top of page

Volume 7: Issue 1 | Feb 2024

How Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament


“These are my words which I spoke to you while I was still with you,
that all things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the
Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” Then He opened their minds to
understand the Scriptures. – Luke 24:44-45


          Wouldn’t you love to hear a tape of Jesus’ talk showing how he fulfilled the Old Testament? I would. But we don’t need such a tape. We have the New Testament! The New Testament is Jesus’ interpretation of the Old Testament. In sum, his interpretation is this: “You search the Scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is these that bear witness of me.” (John 5:39) Jesus did not start a new religion. He fulfilled an old one. He said, “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill.” (Matthew 5:17)


In this article I will not list Old Testament prophecies such as “born in Bethlehem” (Micah 5:2, Matthew 2:4-6) or “buried with the rich” (Isaiah 53:9, Matthew 27:57-60) and cite their fulfillment by Jesus. Any number of study Bibles do that quite well. Instead, I plan to show how Jesus of Nazareth fulfills all of the promises made by God in his covenants with David, Israel, Abraham, and Adam.


          English-speaking Christians call the Hebrew Scriptures the “Old Testament.” A better translation of Palaia Diatheke, the name of the “Old Testament” in the original Greek, is “Old Covenant.” God made the Old, or Mosaic, Covenant with Israel at Mt. Sinai. The Old Covenant is recorded in Exodus 19-24 and more generally in Exodus to Deuteronomy. The Scriptures written in connection with the Old Covenant contain: 1) the Law, with Genesis as a Prologue to the Covenant; 2) the Prophets, Early: Joshua to II Kings, covering the history of Israel in Canaan, and Later: Isaiah to Malachi; and 3) the Writings, I Chronicles to Song of Solomon, covering Israel’s later history and its Wisdom literature. When Jesus said that all things about him written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled, he referred to the entire Hebrew Bible I have just outlined, the Psalms standing for all the Writings.


We are going to begin with the Later Prophets and generally work backward through the Old Testament. At the same time we are going to work forward through the New Testament. Jesus’ followers first understood how he fulfilled the Covenant with David, second how he fulfilled the Mosaic Covenant, and later how he fulfilled the Covenants with Abraham and Adam. We’ll begin with the Jewish longing for a Messiah, promised clearly by the Later Prophets.


After a four hundred year rule King David’s dynasty ended. Nebuchadnezzar conquered Jerusalem, destroyed the Temple, took Israel into captivity in Babylon, and left no son of David on the throne. But God had promised David in a covenant that a son of his would always sit on the throne in Jerusalem. That covenant is recorded in II Samuel 7 and celebrated in Psalms 89 and 132. With Jerusalem’s fall and the end of Judah’s independence, it appeared that God had broken his covenant.


The prophet Jeremiah witnessed Jerusalem’s fall and the crisis of faith godly Israelites felt. God’s word came to Jeremiah:

 

Thus says the Lord, “If you can break my covenant for the day, and my covenant for the night, so that day and night will not be at their appointed time, then my covenant may also be broken with David my servant that he shall not have a son to reign on his throne.” (Jeremiah 33:20-21)


But Jerusalem fell, and for six hundred years no son of David sat on the throne. Faithful Jews, however, believed Jeremiah’s word and similar prophecies by Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Micah, Zechariah, and all the prophets: that God would one day raise up a son of David to sit on his throne. They called the coming King the Anointed One, Messiah in Hebrew, Christ in Greek.


          What does the New Testament say about Jesus? It opens with this announcement: “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David.” (Matthew 1:1) It closes with these words: “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify to you these things for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright and morning star.” (Revelation 22:16) The night Jesus was born, the angel told the shepherds that he had good news for all the people: “For today in the city of David there has been born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.” (Luke 2:11) God kept his covenant promise to David and fulfilled his word through Jeremiah by sending Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah, to be Israel’s King. When Jesus asked his disciples, “But who do you say that I am?” Peter answered for them all: “You are the Christ.” (Mark 8:29) When we call Jesus of Nazareth “Jesus Christ,” we confess that he is the Messiah, the son of David, sitting on his throne in the heavenly Jerusalem.


Jesus fulfilled the prophetic promise of a Messiah, but he is much more than another David ruling Israel. He is much more in three ways. First, he is the Son of God as well as the Son of David. He is Emmanuel, as Isaiah prophesied, meaning “God with us.” (Isaiah 7:14, Matthew 1:23) “For a child will be born to us,” Isaiah wrote elsewhere. “And the government will rest on his shoulders; and his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. There will be no end to the increase of his government or of peace, on the throne of David and over his kingdom.” (Isaiah 9:6-7) Jesus himself pointed out that David in Psalm 110 speaks of Messiah’s victories and calls his Son “lord.” “If David then calls him ‘Lord,’ how is he his son?” Jesus asked. (Matthew 22:45) The Pharisees had no answer to that question: fathers do not call their sons “lord.” The answer lies in Jesus’ identity as the Son of God as well as the Son of Man.


Jesus is more than simply another David in a second way. Immediately after Peter said, “You are the Messiah,” Jesus scandalized Peter by telling his disciples that, according to the Scriptures, he would be rejected by the leaders of Israel, handed over to the Romans, crucified, and after three days he would rise again. His reign as Messiah would appear to end even before it began. What Scriptures taught such a sad fate for the Messiah?


