top of page

Volume 8: Issue 1 | Feb 2025

Five Models/Frameworks/Disciplines for the Christian Life

 

          For seven years this journal has regularly published essays on Proverbs and the Ten Commandments. We will continue to write about God's Law and God's Wisdom, but you may also begin to see essays that have a slightly different focus.

 

T. David Gordon has recently published a book, Choose Better: Five Biblical Models for Making Ethical Decisions that claims that Christian books about ethics can be grouped into five approaches, all Biblical and helpful: Law, Wisdom, Imitation of God, Communion with God, and Spiritual Warfare. Knowing all five, and knowing when and how to use each, will help you glorify and enjoy God more fully.

 

Law: God has commanded certain duties and forbidden certain sins. We are to know and obey his law. What he has forbidden is taken off the field; we are not to include sinful options in our decision-making. These bright lines are for our good: don't do that, you'll get hurt! Our Reformed tradition stresses God's Law: see how much of the Shorter Catechism is dedicated to describing the sins forbidden and duties required by each commandment.

 

Wisdom: If multiple options are lawful, which should you pick? The law of God rules out many things, but it does not decide for us between lawful options. Single Christians may marry an eligible Christian of the opposite sex – ok, who? Someone who will have you, obviously, but whom should you seek to persuade? You have limited time and attention. The wisdom tradition is far less stressed in our Reformed tradition, yet the Book of Proverbs sits there, little used, in the center of the Bible.

 

Imitation of God: We are made in the image of God to reflect his goodness and exercise his dominion on the earth. We are to be Ruled Rulers. There is a bad way to imitate God; we are not to assume his prerogatives. There is always a profound divide between the Creator and his creatures. But God has made us his vice regents on the earth, and so we should ask, as Gordon puts it: what decision, what hobby, what use of my time will help me cultivate the image of God within, and/or the garden of God without?

 

Communion with God: Enoch walked with God. Noah walked with God. Psalm 73 concludes, “but for me, it is good to be near God.” Jesus commanded, “Abide in me, and I in you.” So, as we face a decision, let us ask, what will help me walk with God? What will help my family walk with God?

 

Spiritual warfare: The devil prowls about like a raging lion, seeking someone to devour. We are to put on the armor of God, and do all, and then stand firm on the evil day (see 1 Pt 5:8-11, Eph 6:10-20). We have an enemy who seeks our eternal destruction; we dare not remain ignorant of his schemes. So ask: is this new work promotion the straw that will break my back? Will this travel soccer team break the family? Will this decision expose me to temptations that have defeated me before? Given my limited time and energy, is this how I should carry out God's calling?

 

Look for columns exploring these five complementary themes, and if you have something to say about one of them, submit your essay to me at pastor@elkinsparkchurch.com.

John Edgar

How to Grow Wiser: Don't Scoff

A scoffer seeks wisdom in vain,

but knowledge is easy for a man of understanding.

--Proverbs 14:6

 

          A scoffer asks questions to scorn the answers. Sadducees asked Jesus about the Resurrection with the goal of mocking whatever answer he gave (Mark 12:18-27). Know-it-all scoffers, whether of the Bible, parents, teachers, or the civilization that nourishes them, seek wisdom in vain. They may even deny that genuine wisdom exists, choosing to live only by the dictates of what they imagine is prudence. But they do not know how to live wisely in the world that God created and oversees.

 

Scoffers in the 1960s scorned inherited sexual mores. They promised that no-fault divorce would benefit children, who would not have to live with quarreling parents. They promised that when all children were “wanted,” child abuse would end. They promised that removing restraints on sex outside of marriage would improve mental health. They promised that abortion on demand would finally set women free, so they could be successful and happy without a demanding baby to hinder them. They promised that medical technologies would protect the promiscuous from sexually transmitted diseases. In all of this, they have sought wisdom in vain. Can anyone a half-century later claim with a straight face that these good things have come to pass? Yet the sexual revolution rolls on to ever more barren pastures.

 

Jesus told parables to hide truth from scorners. When his disciples asked him why, he quoted Isaiah, “that seeing they would not perceive, and hearing, they would not understand (Mark 4:12).” He followed his own rule, “Do not give dogs what is holy; do not cast your pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6).” So in the end, scoffers cannot attain wisdom because God hides it from them and takes away even what they have. “For to the one who has, more will be given, and from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away (Mark 4:25).” I have seen people squander not only inherited wealth, but also what some call “social capital.” At sixty they know less about how to deal with other people than they did at twenty. Scoffers grow more foolish with age.

 

Who is the “man of understanding” for whom knowledge is easy? He is the one who gets first principles right: the fear of the Lord, humility, and a readiness to learn from the wise. The man of understanding does not “walk in the counsel of the wicked, nor stand in the way of sinners, nor sit in the seat of scoffers.” His “delight is in the law of the LORD, and he meditates on it day and night (Psalm 1:1-2).” Beginning at the right place and standing on the rock Christ Jesus, learning wisdom comes as naturally as growing does to a tree planted near a stream. Those who fear God grow wiser with age.

Bill Edgar

Getting to Know You: Erich and Bobbie Baum

 

Where are you each from?

Erich: I was born in Hobart, Indiana, a suburb of Gary in the northwest of Indiana. As a child, I lived in Mississippi, Tennessee, England, Maryland, New Mexico, Ohio, and Washington, D.C.

 

Roberta: (Bobbie) I am from Beavercreek, Ohio, a suburb of Dayton in the southwest of Ohio. I moved once down the street.

 

What did you (each) believe growing up?

We both grew up in Christian homes, professed faith in Christ at a young age and were baptized members of churches which held to Arminian/Dispensational positions.

