laid aside.

 

The following morning theological student Dan Self preached powerfully on Matthew 28:16-20, stressing especially the comfort to be found in Jesus' words, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.” He passed unanimously, receiving both praise and advice for how to improve further. One exam down, nine to go. He was then examined in Personal Godliness. The intimate parts of such an exam had been conducted privately by phone in advance; he passed the public part before presbytery. Two down, eight to go.

 

The young people came in and watched as Ryan Alsheimer took his final exam in Church History. He passed. Ten down, none to go. He was licensed to receive a call to the gospel ministry.

 

Elder John Cripps then passed his English Bible exam, displaying impressive knowledge in the process. Three exams down, none to go. He was licensed for more regular preaching in Christ's church. These two exams had been chosen as most accessible for the young people, and the presbytery hopes it was edifying for them. The young people left, growing hungry as the meeting ran long in the dining hall.

 

The presbytery met earlier with Kyle and Violet Finley, and decided to have one more joint presbytery young adult retreat before doing a thorough evaluation of the pros and cons. The moderator was also tasked with appointing a committee to write a Child Protection Policy for young adult events. Michael Howarth of Christ Church in Rhode Island was introduced and received as another theological student under the care of the presbytery. The presbytery rejoiced as it adjourned, particularly because Ryan Alsheimer and John Cripps had completed their prescribed courses, and because Michael Howarth had joined Dan Self among our students under care.

John D. Edgar

Delmarva RP Church Plant Closes

 

          After a little over a year of regular Lord’s Day worship and a growing effort at outreach in Salisbury, Maryland, the Delmarva Commission agreed with the original core of four believers to close the church plant effort for the present. Two things happened close together to precipitate this decision: 1) The Commission for a variety of reasons concluded that it needed to reduce worship from weekly to twice a month and invite the group there to gather to worship via the web-streams of either the Elkins Park or Hazleton RP churches; and 2) One of the original four told the other three that she would not be continuing to participate. In the ensuing conversation they decided it was time to suspend this church planting effort.

 

During the year of worship services, the number of those attending regularly did increase, and others came on and off. However, what the core group and the Commission was praying for most, the arrival of men who might be good candidates for leadership, did not happen. A Friday Bible Study will continue. If there is an influx of more people interested in a Reformed Presbyterian church plant, the Commission, in consultation with the folks there, will reconsider the present cessation of our church planting effort there.

 

We conclude with special thanks to Linda Brace, who fed lunch nearly every week to the men driving to Salisbury to preach. Thank you also to the seven men in the preaching rotation driving the three hours there and three hours back to preach: Paul Brace, Bill Edgar, John Edgar, Hunter Jackson, Bruce Martin, Duran Perkins, and Alex Tabaka. Finally, thank you to John Edgar, who served as the Commission’s chair and went to some lengths sometimes to arrange the weekly preaching.

 

The final meeting, held on September 24, was the first Lord’s Supper held there, before which the Commission interviewed members as to their eligibility to take Communion. Bruce Martin, with the assistance of Elder Joe Rizzo from Broomall, officiated at what turned out to be the final meeting of the Delmarva RP Fellowship – at least for now. That meeting had the largest local attendance in the Fellowship’s existence.

Bill Edgar

Theological Foundations for Youth: A Reflection

 

          Many times since I returned from Pittsburgh this past summer, I have been asked, “How was TFY?” My answer has always been, “It was great,” or sometimes, “It was awesome.” Such unconditional praise is high praise indeed, especially from someone as antisocial and reading-oriented as myself. I expected to enjoy TFY; I did not expect it to be one of the best programs I would ever participate in.

 

TFY, which stands for Theological Foundations for Youth, is held at one of the three RP institutions: the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary (or RPTS) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Students who participate in the program get the chance to visit the other two institutions through the course of the first week. I do not know if the schedule changes depending on the year, but this year, we all went to the RP Home on Tuesday afternoon, the first full day of the program. Many of us walked into the Home with varying degrees of nervousness and/or shyness, glad that we would only have forty-five minutes following the tour to talk to the residents we had been assigned. Almost all of us walked out wishing we had had much longer to talk to them. Some students blessed to live in the Pittsburgh and Beaver Falls areas were already making plans to return when the program was over.

 

We visited the third RP institution, Geneva College, on Thursday of the first week. We got to hear two lectures from the president, Dr. Calvin Troup, as well as tour the campus. Lunch was held at Alexander Hall, the cafeteria, and dinner was held at a large gazebo at the center of campus. (Several of the students were startled to discover that pizza can come in a rectangular shape such as Beaver Falls’ Pizza Joe’s makes it!) After dinner, we held an Irish barn dance in one of the practice gyms down at the fieldhouse. I consider that barn dance as my second favorite part of TFY.

 

The leadership was also wonderful. Dr. David Whitla and his wife June led the first week well, with him teaching on three of the four days. His lecture on Friday about RP Church History was especially good. He also made a great emcee for the barn dance at Geneva. Several other helpful lectures from the first week were about the Regulative Principle of Worship (Barry York, president of RPTS), Issues in Counseling (Keith Evans), and Reformation/Modern Church History (Dr. John Bower stood in for Dr. Rick Gamble and did an excellent job). The counselors also did excellent jobs and were easy to access if any of us needed help with anything.