Isaiah foretold a Servant of the Lord who would bring justice to the nations, who would be a covenant to the people, who would restore Israel’s fortunes, who in short would be the Messiah. But Isaiah continued and said that the Servant of the Lord would be pierced through for our transgressions. He would be like a lamb led to slaughter, and he would be buried with the rich. (Isaiah 42:1-9, 49:3-13, 52:13-53:12) Messiah, the Servant of the Lord, would die to take away Israel’s sin. The last Old Testament prophet, John the Baptist, taught the same thing. When he saw Jesus, he said, “Behold the lamb of God which takes away the sin of the world.” (John 1:29)


Finally, Jesus is more than just another David because after three days he rose from the dead and ascended into heaven to rule all nations. Isaiah implied a life for the Suffering Servant after he died when he wrote, “But the Lord was pleased to crush him, putting him to grief. If he would render himself as a guilt offering, he will see his offspring, he will prolong his days.” (Isaiah 53:10) David himself, Peter noted on the Day of Pentecost, prophesied Messiah’s Resurrection in Psalm 16 when he wrote, “Thou wilt not suffer Thy Holy One to undergo decay.” (Psalm 16:8-11, Acts 2:25-31) And Jesus himself said many times that he would rise on the third day. Psalm 22, whose opening lines he quoted on the cross, “My God, My God, Why have you forsaken Me” (Matthew 27:46, Psalm 22:1), ends with triumph, “I will tell Thy name to my brethren.” (Psalm 22:22-31) The resurrected Jesus fulfills the words of Psalm 110 by sitting at God’s right hand, not on earth but in heaven. (Acts 2:34, Psalm 110:1) Jesus, the Son of David, is also the Son of God, he is the Lamb of God who died for our sins, and he is the Resurrected King. He is much more than another David.


          By being the Son of David and God’s chosen Messiah to suffer for his people, rise to life, and ascend to heaven to rule, Jesus fulfills God’s covenant with David beyond Israel’s wildest dreams. Let’s look more closely now at how Jesus fulfills God’s covenant made through Moses. First, he is the fulfillment of the central feature of Israel’s God-given worship under the Mosaic Covenant, animal sacrifice. Daily, weekly, and especially at the great feasts, the priests at the temple sacrificed animals on the altar. On the Day of Atonement the high priest sprinkled blood on the mercy seat in the most holy place. Could the blood of bulls and of goats really take away sin? The writer to the Hebrews answers “No,” and shows why from the very sacrificial system of Moses. Sacrifices had to keep being offered over and over again for the same sins; hence they weren’t efficacious. What animal sacrifices did was foretell the coming perfect sacrifice, Jesus, the Savior. Jesus fulfilled all of the Temple worship. Not only is he the sacrifice, he is also the Temple. Concerning the Temple, he said, “Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it again.” (John 2:19) And he is the priest who offers the sacrifice. The writer to the Hebrews calls Jesus our perfect high priest, who entered into the holy place of heaven with his own blood to make intercession for us. (Hebrews 9)


Second, Jesus unites in himself the identity of all three mediators that God established between himself and Israel. He is the King who rules his people for God. He is the priest who brings the people before God in worship. He is the prophet who speaks for God to the people. He is the prophet like Moses, only greater. (Deuteronomy 18:18, Acts 3:22) God’s final word to the world has come through his Son, Jesus. The canon of Scripture closes with the witness of his immediate followers. Jesus, in fact, spoke as one greater than the prophets. He never said, “Thus saith the Lord,” the common introductory claim of God’s prophets. He spoke with authority as God’s own Son, a way of speaking that people marveled at. (Matthew 7:28-29) Here is a sample of how Jesus taught as he revealed the depths of the moral law. “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery;’ but I say to you, that everyone who looks on a woman to lust for her has committed adultery with her already in his heart.” (Matthew 5:27-28) Note the authoritative, “but I say to you.” No man ever spoke like Jesus.


Besides fulfilling Israel’s worship and its Mediatorial offices, Jesus fulfilled the Mosaic Covenant by bringing Israel’s calling among the nations to perfect completion. Israel was supposed to be a light to the nations, revealing the one true God to all people. Eight days after Jesus was born, Simeon took baby Jesus in his arms and, quoting Isaiah, called Jesus “A light of revelation to the Gentiles.” (Isaiah 42:6, Luke 2:32) In his last instructions before his ascension Jesus told his disciples that all authority in heaven and on earth was his. They were therefore to go teach all nations. (Matthew 28:18-20)


In predicting a Messiah the prophets and Psalmists promised a King who would fulfill God’s Covenant with David. In foretelling a Suffering Servant Messiah who would die for the sins of his people, they also promised a Messiah who would fulfill the worship and life of Israel under Moses’ Covenant. Through Jeremiah God made explicit the promise of a New Covenant to replace Moses’ Covenant.


“Behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt.”

(Jeremiah 31:32, Hebrews 8-9)


At the Last Passover, the memorial of the Old Covenant, Jesus took bread and the cup, establishing the memorial of the New Covenant, the Lord’s Supper. He said, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.” (Luke 22:20) (“New Covenant” translates the Greek “kaine diatheke,” a rendering preferred in modern English translations, except that the familiar “New Testament” is still used to name the Scriptures written in connection with the New Covenant.)


          Here is an irony of history. Jesus is both David’s heir and the fulfillment of sacrificial worship. In Jesus’ day his disciples were eager to call him King. They had to be forced to see in him the sacrifice for their sins. Today, it is sometimes the opposite. Christians are happy to have Christ be their priest and sacrifice. But they sometimes resist obeying him as King. However, he is both King and Lamb. (Revelation 5:6) If a person will not have Christ as King, he will not have him as sacrifice either. He is both.


But how does a sinner come near to God through Christ? Does he have to be circumcised according to the Law of Moses and also believe in Christ? Or does he only have to repent and believe in Christ? The early church debated and searched the Scriptures for the answer to that question. After God had sent Peter to Cornelius, the Holy Spirit guided the Apostles and elders to understand that Jesus’ fulfillment of Moses’ Covenant meant that sacrifice, the Temple worship, the sacraments of Passover and Circumcision, and the laws which separated Israel from the Gentiles, such as the dietary laws, were no longer necessary. Does a person have to do the works of the Law in order to be saved? No, they concluded. The proof that God’s plan for salvation was always that it would be by faith in Christ alone is found in his Covenant with Abraham. Abraham, the Scriptures testify, believed God and it was reckoned to him as righteousness. (Genesis 15:6, Romans 4:3, Galatians 3:6) Therefore, the just shall live by faith. (Habakkuk 2:4, Romans 1:17)


Notice that in seeing how Jesus fulfilled the prophesies about the Messiah, we have moved backward in time from the Covenant with David, to the Mosaic Covenant (which Jeremiah labels Old and which gives its name to the Old Testament Scriptures), and now to the Covenant with Abraham. At the same time we are moving forward in time with the disciples as they grew in their understanding of Jesus. First, they understood that he is the Messiah, the Son of David. Next they knew him as the Suffering Servant who died as a sacrifice for their sins. Then they understood that Jesus is the one seed of Abraham who inherits the covenant promises made to Abraham.