 

Tell us about high school and beyond.

Bobbie: I went to high school in Ohio, after which time I attended college.

 

Erich: I attended 3 different high schools in 3 different states. Two formative events took place in my life while living in Ohio; I was introduced to the reformed faith, and I met Bobbie at school. After high school I wanted to marry Bobbie. Her father had other plans and did not give his blessing. Hoping to win him over, I joined the military and served in Illinois and Texas. During this time, Bobbie's father changed his mind, and we were married.

 

We spent the first years together in Texas. During this time we attended an OPC church in Wichita Falls, Texas. We then moved to Ohio, where Bobbie taught at a local high school, and I went to school. Following this, I furthered my education in Bloomington, Indiana, and Bobbie continued teaching. We were members of Bloomington RPC and welcomed the first of our five children, Robert, into the world. We moved to Durham, North Carolina for work. There we attended Triangle RPC, later named First RPC of Durham. We had two more children, Martin and Andrew, while there. Work again took us to Indianapolis, Indiana where we attended Southside RPC and had two more children, William and Henry. At last work brought us to Massachusetts where we attend First RPC of Cambridge.

 

What led you to God?

Erich: Though I had made a profession of faith at an early age, my inner and outer life did not reflect a new creation. While in college I read Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven,” and was struck with the awful sense of God's just judgment upon my unrighteous living. Following several days of intense pleading with the Lord, I read the words of Jesus in Matthew 26:38, “My soul is very sorrowful, even to death.” It was at this moment that I knew in part that sorrow, but that I deserved the coming death and judgment. It was at that same moment that I knew that Jesus, the one who didn't deserve death willingly took my place.

 

Bobbie: I have been blessed to grow up never knowing a day without God. From my earliest days I was taught about God, sin, and my need for a Savior, and I depended on Jesus as my Lord and Savior. In my teenage years, I became disillusioned by the teachings of my childhood church. The preaching and Sunday School teachings did not align with the truths that I was reading in the Bible. About that time I met a dashing young man, Erich, who introduced me to the Westminster Confession of Faith. I was excited to learn that churches held to this teaching, but in submission to my father, continued to attend my childhood church till I graduated from high school. I began attending a local OPC church after high school, but did not make the switch in membership until Erich and I were married and moved to Texas. There we became members together of an OPC church in Wichita Falls, TX.

 

What led you to visit and join a Reformed Presbyterian Church?

When we moved to Bloomington, Indiana, we were coming from membership in the OPC. The only reformed church in Bloomington at this time was this “Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America.” The first time we attended, we were stunned that this church used the “OPC's” maroon Psalter and were very concerned that there was no piano or organ. There was much consternation about whether or not the songs would be chanted. When the first note of praise rang out, we knew we had found a home. We joined because these dear people loved Jesus and each other.

 

How has God helped you in the past few years?

God has helped us in the past few years by providentially putting us into situations that require us to rely solely upon him.

 

What are you thankful for?

Jesus. A good church family. Children walking with the Lord. Healthy children. Daily bread. Work.

– Erich and Bobbie Baum

Reprint: University Religion in the USA

 

          By virtue of one three-hour class in Mandarin at the University of Southern California this past semester I was admitted to the Asian Society. The only meeting that I attended was a Chinese dinner in Chinatown to hear a Chinese Ph.D. lecture on the effects of France's recognition of Red China. During this pleasant evening, I had an opportunity to see "religion" as it is practiced and taught in one American university.

 

Our table could be taken as a cross-section sample of the graduate department students of Chinese and Japanese culture at U.S.C. At my right were a young international couple. The husband was a handsome young American teacher, a graduate of U.S.C. School of Asian studies, who is teaching Japanese now in a Los Angeles high school. His wife was a beautiful Japanese girl born in Tokyo who met her husband at the university. She teaches standard Tokyo Japanese to children of Nisei Japanese in the city. {Note: Nisei is Japanese for “second-generation”, and refers to the son or daughter of Japanese immigrants, and who was born and educated in the United States. --ed.}

 

Next to them sat a lone male, Caucasian, a rather non-communicative graduate student. Beside him and facing me were another international married couple. The man was a librarian, and his wife was a vivacious Japanese girl who had been born in the United States. They babbled on eagerly about their courtship and marriage. He had adopted Buddhism, and the couple were married by a Buddhist priest in an Episcopalian chapel on some American university campus. The young American husband told us of his religious wanderings prior to his conversion to Buddhism. He criticized the B'hai religion for intolerance. He said its followers taught equality of all religions, but they were unhappy when he left to become a Buddhist.

 

To my left was a Nisei Japanese youth whom I had met before in the University Medical Center where he works as lab assistant.

 

The center of attraction at our table, however, was a young member of the U.S.C. faculty, Dr. — of the School of Religion. He told me that he was a Lutheran. He teaches Asian religions and Indian philosophy to graduate students. The man was graduated from the University of Chicago and has spent some time in resident research in India. Later, in our conversation, I asked the professor, "Are you also a convert to Hinduism?" He replied rather primly, "I am a Christian." He followed up at once by saying with firmness, "However, I think we must take a new, friendly approach to non-Christian religions now. We cannot go to them beating them over the heads as we formerly did." This opened a brisk debate that the Professor seemed embarrassed to have fallen into, but he could not retreat. His contention was that missionary work must be an open "dialogue" between equals; that we cannot go to other ethnic faiths any longer with a closed, prejudiced, and ignorant mind.

 

My answer was rather blunt, for I predicted that if his method were to be adopted by Christian missions the non-Christian world would always win and Christianity would lose. This was painfully apparent in "Exhibit A" at our table, the young American who had married a Japanese girl and adopted her Buddhist faith — something I imagine the Professor in the School of Religion did not relish.