 

The second week was spent at host churches. I was sent in a group of five to the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North Hills. At first, I was a little nervous, since I had never been there – that is the idea -- and the only thing I knew about the church was that they had a ministry to Mandarin-speaking people in the area. The week turned out to be fantastic. On the first Saturday, my TFY group went white-water rafting with Pastor Martin Blocki, which was exhilarating and fun and which I hope never to do again. At one point all three of our group who had experience with this sort of thing were all in the water (I fell in too, but only after we had pulled them all into the raft and they could haul me up). During the week, we got to go door-to-door on Monday evening and Saturday morning, taking surveys on their neighbors’ interest in the Bible. We also got to plan and participate in their version of VBS, which was a biweekly Wednesday night event. The theme was Soak Night, which was exactly as wet and fun as it sounds. In addition, we did some work around the church building, pulling weeds and cleaning gutters. Both Sabbaths that occurred in the program were spent at our host churches, and one group whose church did not have an evening service joined ours the second Sabbath.

 

On Monday we returned to the seminary for our third and final week of TFY. All of us were exhausted but interestingly it felt as if week two had never happened. We all fell back in together as if we had only been out for an afternoon apart, with the only difference being that we had a week’s worth of things to tell each other.

 

The leaders for the final week were Rut and Evelyn Etheridge, both of whom also did an excellent job. In addition to teaching three other lectures, he did an apologetics workshop in which he pretended to be a liberal who identifies as Christian. We were allowed to ask him questions which he then answered as a liberal might answer them. The idea was to get a feel for the opinions and conversations we might encounter throughout our lives; the workshop was somewhat scary to me though, since the things liberals say are designed to be persuasive and tricky. At the time, I compared it to reading C. S. Lewis’s The Screwtape Letters, in which to learn the lesson being taught, one must often think about the opposite of what is said.

 

Other excellent occurrences in week three were taking worldview surveys near the University of Pittsburgh, having dinner at The Oven (a pizza place owned by Christians at which many of my fellow students worked), and hearing lectures about calling to ministry and missions, both in our communities and abroad. However, the best one in my opinion – and the part I consider my favorite of the whole program – was the talk given by Pastor Martin Blocki called Ministering to the Marginalized. He spoke about disabled people and how Christians often respond poorly to them and their caregivers by failing to understand their specific needs. What made the lecture especially poignant was the fact that he drew from his own experience with his daughter. It is difficult to describe the impact this talk had on us students. The one example I have been able to come up with falls far, far short of what we were truly feeling and thinking, but I will use it again: after the lecture ended, we had our usual snack time out in the lobby at the base of the stairs. Normally that was a time of talking and laughter, discussing snacks and the last event. Not so after Pastor Blocki spoke. That time, there was dead silence, accompanied by tears.

 

It may seem strange that my two favorite events of the program, a dance and a painful talk, should be polar opposites. Even I am not sure why this is the case, but I have a theory. The way I see my TFY experience, the big takeaway I got from those three weeks, is as if Christians farther along at different points in life were telling us what the Christian walk looks like. And as Solomon says in Ecclesiastes 3, “For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven... a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance (verses 1 and 4, ESV).” My favorite events were mourning and dancing, encompassing both aspects of the Christian life as it really is. That’s what TFY taught me: “This is the way; go and do likewise.”

 

There was one small negative from the program. The combination of high mental energy and reduced sleep made for long, exhausting days, with some people suffering from migraines and similar issues that did not go away until departure from Pittsburgh at the end of the program. But to put it in the common tongue, it was totally worth it.

Katie Bailey

Reflections of the New Camp Nurse

 

          I am writing this article on behalf of the Klussman family to share our first experience up on the hill at White Lake Covenanter Camp. I am a local elder at the White Lake RPC, but sadly have had little involvement up at camp. My wife and I have always desired to get involved, but really good excuses have always hindered us (note the sarcasm). Last year however, I received news that the camp was in need of a nurse and thought it was a pretty clear message that this was my opening to get involved up on the hill.

 

Before camp started, I struggled with feeling inadequate for the job. However, after speaking with a veteran nurse from my congregation, and a great deal of prayer, I worked through my self doubt and was excited about the opportunity to serve.

 

My wife Sharlene (Shar) describes her time on the hill as refreshing and renewing. She has many responsibilities at the home and being away helped her to get a much deserved break. She was able to connect with others in our denomination and is looking forward to nurturing those new friendships. Our children are a bit older now and less dependent on her, which allowed Shar to sit for many of the lectures during family camp. It was a beautiful thing to see how everyone welcomed our family and made our younger girls feel like they were part of the camp.

 

My wife and I were both struck by the level of maturity and kindness of the campers. It was so nice to see our young children have teens modeling Christlikeness. It was a wonderful experience to go through the rhythms of the day both reading and singing God’s Word. We are both grateful to God for blessing us with the time and necessary abilities to serve his Church in this capacity. Although exhausting, we look back fondly at our time this past summer and look forward to making many more memories there in the future.

-- Dave Klussman for The Klussmans

A Little Help?

 

The Editors do not sell individual subscriptions to A Little Strength. Our goal is to publish with as little labor and financial overhead as possible. Yet mailing paper copies to Atlantic Presbytery churches and maintaining a website aren't free. If you have found A Little Strength to be interesting and profitable,

would you consider sending a contribution?

 

Make your check out to Elkins Park RPC, designated for A Little Strength,

and send it to the treasurer, at the church's address:

 

901 Cypress Ave, Elkins Park, PA 19027.

Authors in This Issue

 

Katie Bailey is the daughter of Noah and Lydia Bailey, and a member of Cambridge RPC.

 

Bill Edgar is a retired pastor of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia) and the author of 7 Big Questions Your Life Depends On.

 

John D. Edgar, the pastor of Elkins Park RPC (Philadelphia) recently completed his Doctoral of Ministry degree at RPTS.

Dave Klussman is an elder of White Lake RPC.

 

Alex Tabaka preached the included sermon as pastor of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia). He has very recently accepted a call to Los Angeles RPC.

bottom of page