“How was Abraham justified?” By faith, the Bible says. God accepted Abraham by faith long before he gave the Law to Moses and even before God told Abraham to observe circumcision. He saved Abraham by faith which shows that Gentiles as well as Jews can be saved. The Mosaic Covenant did not do away with the Covenant made with Abraham; it could not nullify a promise made already. The Mosaic Covenant was a temporary application of God’s promises to Abraham until the true heir of those promises, Jesus, was born. Paul writes, “Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, ‘And to seeds,’ as referring to many, but rather to one, ‘And to your seed,’ that is Christ.” (Galatians 3:16) Isaac, whom Abraham almost sacrificed at God’s command, was only an illustration, a type, of Christ. But Christ was really sacrificed. Jesus therefore is the recipient of the great promises made to Abraham: that his offspring would be as many as the stars in the sky (Israel under the Old Covenant, the church today), that he would inherit a land (Canaan, and now all the world), and that in him all the nations of the earth would be blessed (by Israel’s witness to its neighbors, now by the Church’s worldwide testimony.) (Genesis 12:1-3) The nations are blessed by being saved through faith in Christ, just as Abraham was saved by faith alone. (Galatians 3:6-8) When a person believes in Christ, he is united to him by faith and becomes one of Abraham’s offspring. Paul writes, “Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham.” (Galatians 3:7) Jesus fulfills the Covenant with Abraham because he is the one seed of Abraham. He inherits the promise of being a blessing to all nations of the earth when he grants salvation to all who trust in him apart from works of the Law.


There is a covenant even more ancient than the Covenants made with David, with Israel through Moses, or with Abraham, the father of the faithful. It is God’s Covenant with Adam and his descendants which God renewed with Noah after the Flood. By this Covenant God promised dominion over the earth to mankind and life everlasting in return for obedience. But Adam failed and was expelled from paradise. Since then everyone has died. Before expelling Adam from the Garden, God said, “For you are dust, and to dust you shall return.” (Genesis 3:19) But God also left Adam and Eve with hope. To the serpent God said, “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise you on the head, and you shall bruise him on the heel.” (Genesis 3:15) God would not allow friendship between man and Satan to last.


Jesus fulfills God’s Covenant with Adam by perfectly obeying the Law. He never sinned. He was at war with Satan, resisting his temptations and casting out demons. Where the first Adam failed, Jesus succeeded. He is the Second Adam, the beginning of a new human race. Paul writes: “For as through one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of One the many will be made righteous.” (Romans 5:19; see I Corinthians 15:45)


Because of Adam’s sin the whole human race has been exiled from God’s presence. At best in this life we see only dimly in a mirror. (I Corinthians 13:12) We cannot yet eat from the Tree of Life. But in Christ the Second Adam all is renewed. He has conquered death, and when he comes we will be raised and become perfect as he is perfect. John writes concerning the end of our exile from God’s Presence:


“And he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, in the middle of its street. And on either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. And there shall no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and His bond servants shall see Him; and they shall see His face, and His name shall be on their foreheads.”

(Revelation 22:1-4)


Adam lost Paradise. Jesus regains Paradise.


          Who is Jesus? How does he fulfill the Old Testament? He is the Messiah, the Son of David. He is the Lamb of God, who fulfills Israel’s worship by sacrifice. He is the Seed of Abraham in whom all nations of the earth are blessed. He is the Second Adam from whom the human race takes a new beginning.


“If any man is in Christ, he is a new creature.” (II Corinthians 5:17) Jesus is the conqueror of death who has reconciled us to God and will bring us home to Him. As he said, “In my Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you to myself; that where I am, there you may be also.” (John 14:2-3) No wonder the Bible ends with the words, “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.” (Revelation 22:20)


The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen.

– Bill Edgar

Atlantic Presbytery 1982 - 2022

Minutes of Synod 1983, 1993, 2003, 2013, 2023

          What has the Lord done in our Presbytery in the last four decades? He has increased the number of our congregations by 50%, total membership by 35%, with the number of baptized members increasing by 92%. Average Lord’s Day worship in our churches has grown by 76%.

 

The number of officers has fallen behind congregational growth. The number of ruling elders has dropped from 24 in 6 congregations to 22 in 9 congregations. The deacons’ numbers have increased from 24 in 6 congregations to 26 in 9 congregations. As I write, two of our nine congregations are looking for a pastor, Coldenham-Newburgh and Broomall.

 

One pastor has been in office from before 1982 until the present, David Coon in White Lake. The majority of our present pastors grew up within the bounds of our Presbytery: Noah Bailey, Paul Brace, Bill Chellis, John Edgar, and Hunter Jackson, but only one grew up in a congregation in our Presbytery, John Edgar in Broomall. Many pastors have worked long-term in second jobs: David Coon and Bill Edgar teaching public school, Bill Chellis as a lawyer and mayor, and Paul Brace running his family business growing and selling shrubs and flowers. Two other men had what amount to other jobs, Zack Kail as Broomall’s Associate Pastor and later Alex Tabaka as Broomall’s Pastor, both working on Ph.D. degrees at Westminster Seminary.

 

Over the years three congregations have been a vital help to ones close by: in the late 1970s Coldenham-Newburgh to White Lake with leadership and money; Broomall to Elkins Park with money, leadership, and members at the turn of the century; and Cambridge to Providence with members and leadership in the first decade of the 21st Century. Both White Lake and Elkins Park were disorganized and then reorganized.

 

The statistics below do not show it, but White Lake Camp, which had shrunk to a small weeklong gathering by 1980, revived: more campers, an expanded program, and considerable building. Mike Tabon from White Lake and later Peter Robson from Rochester in St. Lawrence Presbytery along with Bob Allmond from Elkins Park played leading parts in this revival.