 

There was a cynical, mocking question put to the converted Buddhist which points the whole missionary problem today. The graduate student who was silent most of the time asked the American who had turned Buddhist; “When you changed religion didn't the folks back home lift their eyebrows? Didn't they worry about your being lost?” This was obviously funny to most of the listeners for they had a jolly laugh over it.

 

This little incident dramatically illustrates the crisis in Christian missions today in Asia, and elsewhere. Christian missions are meaningless without the premise stated in Acts 4:12: “Neither is there salvation in any other, for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.”

 

The Biblical foundations of the Christian missionary commission are generally disbelieved by many leaders in our Western churches. This university has a Methodist background, but the religion taught there now is a far cry from the evangelical gospel of John Wesley. Young Oriental students coming from fundamentalist missionary churches in Asia, possibly helped to come to America by mission money, get their faith radically upset in the Schools of Religion that dot the campuses of American universities.

 

The Los Angeles Times reported recently concerning the School of Religion at the University of Southern California that a survey by the department showed that a quarter of the 350 students enrolled in religion classes at U.S.C. claim to be atheists or agnostics. Why do they take religion courses? When polled, the students gave these reasons: interesting subject matter, personal problems relating to their own beliefs, and the teaching of the faculty itself. Dr. J. Wesley Robb, chairman of the Department of Religion, expressed satisfaction at this interest in his department by students in "an age of skepticism."

 

Modernism and Barthianism rule in the U.S.C. School of Religion. With my opinion of liberalism, I could predict that 50 per cent or even 75 per cent of the faculty in this department at U.S.C. could not be called believers in historic, Biblical Christianity. Nor do I think unbelieving students will find the true Gospel in courses at this university. What is our answer? "The preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God...For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.”

 

We Christian students dare not try to defend ignorance. A profound understanding of Oriental religions and philosophy may be necessary to all future Christian missions to Asia, but no matter how much we learn about the Eastern faiths and thought, Christ remains the only Saviour who died for sin and who rose again for our justification. The offense of the Cross can never be surrendered in favor of a puny "dialogue" of self-defeating syncretism in religion which turns the Good News of Christ into a cheap "bull session" on comparative religions. "I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; preach the word; be instant in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come (and is now here, 1964 A.D.) when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers (in the Schools of Religion), having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned into fables.” (II Timothy 4:1-4)

Samuel E. Boyle

Covenanter Witness 8/9/1964, p 89

Questions Recently Asked: What's the Blue Banner All About?

 

1. Where did the Blue Banner “For Christ’s Crown and Covenant” come from? What does it mean?

 

          The Blue Banner was made as a battle flag for General Alexander Leslie, First Earl of Leven. He used it in the First Bishops War in 1639 against the English, the year after the Scots signed their 1638 National Covenant. The National Covenant repudiated the changes in worship and government that King Charles I of England (Charles VI of Scotland) had imposed on the Church of Scotland. In 1639 the flag meant, “We fight for the National Covenant of Scotland and for the independence of the Church of Scotland from royal rule. Christ alone is Head of His Church.”

The 1643 Solemn League and Covenant allied the Scottish Covenanters with the English Parliament controlled by Puritans in England’s Civil War. It promised to extend the Reformed religion to England, Ireland, and Scotland. The Westminster Assembly (1643-1649) called to meet by the English Parliament wrote a Confession of Faith, Catechisms, and other church documents for all three Kingdoms. In the end, only the Church of Scotland lastingly adopted the bulk of their work. The banner, “For Christ’s Crown and Covenant,” now included two Covenants, the 1638 National Covenant and the 1643 Solemn League and Covenant.

 

The Covenanters and Puritans defeated Charles I in the Civil War, and the English beheaded the king after the Scots handed him over to them upon the promise that they would not kill him. However, in 1660, the son of Charles I became King Charles II of England, Scotland, and Ireland after the military leader for Parliament, Oliver Cromwell, had died in 1658. Charles II reasserted his right to be Head of the Church of Scotland and to rule it through bishops whom he appointed. He persecuted Presbyterians who refused to submit to the bishops, over time wearing them down with a mixture of persecution and enticements until only a remnant remained. People called the remnant Cameronians, after one of their leaders, the Reverend Richard Cameron. Another name for the remnant was Society People, because after their ministers were killed, they organized into lay-run Societies.

 

In 1685, Charles II died, and his brother James II became King. James II was a Roman Catholic. The English Parliament deposed James II in 1688 in favor of his daughter Mary. At the order of her uncle, King Charles II, Mary had been raised as a Protestant, and her Dutch husband William also was a Protestant. Once in power, William and Mary stopped all persecution of the Cameronians, and they allowed the Church of Scotland to be Presbyterian with no bishops. But they ignored the Covenants of 1638 and 1643, and the King exercised authority to call the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland to meet, or forbid it to meet, or to postpone its meeting. His personal representative officially attended its meetings.

 

The Cameronians, the true continuing “Kirk” (Church) of Scotland, rejected this new church whose General Assembly met at the king’s time. Soon they were nicknamed “Covenanters” because they wanted Scotland to remain loyal to the 1638 and 1643 Covenants. They also rejected the legitimacy of James II's successors and objected loudly to the 1707 Act of Union between Scotland and England. The Blue Banner now meant this: Christ alone is Head of the Church, and the Three Kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland are still bound by the 1643 Solemn League and Covenant to be Reformed in doctrine and government.

 

2. Follow up Question: What does this banner mean in America?

 

          The United States did not sign the 1643 Solemn League and Covenant, and we do not have a king, let alone a king who claims authority to call any Church of America to meet or not to meet.

 

Like words themselves, the meaning of slogans sometimes changes with time. In America, “For Christ’s Crown” still means that the Church of Jesus Christ takes its orders only from him, meeting according to its own time and place. No government edict can command the Christian Church to do what is contrary to the revealed will of God. When the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) required all employers to include abortion coverage in their health plans, the Board of Trustees of [the Covenanter] Geneva College without hesitation said, “We will not do that,” and filed a lawsuit against that government mandate. Covenanter sessions, presbyteries, and synods open and close every meeting with the words, “In the name of Jesus Christ, Zion’s only King and Head, we constitute ourselves as a court of His House….” As for “Covenant” in the slogan, we think now of the New Covenant of grace and truth that Christ brought. Any covenant that men make, whether it be personal, marital, church, or national, must be subservient in purpose and law to the Covenant of Grace, as was the intended case of the 1638 National Covenant and the 1643 Solemn League and Covenant. Hence, Covenanters protest the secular American Covenant, called the Constitution, which recognizes no higher authority than “We the People,” and urges that our national secular covenant should be amended to make it Christian.

 

“For Christ’s Crown and Covenant” is both the motto and the challenge of the Reformed Presbyterian Church to any, and all, who look to another final authority in any sphere of life than that of King Jesus, to whom all authority in heaven and earth belongs.

--Bill Edgar

Book Review

​

Hannah’s Children

The Women Quietly Defying the Birth Dearth

​

by Catherine Ruth Pakaluk, 2024

 

          I stumbled on a review of Pakaluk’s book on the leftish online magazine Slate. I found other reviews only on conservative sites. The book lauds large families – five or more kids – and concludes that only “religion” can encourage women to have enough children. Pakaluk herself, a Roman Catholic, married a widower with six children, and then had eight more, some while finishing her economics Ph.D. at Harvard.

 

Like doctors who only study illness, demographers ask, “Why are women having so few children?” It is a serious problem! For example, too few workers will soon make it impossible to continue our present system of old age pensions. The “below replacement” birth rate is one of the most consequential things happening in the world today. Governments know that too few babies is a problem, but so far every plan to boost birthrates has failed. Children are economic burdens to their parents in cities and suburbs and now in rural areas too, and parents don’t want more than a few. Plus, more and more people don’t even marry. However, for the last fifty years, about five percent of American women have chosen to have five or more children. Why? What are they thinking? Asking that question is like doctors studying how some people stay healthy and active into old age.

 

Pakaluk asked fifty-five Catholic, Evangelical, Jewish, and Mormon women about their big families. “What were you thinking as you had child after child?” Her book is the result.

 

Some books I start and never finish. Others I read straight through. A few I underline from the start. Pakaluk’s book is one of those.

“Six! I guess your husband still wants you (p 4).”

“…two ways of life…fitting oneself into a narrative of childbearing versus fitting children into a narrative of the self (p 22).”

“Tax-and-transfer pension programs make the economic benefits of childbearing public and push them into the future, while the costs of childbearing remain private and immediate – setting up a free-rider problem (p 31).” (Pardon her economic jargon: look up “free-rider problem.”)

 

All of Pakaluk’s women had college degrees or more. They knowingly passed on career, status, money, and identity for the privilege of being a mostly invisible mom. A few worked for pay. Their faith played a major part in their having many children: all spoke of trusting God to provide. However, just as importantly, these mothers just love babies and children. After the exhaustion of childbirth and a newborn, they would say after about a year, “Okay. Ready for another one!” Many lamented the time when babies were no longer biologically possible.

 

Given the huge costs of giving up workplace identities, with its status and money, Pakaluk avers that ALL governmental efforts to encourage higher birthrates will fail, just as they have so far. They can’t pay enough to change the economic calculus against large families. Tying Social Security to child-rearing rather than to taxes women pay out of paychecks might change some thinking about children, but no government anywhere has tried that gambit yet.

 

Pakaluk’s book leaves many questions still to study: 1) Husbands? Men? What do they want? That will be her next project. 2) What about non-college educated women who may have less to lose in pay and status by having many children than their more educated sisters? Some of them have large families. What are they thinking? 3) What do children think about being part of large families? (The “eldest daughter syndrome” is having a moment now in family research.) 4) How does money work for these families? Every woman she interviewed was married with husband working, but only a few admitted to times of deep financial stress. Did they benefit from inherited wealth and/or shared extended family money, for example, grandparents who sponsor various activities? 5) What happens when a husband dies leaving behind his jobless wife and many children? What about divorce? Pakaluk’s women seem not to fear these possibilities.

 

The American birthrate has been declining decade by decade since 1800, except for the 1950s. Until the 1960s women used contraception to end childbearing. Now they use it to postpone having children, so first children are coming when women are older. On farms, children could contribute economically by age six or seven: now they are a big cost center right through college and often beyond. Contraception did not begin with the Pill or with 1960s feminism, but the Pill made it much more reliable and feminists promoted the idea that being in the paid workforce should be made as desirable as possible for women.

 

Will this book make you want to go and have more children? Maybe. It should make you ask questions: what should the government do about the birth dearth? What should preachers be teaching about the first commandment in the Bible, “be fruitful and multiply?” Should we – women can’t have children alone – have another child? How about two more?