 

No one congregation has consistently been the largest during these forty years, nor has any one been consistently the smallest. Or course, all have been small by the oft-used standard of membership less than 150 being “small.” But thanks be to God, we have a little strength and rejoice in it. Small Walton is now overseeing a new work in nearby Oneonta, from where new candidates for the ministry are coming. Broomall earlier saw five men in short order enter the pastorate just before 2000.

 

Five of our nine congregations own a parsonage. Ridgefield Park, White Lake, Hazleton, and Providence do not. All own their own building now that Providence has been able to buy their own place. Hazleton keeps looking for a new building but can’t find a suitable one. Elkins Park may perhaps soon outgrow its present location. Broomall expanded its space shortly before 2000. Cambridge keeps renovating and renovating and renovating.

 

          The Presbytery has presented several papers to the Synod in the last decade, one concerning teaching about divorce at RPTS, a second asking for Board Minutes to be reviewed in the same way as Presbytery Minutes are reviewed, and a third about reporting the salaries of “Synod’s Servants.” After considerable time and attention, Synod adopted the substance of these three Atlantic Presbytery papers. A fourth paper still awaiting final disposal deals with how Synod handles appeals against a Presbytery’s decision: it asks that a Presbytery appealed against have no vote on the outcome of that appeal.

 

In 1982 there were no retired pastors on the roll of Presbytery. Now the Atlantic Presbytery has three retired pastors, Charles Leach in Coldenham-Newburgh, J. Bruce Martin in Elkins Park, and Bill Edgar in Broomall. None of these men is getting old; each has arrived at that destination. But they are still helping in their congregations and in the Presbytery as God grants them strength, their wives with them. We miss our fellow ministers who have died during these years, Harold Harrington, Bill Cornell, and Christian Adjemian.

 

Finally, in the last six years folk from Broomall and Elkins Park have put out a mostly six-times-a-year Presbytery periodical, A Little Strength, which you are now reading.

 

In the chart below, the two numbers in parenthesis in columns three and four are for first, total membership, and second, average weekly morning worship.

As you have read this short account of four decades in our Presbytery, why don’t you stop and thank the living and gracious God for all that he has done for us and through us. Amen!

Bill Edgar

Which Clouds?

 

          In what is commonly called the Olivet Discourse – as recorded in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 – Jesus answers questions asked him by his disciples; questions which were triggered by his prophecy that the temple was to be so completely destroyed “that there will not be left…one stone upon another” (Matt. 24:2; Mark 13:2; Luke 21:6).

 

The majority content of his discourse describes intense tribulation including wars, famine, earthquakes, persecution, apostasy, genocide, antichrists, and universal upheaval. (Following this description Jesus referred to the budding of a fig tree, pointing to the advent of summer as a parable which parallels the unfolding of the events preceding the advent of a new era.) The latter portion of his discourse includes two statements which form an apparent paradox. First, he said, “Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory” (Matt. 24:30; cf. Mark 13:26; Luke 21:27), and second, “Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all of these things take place” (Matt. 24:34; Mark 13:30; Luke 21:32).

 

The relationship between “they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven,” and “this generation will not pass away until all these things take place” (vs. 34) causes great difficulty to serious readers of Scripture. Because the ‘clouds of heaven’ is commonly understood as the clouds we see in the sky, and ‘the Son of Man coming’ as the second advent of Jesus Christ, attempts are often made to understand and explain ‘this generation’ in ways other than its common meaning. To understand ‘clouds of heaven’ as those we see overhead appears natural in light of Luke’s account of our Lord’s ascension: “[H]e was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight. And while they were gazing into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them in white robes, and said, ‘Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way…’” (Acts 1:9b-11). If this is the case, then it leaves us asking whether the new era pictured in the budding fig tree will be ushered in by the second advent of Christ, or if it has been inaugurated by another great event! The key to understanding the two passages mentioned above may be found not in seeking a new meaning for ‘this generation,’ but rather by revisiting the meaning of ‘the clouds of heaven.’

 

Later in his gospel Matthew records a conversation between Jesus and Caiaphas, the high priest, wherein Jesus answered Caiaphas’s question concerning his identity: Jesus said, “But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven” (26:64). This phrase is very similar to that spoken by Jesus to his disciples. In response, Caiaphas tore his robes and accused Jesus of blasphemy. Why did Caiaphas respond this way? It is unlikely he thought Jesus was referring to a return to earth at the end of time. In Daniel chapter seven, the prophet wrote, “As I looked, thrones were placed, and the Ancient of Days took his seat…and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man…and to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples…should serve him” (vss. 9a, 13a, 14a). The accusation of blasphemy declared by the chief priests and scribes was in response to Jesus identifying himself as that Son of Man to whom Daniel refers, who was presented to the Father “with the clouds of heaven.” The parallel passage in Luke 22 reports that Jesus responded to the chief priests and scribes by saying, “But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God” (vs. 69), apparently drawing upon the prophecy of King David in Psalm 110:1, “[Yahweh] says to my Lord: ‘Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.’”

 

If the ascension and enthronement of Christ is the event properly associated with his ‘coming on the clouds’ – as was the understanding of the Jewish religious leaders, then many implications follow. First, the work of Jesus during his first advent is highlighted as the pivotal event in history; centered upon the fruition of the Old Covenant and establishment of the New in its many glorious facets; including Messiah, “[bearing] our griefs” (Isa. 53:4), “[forgiving our] iniquity” (Jer. 31:34), and “[putting] an end to sacrifice” (Dan. 9:27). Second, the nearly 2,000 years since the ascension of Jesus Christ have been his reign as King over all, not a time of waiting for his kingdom in the future; therefore the throwing down of Satan (Luke 10:18) so that he can no longer deceive the nations, the commission of his people to “make disciples of all nations” (Matt. 28:19), and the going-forth of the four horseman (Rev. 6:1-8) as a force of testing and judgment, occur at the command of heaven’s new King; to whom the Father said, “Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage, and the ends of earth your possession” (Ps. 2:8). Third, the return of the Christ – an event to which Jesus himself describes as parabolic to a thief or master entering the house at an unknown time (Matt. 24:36ff; Mark 13:32ff) – is the event to which Paul refers when he wrote, “Then comes the end, when [Jesus] delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (I Cor. 15:24, 25).