– Bill Edgar

Let Each One Remain

 

But as God has distributed to each one, as the Lord has called each one; so let him walk. And so I ordain in all the churches. Was anyone called while circumcised? Let him not become uncircumcised. Was anyone called while uncircumcised? Let him not be circumcised. Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. But keeping the commandments of God is what matters. Let each one remain in the same calling in which he was called. Were you called while a slave? Do not be concerned about it; but if you can be made free, rather use it. For he who is called in the Lord while a slave is the Lord's freedman. Likewise he who is called while free is Christ's slave. You were bought at a price. Do not become slaves of men. Brethren, let each one remain with God in that state in which he was called. – I Corinthians 7:17-24

 

          Remember the glorious newness of conversion: what it meant for the Lord to take us and bring us out of darkness and into the light of his beloved son. And remember the way that grace, in the moment of our conversion, illuminated everything in the glorious newness of the kingdom of God. Darkness turned to light; death turned to life. The idolatry of self turned to the worship and adoration of the one true and living God. Remember the newness of the Lord's grace: the new song, the new heart, the new life that became ours, when Jesus called us to himself.

 

That glorious newness, what does it mean for the lives that we were living at the time when the Lord called us to himself? Should something change about our daily lives? Do we pursue new things? Do certain things need to end and other things begin, with this radical newness? What does that mean for our lives? What should change? What shouldn't?

 

Now, I repeat the same caution that I gave before. You can come to First Corinthians 7, and if you don't understand the context of the pastoral crisis at Corinth, you'll be at great risk of twisting what Paul says and coming up with something very far from what the Apostle is, in fact, saying. So recall the specific context in which these verses are given to the church. Recall that group of people in the church at Corinth that we called the super-spirituals.

 

The super-spirituals: for this group of people, the answer was that if you've come to the Lord Jesus Christ, everything needs to change about who you formerly were. Everything needs to change, because now as a Christian believer, you are above earthly matters. You are above them; you are beyond them. And so, in the whole of life there needs to be this great upheaval and everything needs to change. Remember how that was causing specific grief to the church in Corinth, when it came to matters of marriage.

 

Remember the slogan from the start of chapter seven that the super-spirituals are applying to the church. “It is good for a man not to touch a woman.” They said that if you've come to the Lord Jesus Christ, you are above the physical, the carnal; there should be no more sexual relations among believers. Now, what did their teaching mean when applied to marriages in the church? It meant that for these super-spirituals, married couples should no longer have sexual relations. If someone was widowed or is a widower, they certainly should not think about getting remarried and entering back into a sexual relationship.

 

What does it mean if there are two people who do not believe, and one of them comes to the Lord Jesus and the other one doesn't? Again, for these super-spirituals, the answer was that the believing spouse should leave the unbelieving spouse lest the believer become contaminated. Imagine the great potential for confusion, chaos, and heartbreak that this notion caused in the church.

 

We dealt with that in our previous sermon. We saw how Paul patiently works through each one of these issues and sets the church in Corinth on the right path. That is, in the confines of marriage, sexual intimacy is a good and beautiful thing given to humanity as a gift.

 

Christians can rejoice in this, that if one spouse comes to the Lord and the other doesn't, don't rip apart the marriage! The believing spouse should love all the more in that relationship, so that their conduct might be a witness to bring the unbelieving spouse to believe in the Lord as well. But from all of that, Paul sees a deeper principle to deal with. From the specific context of marriage, he extrapolates a general principle that he now gives to all the churches. Did you notice that in verse 17? As he moves to this new section and gives this general principle, Paul doesn't want the church in Corinth to think that he's simply browbeating them or singling them out. “I ordain this for all the churches.” Brothers and sisters, this is extremely relevant for us because the apostle specifically says, Here is a principle for us to apply in every church and every generation till the Lord's return.

 

What is that general principle that Paul now gives to the Church? Remain in the state in which you are called.

 

We're going to say a lot about that principle, but there it is. Remain in the state in which you were called. It's important enough that Paul repeats it. In this short section, he repeats it three times: at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end. Verse 17: “But as God has distributed to each one, as the Lord has called each one, so let him walk.” Verse 20: “Let each one remain in the same calling in which he was called.” And verse 24 again: “Brethren let each one remain with God in that state in which he was called.”

 

Paul says, so I ordained in all the churches. What does that mean? Boiled down, it means that being a good Christian, being a Christ-honoring follower of the Way, does not primarily involve a change of circumstances but a change of heart. Remember that glorious newness that we talked about earlier that comes to us when the Lord calls us to himself; does it mean we throw all the circumstances of our lives into upheaval? It does not. At the core of this principle, Paul is telling us that being a good follower of Christ primarily involves not a change of circumstances, but rather a change of heart.

 

These aren't famous verses. I don't think I've ever talked to anyone who, in conversation about their favorite Bible passages, says, “Oh, boy you know, First Corinthians chapter 7, verses 17 through 24.” It's not a famous passage. But it should be, because this principle illuminates the whole of our lives in this passing age: what it truly means to walk faithfully before the face of God. It is a broad principle that the Holy Spirit led the apostle Paul to write that touches every aspect of our lives. Again, that being a faithful Christian believer is not primarily about changing your circumstances but about changing your heart. In other words, the calling of God's grace does not obliterate the natural order of things. But it calls us to be a Christian in those circumstances. If there's a specific moment in time that you can recall when the Lord called you to himself, remember what it was like when you woke up the next morning. I was a freshman in college. I woke up the next morning; and I was still a freshman in college. I still had a particular calling and a particular vocation. And the Lord's grace wasn't telling me to abandon college, but rather to see everything now illuminated by his grace. So everything on the one hand was new because I was seeing it in Christ, but the call was to remain and show that newness in the old context.

 

Now with the principal in front of us, look at Paul's supporting illustrations: one in verses 18 and 19 and then another in verses 21 and 22. Paul could have picked anything, right? Paul could have chosen a whole variety of illustrations. But he chooses possibly the two most controversial things that he could have chosen as illustrations; he grabs two rattlesnakes. In verses 18 and 19, he cites circumcision. Now, that may not seem like a big deal to you this morning. But imagine the radical nature of how these words would have hit the ears of Paul's original listeners: verse 19, “Circumcision is nothing.”

 

Remember, this is Paul, formerly Saul the Pharisee. Is that something that Saul the Pharisee would ever in a million years have allowed to slip past his lips? “Circumcision is nothing.” No! Before his conversion, for Saul, circumcision was everything. Circumcision was THE great marker between Jew and Gentile, the great dividing mark between those who worshiped the true God and the rest of humanity.

 

That's what Paul goes for here: what seemed to be the greatest religious barrier; what might be the most tempting thing to change. If you wanted to change your external circumstances in a religious way, what would that change look like? It would be like a man who was circumcised wanting to look uncircumcised. And it would look like an uncircumcised man wanting to become circumcised. In the historical record there were instances of both. Christians who were circumcised and wanted to distance themselves from their Jewish past sought to surgically hide the marks of circumcision. And on the other hand, there were those Christian converts who pressed closer in towards Judaism and submitted themselves to circumcision.

 

Here's what Paul says about this external circumstance. Were you circumcised when called? Don't try to be as if uncircumcised. Were you uncircumcised? Don't try to be as if you were circumcised. Why? Because circumcision and uncircumcision are nothing. Paul is not saying that under the Old Covenant, circumcision had no meaning. It had great meaning; it was an ordinance given by God to accomplish great things in the Mosaic Covenant as a sign of God's goodness to his people. But now that Christ has come such external markers are nothing. Where were you when you were called? Stay that way. Circumcision is nothing. Uncircumcision is nothing. But keeping the commandments of God is what matters.

 

Consider something Paul says in Romans chapter 2: “Circumcision is indeed profitable if you keep the law. But if you are a breaker of the law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. Therefore if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision? And will not the physically uncircumcised, if he fulfills the law judge you who even with your written code and circumcision, are a transgressor of the law.” Here's the principle in Romans that is united to what Paul is teaching to the church in Corinth: He is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. He is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart in the spirit, not in the letter, whose praise is not from men but from God.

 

Paul is concerned that this obsession with external circumstances is blinding the people of God from seeing what is most important. Don't focus on your external circumstances. That's not what makes someone a good faithful follower of Jesus. It's attention, first and foremost, on the heart. Circumcision, as of the spirit, and the matter of the heart; the law written upon the heart by the finger of the Spirit. Which is why Paul also says, at the end of his epistle to the church in Galatia, “Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything, but rather a new creation.” All of this squabbling from these supposedly super-spiritual folk in the church at Corinth; ironically, all they're doing is miring themselves down in meaningless externals. They're pretending to be oh so spiritual by the things that they're commanding, when actually they're ignoring the Spirit and becoming enslaved to men, enslaved to the elementary principles of the world, and ignoring the glorious reality of new creation.

 

What's the second rattlesnake that Paul grabs by the tail? Verses 21 and 22. If circumcision would seem to be the greatest religious temptation for a change in external circumstance, what would be the greatest temptation to seek for a change in social circumstance?

 

In the ancient Greco-Roman world, it would be slavery.

 

Paul's remark in verse 21 is every bit as shocking as his comment in verse 19: “Were you called while a slave? Don't be concerned about it.”

 

Paul's point here is not some sort of blanket endorsements of slavery. It's important to point out that what we as modern Americans knew as the practice of the slave trade was vastly different than what Paul knew as the practice of slavery in the ancient Greco-Roman world. We're not going to talk at length about that now, but Paul is not giving a blanket endorsement of slavery.

 

For clarity's sake, here are a few points. The practice of slavery in the ancient Greco-Roman world was not the altogether brutal and sinful practice of man-stealing that was the West African slave trade that fed American slavery. At the time when Paul is writing to the Corinthian church, in cities such as Corinth and Rome and elsewhere in the Empire, slaves comprised up to one-third of the population. They would have been from all professions, from very menial laborers all the way up to lawyers and doctors. In many ways, slaves then had much more freedom and stability than a lot of free people do in our society today.

 

Paul's point in invoking slavery here is to emphasize how truly he believes the principle that he's giving to the churches. That being a faithful Christian is not first and foremost a matter of external circumstances, but a matter of the heart. Not changing your state of life externally but changing your heart in submission to the Spirit and in reliance on his grace.

 

Paul chooses these two examples because he wants to make the most powerful greater-argument-to-the-lesser-argument that he can. If circumcision is nothing, if slavery is not something to be concerned with, then brothers and sisters, look at us. Look at us whining and complaining. Oh, if only our external circumstances were different, we'd be better Christians, we'd be more faithful!

 

No, Paul says. Faithfully following Jesus is not a matter of changing your externals, but for looking to the heart, submitting it to the Lord Jesus, taking up your cross and following him.

 

In other words, if it is true for the slave, that his faithfulness doesn't hinge on whether or not he has freedom, then it's true for all of us. Notice what Paul says there. He says, don't be concerned about it, but listen, if the opportunity comes up and you can be free, take it. But he continues in verse 22 with this second illustration. How can he say this? On what basis can Paul say something so seemingly radical, and so against... I mean, imagine being a slave and sitting there, hearing Paul tell you: “Are you a slave? Don't be concerned about it.” Well, Paul, how? How is such a thing possible?

 

He tells us in verse 22. “He who is called in the Lord while a slave is the Lord's freedman. Likewise he who is called while free is Christ's slave.” These things are possible because the Lord Jesus Christ has made all things new.

 

What is true in society is not necessarily the case at all when we look at the ways of the kingdom of God. Think about the teaching of our Savior: “For many who are first shall be last, and many who are last shall be first in the kingdom of my father.”