 

While tempting Jesus, Satan suggested that he turn stone into bread, cast himself from the temple, and bow in worship to receive the kingdoms of the world (Matt. 4:1-11; Mark 1:12, 13; Luke 4:1-13). The irony of Satan’s temptation comes into focus from this perspective, for within a few years of that offer, Jesus was given the kingdoms of the world as his possession – ruling them with a rod of iron (Ps. 2:9), and the dragon was cast down to earth in defeat (Rev. 12:7-9). In his very resistance to the bait of Satan, our Lord procured the very rule which that ancient serpent offered but had no authority to give.

 

Therefore, if the clouds to which Jesus referred are the clouds of heaven with which he was presented to the Father, and his ascension marked the beginning of his reign, then indeed the generation to whom he spoke did not pass away until those things took place; the tribulation to which Jesus referred accompanied that universal transition from Old Covenant to New; the great dragon, who is called the devil and Satan – the deceiver of the whole world – has been thrown down (Luke 10:18; Rev. 12:9); and this is the sanctified age of Messianic rule during which people “from every tribe and language and people and nation” (Rev. 5:9), who have been “clothed with power from on high” (Luke 24:49), “have come to mount Zion and to the city of the living God” (Heb. 12:22).

– Keegan O'Bannon

Christ the Head of the Church: A Psalm Sing

Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” – Luke 24:44

 

          The Psalms are all about Jesus Christ, and Christ is the Head of the Church. So when you read, pray, and sing the Psalms you learn about the Head and the Body, which is the Church. If the Head is exalted so is the Body; if the Head has enemies so does the Body. Tonight’s Psalm selections give us descriptions of the Church. (All Psalm selections refer to The Book of Psalms for Worship, Crown & Covenant 2009.)

 

1. Psalm 27B – The Church is Exalted

My head shall higher be

Than all my foes around;

I’ll in the LORD’s tent sacrifice,

And sing with joyful sound.

 

By his resurrection and ascension, Christ has been exalted above all his and our enemies. The Church is seated with Christ in his heavenly reign and we respond with worship in his house.

Let us sing Psalm 27B.

 

2. Psalm 45C – The Church is a Queen

If the Church is reigning along with Jesus Christ, one could ask: reigning as what? Co-king? Vice-ruler? Psalm 45 shows the Church as a bride at the right side of Christ the groom. The queen raises up sons that cause the LORD’s name to be remembered in every age.

Let us sing Psalm 45C.

 

3. Psalm 63A – In The World But Not Of The World

In Psalm 63 the Psalmist, like the Church, is in a dry and weary land with no water. The thirst that the Church has can only be satisfied by the waters God provides.

Let us sing Psalm 63A.

 

4. Psalm 129 – The Church Is Persecuted

They plowed my back like farmers plowing furrows.

 

Jesus, our head, had his back beaten under Pontius Pilate. The apostles were beaten by rulers and the Sanhedrin. Today the body of Christ receives beatings from rulers and mobs. The cry of the Church is that All those who bear toward Zion bitter hate would shrivel up like grass on the hilltops.

Let us sing Psalm 129.

5. & 6. Psalm 15A & 125 – The Church is Unshaken

Psalm 15 shows us that only the Lord Jesus has a right to reside in the Lord’s tent. Christ remains unmoved. As I said earlier, our union to Jesus Christ as our head means the Body, the Church is unshaken as well. Because our Head is unmoved the Church is secure. So we will sing about our Head first (15A) and then the Body (125).

Let us sing Psalm 15A.

Let us sing Psalm 125.

 

7. Psalm 87A – The Church is Worldwide

Approximately 2.38 billion people practice some form of Christianity globally. This means that about one-third of the world’s total population is Christian. This makes sense. Since the Lord Jesus reigns over the entire world, his body is made up of people from every tribe, nation, and language.

Let us sing Psalm 87A.

 

8. & 9. Psalm 84B &122B – The Church is Privileged

Is there any significance to the saints gathering for worship? Psalm 84 says there is no greater place to be than in the Lord’s presence in worship. The pilgrims who are called out of this world into the Lord’s house are blessed beyond measure.

Let us sing Psalm 84B.

Let us sing Psalm 122B.

 

10. Psalm 96D – The Church Is Waiting

The Church is waiting for Jesus Christ to return and complete his kingdom, to fully and completely establish his kingdom.

 

They’ll sing before the LORD,

For He is drawing near

To be the judge of all the earth;

He surely will appear.

Then He will rule the world

In perfect righteousness,

And govern all the nations in

His truth and faithfulness.

Let us sing Psalm 96D.

Hunter Jackson

Preacher! The Children are Listening…

About Sky Color, Sinful Thoughts, Are We Jews?

 

1) Why was Jesus talking about the color of the sky in Matthew 16:1-4?

          Jesus talked about the sky in order to rebuke the Jewish leaders (Pharisees and Sadducees). They hated Jesus and wanted to trap him into doing something that would get him in trouble. “Do a miracle for us,” they said. Instead of obliging them with a miracle right then and there, Jesus began talking about signs of the weather. “You are good at reading these signs of the sky, but you really stink at understanding the signs of the times. You are wicked and discontent, asking for yet another sign beyond what God has already given you. The only sign you will get is one you have already been given – the sign of the prophet Jonah.”

What was the sign of the prophet Jonah? Well, Jonah the prophet was swallowed by a fish and was buried in its belly for three days and three nights. Jesus would also be dead and buried for three days and three nights. Then the fish spat out Jonah into the land of the living, as Jesus would also be resurrected from the grave. Jonah’s situation was a sign that God had already given to the Jewish people to point them to understand what would happen to Jesus. All they had to do was read what was written in the Law and the Prophets in order to know that Jesus was the Messiah (Luke 16:29). They didn’t need Jesus to perform extra signs for them. The signs should have been obvious to the scribes and Pharisees, just like the colors of the sky are obvious signals of the coming weather.

 

2) If I think something sinful about a person should I tell him, or ask God for forgiveness, or both?