 

There is very often a great and mighty reversion principle in the kingdom. Where the lowliest slave downtrodden by all parts of society is in fact, the Lord's freedman, beloved by the Son of God; kept in the palm of his hand and reserved for great glory on the last great day. While meanwhile the greatest emperor on earth arrayed in the finest of everything that wealth and affluence has to offer will be trodden under foot by the King of kings when he comes to judge the living and the dead.

 

Again, this is something that Paul glories in when he writes to the churches. Galatians 3:26-29, NKJV: “For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek. There is neither slave nor free. There is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

 

The world is obsessed with these oppositions, right? How do we find peace among different ethnicities, such as Jew and Greek? How do we find peace and equality among different economic statuses such as slave and free? How do we find equality between the sexes, male and female? The world has its own answers. But every single one of them leads to the same warmed-over tyranny of sin, and leads only to greater misery, greater enslavement, and more death.

 

The Christian has – and the Christian alone has – true peace. When it comes to Jew and Gentile, what does Paul say to the church in Ephesus? There is now one new man created out of the two. How? Through the blood of the cross, for he himself is our peace. All the attempts at peace and reconciliation in this passing age may result in temporary moments of less violence, but they will not last because they do not seek peace in the only one in whom it is to be found: Christ and Christ Jesus alone.

 

We have circumcision and slavery as the two illustrations that Paul places before us to illuminate the principle. And now we need to qualify the principle. Not water it down but to acknowledge that it has to be read in harmony with the rest of scripture.

 

And we're going to do this on another occasion as well. But to begin, if you are converted and are in a sinful situation, the Lord is not saying that you should stay in that situation. An example would be if you were a professional gambler or if you were a prostitute. Paul is not saying remain as you are if you are called while in that type of condition. So in other words, if we are called and the Lord brings to us a clear revelation of how we are involved in sin, we need to change. There needs to be a change in that situation.

 

But all other things being equal, if you're not involved in sin in your station of life, then your greatest spiritual need is not a change in your circumstances, but again, a change of heart. This is so useful to us because it comes to us in an American context where a focus on external circumstances is nearly all that we hear about in the culture all around us. I want us to talk briefly about two traps in modern American culture that Paul's teaching helps us avoid.

 

The first is the trap of the American Dream. That's what we're going to call it for now, the trap of the American Dream. We praise God that we live in a country that affords us so much opportunity to take care of ourselves, our families, our loved ones, to have the freedoms that we have. But there's a subtext, right? If you're not moving up that ladder, what are you really? What worth do you have if you're not on that upward moving escalator of more: more prosperity, more money, more stuff, more influence. You know, we even have phrases for it, right? Climb the corporate ladder; keep up with the Joneses.

 

Paul's principle, “Remain in the state in which you are called,” frees us from the trap of the American Dream that enslaves people to finding their self-worth, their value, their identity in external circumstances. For the world, what defines who they are? As you look across American society how do people define themselves? By their station in life.

 

But not so in Christ. For he who is called in the Lord while a slave is the Lord's freedman. Likewise he who is called while free is Christ's slave. Brothers and sisters, we were bought with a price. We were bought with a price, we dare not give ourselves back to the slavery that comes with this myopic focus on external circumstances. Finding our worth and our identity in what we do, what we have, as opposed to who we are in the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

This brings us to a second qualification of the principle. Does the principle, “Remain in the state in which you are called,” mean we should strive for nothing? Is Paul telling us, don't try to advance your station in life at all ever for any reason?

 

That is, of course, not at all what he is saying. Paul is not saying, don't ever change. Paul is saying, don't look to your circumstances as the source of your identity, or your worth, or your happiness. Those things are to be found in Christ. Do you want to get a promotion at work? Pursue it, commit it to the Lord, work hard, but be happy with whatever he brings. Rest in him.

 

We read from Jeremiah 31. What is the satisfaction of our souls? It is his goodness. Seek not the satisfaction of your soul in external circumstances. Seek it in the goodness of the Lord.

 

Paul is not saying don't pursue advancement; he is saying do so carefully, keeping watch over your heart. Never confuse a change in external circumstances with what Christ truly calls his people to, which is a change of heart.

 

So we have the trap of the American Dream and secondly, now the trap of the victim mentality. You know, there's two ways that this enslavement can go. If you are focused on externals, you can be enslaved to the upward pull of more more more. What happens if you're obsessed with externals, but you don't get to the next “more”? There's another trap waiting for you, and it's the trap of the victim mentality. As a society we are quite addicted to it. Are you miserable? Are you downtrodden? Are you unhappy? Are you unsuccessful? Are you unhealthy? Don't worry, it's someone else's fault. It's not you. It's your circumstances.

 

This whole other trap is waiting for us on the other side of the obsession with externals, that tells us Don't. You don't have to attend to your own heart, because your problems involve your circumstances. It's your job, it's your marriage. It's your upbringing. There are many ways this comes across and is pitched to us. Just so long as you don't actually have to look at yourself, examine your own heart, and bring it before the Lord to see the rot that lies within.

 

Often this type of observation can be associated with a political position. But focus that entirely misses the point. This is, in fact, a nonpartisan addiction in American society. Conservatives and liberals both are enslaved to a victim mentality. The difference is just who they're blaming for their problems. It's why there's a twenty six point two billion dollar counseling industry in the United States of America. How is there a $26,200,000,000 counseling industry, and we're just getting more miserable and more violent as a society?

 

It's because we're not addressing the heart. It's all about just shuffling the same miserable people around into different circumstances, and exacerbating problems and not healing them. If we're to talk about Christian Counseling, this practice must be at the heart of the difference with secular counseling: that Christian Counseling looks not to a change simply of external circumstances but of the heart. That it brings people before the mirror of God's word and says, you need to look at the condition of your heart and where there is sin, you need to bring it to the Lord and repent of it and turn from it.

 

There's the trap of the American Dream on the one side. There's the trap of the victim mentality on the other. And bringing us back, brothers and sisters – there's the beauty of what the Lord calls us to as Christian believers, which is a focus, not on external circumstances, but on the heart.

 

As we close, listen, this is not an easy thing. This is why this passage is so important. And so relevant to where the churches in modern society are. It's not easy because we hear competing voices from every angle. The moment we step out into the world, we are being shouted at with a diametrically opposed message.

 

As we close I have three encouragements.

 

First encouragement: God has called you. We see that throughout this passage, in nearly every verse: God has called you. In the midst of whatever your circumstances of life were, God reached down with the mighty arm of his grace and he grabbed hold of you, and he made you new. He made you a new man, a new woman in Christ Jesus. And that is who you are. He has grabbed hold of you and he will not let you go. And nothing will snatch you from his hand; he has called you. Your whole spirit, soul, and body will be kept blameless on the day of Christ Jesus because he who called you is faithful; he will surely do it.

 

Secondly, not only has God called you in his grace but he has put you exactly where he wants you to be. Did you catch that in verse 17? The very first words of our passage, “But as God has distributed to each one.” Our position in life is a matter of God's wise and gracious Providence. He didn't make a mistake in putting you where you are. He put you where you are for a reason: to walk faithfully before him in a way that no one else could, because no one else has been put in exactly the place in which he has put you. It's not an accident where you are; not a fluke. It's not a mistake, for God has distributed to each one. He has called you and he has placed you. And he has done both of these things not for your harm, but for your good and for his glory. He has called you. He has placed you.

 

And lastly, brothers and sisters, he is with you. Look at verse 24. See those two words: with God. Just two words, but they change everything. “Brethren let each one remain with God.” He has called you; he has placed you; but he hasn't done these things just to leave you on your own and say, “I hope it works out; see you on the other side!” He has called us, he has placed us, and he is with us. Whatever your circumstances, whatever challenges they involve. Whatever difficulties. Whatever sufferings – God is with you.

 

You can think of the way in which Jesus spoke to his disciples on the eve of his crucifixion. “I will not leave you as orphans. I will come to you.” And, of course, Jesus was speaking there of the great and coming day of Pentecost, when having been exalted to the right hand of God, he would pour out his Spirit on his church. This with us, brothers and sisters, is a trinitarian “with us.” We have a father in Heaven who has called us and placed us. We have a Savior who has redeemed us by his blood and who is not far from us, but who is with us and who is in us by the Spirit whom he has poured into our hearts.

 

“I will not leave you as orphans. I will come to you.” And think of the beautiful and glorious and comforting way in which Jesus prays for us, John 17. “I do not pray that you should take them out of the world but that you should keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world just as I am not of the world. Sanctify them by your truth. Your word is truth.” That is our Savior's prayer and his desire for us. And he goes on, “Father, I desire that those whom you have given to me should be with me where I am.” God has called you, God has placed you, and God is with you to this beautiful end: that when we put off these mortal bodies and enter into his presence, we should see the glory of our Savior. That when our resurrection bodies are called out of the grave by his command, that we should see him as he is, in the glory that he had with his father from before the foundation of the world. In your difficulty, in your suffering, in this present life, yes, our external circumstances bring much affliction, but God has called you. God has placed you. And God is with you.

Alex Tabaka

A Little Help?

 

The Editors do not sell individual subscriptions to A Little Strength. Our goal is to publish with as little labor and financial overhead as possible. Yet mailing paper copies to Atlantic Presbytery churches and maintaining a website aren't free. If you have found A Little Strength to be interesting and profitable,

would you consider sending a contribution?

 

Make your check out to Elkins Park RPC, designated for A Little Strength,

and send it to the treasurer, at the church's address:

 

901 Cypress Ave, Elkins Park, PA 19027.

Mark Your Calendars

​

We note, for your calendars and prayer, upcoming events of interest to Atlantic Presbytery.

​

Sprinter Retreat, Pres of the Alleghenies       March 14-16, 2025       Franklin, PA

 

Spring Atlantic Presbytery Meeting       March 21-22, 2025       Hazleton, PA

​

RPCNA Synod      June 17-20, 2025       Indiana Wesleyan University (Marion, IN)

 

Retreats and conferences are usually for grades 7-12 unless otherwise indicated.

Please contact Kyle and Violet Finley, Atlantic Youth Coordinators (atluth@gmail.com) for more information if interested in the youth events.​​​​

Authors in this issue

​

Erich and Bobbie Baum are members of Cambridge RPC (Boston). Erich is a newly ordained elder there.

 

Sam Boyle was a speaker at a White Lake Reunion in the 1930s before going to China as a missionary. In the 1960s, he preached frequently for Broomall RP Church when they were without a pastor.

​

William J. Edgar is a retired pastor of Broomall RPC (Philadelphia) and the author of the following books:

Chutzpah Heroes: Thirteen Stories About Underdogs with Wit and Courage

History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America 1871-1920: Living By Its Covenant of 1871

History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America 1920-1980: Decade by Decade

 7 Big Questions Your Life Depends On 

All books are available from both Crown & Covenant and Amazon and other online vendors. 

​

John Edgar is the pastor of Elkins Park RPC (Philadelphia).

​

Alex Tabaka was the pastor of Broomall, RPC until recently. He is now the pastor of Los Angeles RPC. Please remember Los Angeles in your prayers as the city deals with the aftermath of the catastrophic fires.​​​

​

bottom of page