          Usually there is no good to be gained by telling another person something you thought about him or her if it is sinful. Simply confessing might ease your guilty conscience if you feel bad about what you thought, but it is unlikely to help the other person and might well harm your relationship. The right thing to do is tell God, ask him for forgiveness, and stop thinking that bad thing about the other person.

 

If you acted on your thought in some way, perhaps by sharing something about the other person with someone else that then caused the person harm or a bad reputation, then you might have to repair that damage by telling the person you wronged and asking for forgiveness. But simply thinking a thing doesn’t require you to tell them about it. After you ask God for forgiveness, also ask him to help you change your mind when you think something unkind or sinful about another person.

 

3) If God knew we would sin, why did he put the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden?

          You are right that Adam and Eve sinning did not catch God by surprise. God both knows all things and has planned and ordained everything that happens. But God’s plans are beyond ours (Rom 11:34). While Adam and Eve’s sin and the corruption of the beautiful world grieved God, he delighted in the opportunity to show us the depths of his love by sending his only begotten son, Jesus Christ, to live in the world of sin and then die on the cross to redeem his chosen people (John 3:16).

 

4) We (Christians) worship the true God, so we’re Jews, right?

          No, being Christians doesn’t also make us Jews. Generally Jews are people who are descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob – originally God’s chosen nation of Israel. God also allowed Gentiles (non-Jews) to join the nation of Israel and become part of his chosen people, as Rahab and Ruth did. Today people still convert to Judaism and become Jews, even if they are not descended from Abraham.

 

Once the Jewish nation rejected Jesus as their Messiah, God opened the way of salvation to all peoples, both Jew and Gentile. Followers of God no longer have to become Jews. A council of the early church in the New Testament (Acts 15) decided that Gentiles don't have to become Jews in order to follow Jesus. So while some Christians are also Jews, many are not, and while some Jews are Christians, many are not. God does tell Christians that we are spiritual descendants of Abraham and heirs with him of the promises of God (Galatians 3:7 & 29).

Susan Edgar

Slack Hands Aren't Good Enough for God

He who has a slack hand becomes poor, but the hand of the diligent makes rich.

– Proverbs 10:4

 

          The percentage of American men aged 30-50 not working increased from 5% in 1960 to 15% in 2010. How do they survive? Mostly, mothers, wives, and girlfriends support them, along with some Social Security disability checks. What do they do? They watch TV, sleep, hang out, do a little househusband and under the table work, blame others for their condition, consume porn, and play video games. The idle poor far outnumber the idle rich.

 

This proverb, however, is not about having no job, nor is it about other reasons for poverty, such as oppression, war, illness, natural disasters, and even Satan’s permitted malice (see the Book of Job). It is about how one does a job, with a “slack hand,” or with diligence.

 

A “slack hand” person works carelessly, sloppily, and, yes, a little deceitfully. Rather than striving to do excellent work, he regularly says, “Eh, it's good enough.” The “good enough” worker lies to himself that all will be fine, but like the person with no job, he too is headed toward poverty. A house painter paints windows shut on a job, and then can’t figure out why business opportunities disappear. The office worker shaves minutes off the start and end of her day and wonders why no promotion comes her way “after years of faithful service.” The contractor chats with the homeowner for 45 minutes, 15 minutes with the guy at Home Depot, stops for coffee and donuts on his way to work, and then can’t understand why jobs always take longer than he expects. People who work with a “slack hand” usually choose to be culpably ignorant about why they do not “get ahead.” This proverb tells them to look honestly at the quality of their work.

 

What does the hand of the diligent accomplish? It makes rich. Diligence does not mean being a workaholic, finding meaning only in one’s work. It means doing work promptly and well, reliably, completely, and honestly. For the diligent, the word “excellence” is not a buzzword without content. Excellence is the passion of the diligent, and “do it right” is his slogan rather than “good enough.” Diligence does not always produce wealth, but it usually supplies our needs, with something left over for others (Ephesians 4:28). In a world distorted by sin, and cursed with weeds that complicate work, the diligent still tend towards wealth, while careless slack-handed workers tend towards poverty. That general law is God’s “feedback loop” to push people towards work in his world, to “subdue it (Genesis 1:28),” even as they care for the earth and replenish it with children.

– Bill Edgar

 

The Second Commandment:

Don't Try To See God Now

You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the LORD your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.

– Exodus 20:4-6

          You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments. – Exodus 20:4-6

 

The Second Commandment is puzzling. Most religions highlight the images of their gods. Why does the God of Israel absolutely forbid this powerful human desire to see the deity?

 

The Ten Commandments show you how to live with the Lord who has saved you. First, introduce no other god into the picture. Second, do not try to gain the upper hand on God, or redirect your worship away from him, by bowing down to images, no matter what they portray. Do not try to control God by bringing him into your range of sight.

 

When you can see something, you are tempted to try to master it. When Eve saw the fruit, when Achan saw the cloak, when David saw the woman bathing, then things went downhill. Each reached out a hand and took possession of what was seen. We see, we evaluate, and we are tempted to possess.

 

          One way we know God is beyond us is that he is invisible. We understand instinctively that he sees us, but we cannot see him. He is God, and we are at best his people. Our inability to see him accurately marks us as the weaker, dependent party. But being physical beings who constantly use our vision, we greatly prefer to see. So humans in all ages have been tempted to make pictures of their gods, and to justify their behavior by appealing to their feelings ('I feel closer to God when I see him') or to the feelings of others ('in our postmodern age people prefer images').

 

That close feeling is the result of impiously pulling God out of his majestic invisibility and into the range of our sight. Once we can see him, we can begin to size him up. Worse, it is not God that we see, but only our own inanimate creations, which we impudently claim are adequate guides to the real Thing. We do, in fact, have control over our own artwork, both in the creating and in the handling. Since we tell ourselves the artwork represents God, our actual control over the art bleeds over mentally into an imagined control over God. We feel closer, because it is no longer Almighty God with whom we are dealing, but something earthly, something visible, something mastered.

 

God looks on in wrath as people bow before or kiss man-made objects like icons. How can his own people pretend a statue saved them? Such impiety makes him angry with a jealousy that may last a hundred years if we do not repent.

 

That is not forever, however. His mercy lasts thousands. His mercy is for all those who love him and remember who is who. He is God, who dwells in unapproachable light (1 Tim 6:16). We are flesh and blood, and we must walk by faith. We cry out to God in the day of trouble, and then, if his answer tarries, we must wait. We are not to seek some means of control. We are to be still, know that he is God, and wait patiently for him.

-- John D. Edgar

Book Review

Worship, Feasting, Rest, Mercy:

The Christian Sabbath

by Daniel E. Howe

Grassmarket Press, 2023

Too many Christians think of the Sabbath as a day of restrictive Pharisaic rules that Jesus did away with. Thank God we don’t have to worry about Sabbath rules any more! Howe argues that such thinking could not be more wrong. Writing like the pastor he is, referring often to his own experiences and sometimes writing in colloquial spoken English (children are “kids” and people who are criticized “take flak”), Howe portrays the weekly Sabbath as central to living the good life.

 

Americans work too much! Americans find their identity in their work! American life is a blur of an unending stream of screen news, pictures, enticements, and worry. We desperately need a day off, and God gives us one. It is right there in his Ten Commandments: work six days and rest one. And, no, Jesus did NOT repeal one of God’s Ten Commandments, even though his followers keep the Sabbath on the first day of the week rather than the seventh. Instead, Jesus showed us how to “remember” the Sabbath Day.

 

Yes, Americans will ask, but what are we to DO on that first day of the week if we don’t work, watch TV, scroll through social media, or eat out? As the title of Howe’s book indicates, the Christian Sabbath gives us a day to Worship, time to Feast, time to Rest, and time to show Mercy to others. The Commandment itself puts Rest front and center, especially the Rest that we give to others: “…nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thine ox, nor thine ass, nor any of thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates.” That is how God put it to Israel: remember that you were once seven-day-a-week slaves in Egypt, so now you should give rest to yourself and those who work for you (Deuteronomy 5:12-15). Made in God’s image, we live best when we imitate him, working six days and resting the seventh (Exodus 20:8-11). Howe makes the point more than once that resting for our children means that 1) They do not have to do schoolwork on the Lord’s Day, and 2) They should be free from the demands of ambitious coaches and parents to play their future athletic scholarship sport on that day.

 

But resting from our labors and giving others rest from their labors, what do we DO? Howe develops three themes here: we WORSHIP God who made and redeemed us by being physically present with his church each week to hear his Word, pray to him, sing his praise, and talk with fellow believers; we lift burdens from the backs of others by showing them the MERCY that they need, like Jesus did when he healed people on the Sabbath; and we FEAST. People familiar with the Westminster Standards and their teaching about the Christian Sabbath will recognize the place of worship and mercy on that day, but feasting? The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Westminster Catechisms and the Westminster Directory for Public Worship do not highlight feasting on the Sabbath. So Howe tells us at some length about feasting on the Sabbath.

 

The ancient church, Howe points out, actually forbade fasting on the Sabbath Day. The day that Christ rose from the dead is a day of rejoicing, and what makes us happier than feasting with family and friends? The Sabbath is the perfect day to be hospitable to friends and even strangers. Howe points his readers to Jewish sources about preparing food ahead of time for a big and leisurely meal on the Sabbath Day with family and friends. Americans who generally eat plentifully seven days a week need to think how to make the Sabbath Day meal a feast. Maybe more fasting the other six days would help. American Protestants traditionally put a roast in the oven on the Sabbath.

 

There is a lot in this small book: memories of Daniel’s family, their recently purchased old farm house on two acres of land outside of Providence, Rhode Island, appendices with thoughts on regular sabbatical leaves for pastors and how to deal with employers who want to require Lord’s Day work. Finally, there is the note that Sabbath-keeping is a [mostly] silent witness to an unbelieving world that God made the world and has sent his Redeemer, Jesus Christ, to save it.

 

Daniel Howe is the pastor of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in Providence, Rhode Island, a part of the Atlantic Presbytery of the RPCNA. His book is available on Amazon, where there is a favorable review of it by a frequent reviewer of books published by Crown & Covenant. Of course, it is also available from Crown & Covenant Publications, https://crownandcovenant.com/.

Bill Edgar

Book Review

They Sailed to Cyprus:

The Caskeys' Ministry in Cyprus Between the World Wars

by Jean Caskey Andrianoff

2023

 

          In 1925 a young couple sailed from New York City as missionaries to the island of Cyprus in the Mediterranean Sea. The recent seminary graduate Cloyd Caskey was from Clarinda, Iowa, and his wife Mabel was from Denison, Kansas. In Cyprus they had three children, a son in 1925 and then twins, a boy and a girl in 1928. Except for several trips back to the U.S., they lived in Cyprus until 1939, just as World War II was starting and British troops began to pour in. Back in the U.S. Mabel died of cancer in 1942. Cloyd married again in 1944. His new wife, Frances, came from Blanchard, Iowa. Their one daughter, Jean, author of this book, wrote it as a tribute to her father and to his tireless first wife who always did her duty even as she began her final struggle with cancer. Jean and her husband were long-time missionaries in Thailand.

 

While in Cyprus, Cloyd, and especially his wife Mabel, wrote frequently, many of the letters going to Mary McFarland who kept them. These letters form the basis for this book. They provide a remarkable private account of mission work, with its constant demands for hospitality, never-ending work, July and August in the cool Troodos Mountains, and finally the oppressive money shortages of the 1930s Depression.

 

Cloyd was one of the few American missionaries to Cyprus to learn Greek and preach in it. Most of the time the Caskeys lived in Nicosia, where Mabel got pulled into teaching at the all-girls American Academy. The letters do not deliberately dwell on the tensions between teaching in English and trying to evangelize in Greek; the tensions between Greek and Armenian refugees from Turkey; or the hostility of the Greek Orthodox Church, but these tensions are always in the background, and sometimes the foreground.

 

Jean’s book is not a transcription of the letters, but an account of a missionary couple’s life in the island of Cyprus between two world wars. Anyone interested in missionary work, or in the island of Cyprus, or in the world between the wars will find this book of interest. It can be bought on Amazon or purchased from Crown and Covenant, https://crownandcovenant.com.

Bill Edgar

Lower Information Words

          In his 2020 book Darwin Devolves, the Lehigh University biochemist Michael Behe wrote about oft cited textbook cases of “micro-evolution,” such as brown bear to polar bear. What happened in that case was the loss of information. The brown bear’s DNA mutated, so that it could not make pigment, producing polar bears with white fur. The “evolution” of polar bears thus turns out to be evidence against the theory of evolution from simpler to more complex animals, and a point against the neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution.

 

Ever since the Tower of Babel, languages have evolved over time, sometimes providing less information than before. Natural information loss in English produced the disappearance of “thee” and “thou,” leaving only the once-plural “you” with which to address someone else. As result of this change, we find it hard to say clearly whether we mean one or several when we say “you.” To indicate the plural “you” people therefore awkwardly say “y’all” or “y’ouns” or “you guys” or “yinz.”

 

While most language evolution happens as we can tell “by chance,” some changes result from concerted efforts to change language for ideological reasons. The means are publication style sheets, busybodies correcting other people’s English, and straightforward demands, “Don’t use that word.” Stanford University recently tried to ban from its campus words like “brave,” “seminal,” “American,” “take a shot at,” “no can do,” and “submit;” it deemed them harmful. Loudly mocked, the University backed down – for now – but users of words like “brave” and “American” were put on notice.

 

The most successful directed change in my lifetime has been the feminist campaign to eliminate the word “man” for both men and women, on the grounds that “man” for everyone “privileges” male over female. Words like “mankind,” “chairman,” “mailman,” and “businessman” were forbidden. The other day I asked our young mail deliverer, “What are you, a mailman or a mailwoman?” She answered agreeably, “Postal worker,” a unisex term that provides the same information as “mailman” once did. Okay. No harm done, nothing gained.

 

Some engineered language changes I resist. Here are four of them. You decide whether to join me in The Resistance.

1. “Parent” replacing “father” and “mother.” Knowledge that mothers and fathers are necessary to make a baby, and that they bring different things to a family, is obscured when we say, “Parent.” Where “Parent” takes over completely from “Father” and “Mother,” it begins to seem reasonable that two men or two women can serve equally well as a man and a woman to make a marriage and raise children. (Two women, in fact, raised me after my father died, my mother and her sister. I am grateful to them both, but I missed having my father in so many ways.) The reality that children need a father and a mother is kept in the wording of the Fifth Commandment, “Honor your father and mother.” I try to avoid using the word “Parent,” especially in the awful verbal form, “to parent,” as in, “I need to work on my parenting skills.” Better to say, “I need to be a better father,” or “I need to be a better mother.”

 

2. “Partner” to replace husband, or wife, or boyfriend, or girlfriend, or whatever. This usage is designed to hide information. When we read, “Bill went to the movies with his partner,” all we learn is that Bill did not go alone. Who went with him -- his wife, boyfriend, mother, brother, sister, live-in woman, mistress, or business associate? The noun “Partner” does not tell us. “Partner” serves to equalize and normalize all sorts of human connection, even illicit ones. “Partner” is a “none of your business” word, an extremely low information word.

 

3. “Server” to replace “waiter” and “waitress.” I see no reason for this change. In a restaurant it is perfectly obvious whether a man or a woman takes your dinner order. Why flatten existence in this way? I’d rather have a man say to my wife and me, “I’ll be your waiter,” than to hear, “Hi! My name is Hal. I’ll be your server today.” A robot could be a server. I prefer humans, male or female. However, we once used a word just like this, “servant,” so the change is of minor importance. A similar unisex word besides “server” is “sibling” instead of “brother” or “sister.” While sometimes convenient, unisex nouns are one-dimensional, their spreading usage slowly turning our colorful verbal world into old-fashioned black and white TV.

 

4. Like “Partner,” “Ms.” obscures a woman’s marital status by replacing the marital specific “Miss” and “Mrs.” After someone tentatively proposed “Ms.” in 1901, it remained unused until the feminist Gloria Steinem used it in 1972 for the title of her magazine, Ms. “Miss” and “Mrs.” evolved naturally in the 1800s from the even older term “Mistress,” when it acquired an additional disreputable meaning. “Miss” and “Mrs.” left people often unsure which title to use when meeting a woman. Should I call her “Miss” or “Mrs.”? A mistake could be embarrassing. The two words could also suggest that marriage status was the most important thing about any given woman – but not for men for whom “Mr.” always applied.

 

Why not adopt two words for men, such as “Mister” (Mr.) for unmarried men and “Sir” for married men? Then English will have strengthened its power to convey information rather than weakened it. Of course, it would require the cultural power of those who write style sheets for publications and universities to engineer this new usage, more power than A Little Strength has.

 

Peter wrote, “Wherefore, gird up the loins of your mind, be sober… (I Peter 1:13, KJV).” As we prepare for war with the World, we must among other things watch our tongues. Besides avoiding the blasphemous and crude language that now pervades even polite society, along with angry attack words, we also need to avoid sliding into using certain low information words that undermine the reality that God created us male and female. I avoid especially “parent,” “partner,” and even “sibling” and insist instead on “father” and “mother,” “husband” and “wife,” and “brother” and “sister.” Honor your father and mother, talk about your brothers and sisters if you have them, your sons and daughters, and let everyone know by your words if you have a husband or wife.

– Bill Edgar

A Little Help?

 

The Editors do not sell individual subscriptions to A Little Strength. Our goal is to publish with as little labor and financial overhead as possible. Yet mailing paper copies to Atlantic Presbytery churches and maintaining a website aren't free. If you have found A Little Strength to be interesting and profitable,

would you consider sending a contribution?

 

Make your check out to Elkins Park RPC, designated for A Little Strength,

and send it to the treasurer, at the church's address:

 

901 Cypress Ave, Elkins Park, PA 19027.

Authors in this issue

Bill Edgar is a retired pastor of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia) and the author of 7 Big Questions Your Life Depends On among other works.

 

John D. Edgar, the pastor of Elkins Park RPC (Philadelphia).

Susan Edgar is a member of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia).

 

Keegan O'Bannon is a member of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia).

bottom of page